ohnonotgmail wrote: » Very possibly you are correct. My memory of the reason for the protest is a little hazy. I mostly remember the young guard who into trouble for removing his shoulder numbers before laying into protestors with a baton. And a proper old fashioned wooden baton at that, none of that modern ASP rubbish.
jeremyj1968 wrote: » Gemma's not right about everything but she's right about a lot of stuff. And she got google to back down, which was a serious achievement in itself. tbh, she made a video yesterday pointing out their sweetheart tax deals, so I'd say head office said "do whatever you need to do to shut that down". Just remember, the issue that her channel was taken down over was over her having a picture of Mary Boyle in her background. A local FF politician shut down this investigation before it had begun. Gemma reported this fact, but RTE didn't. Most people are fine to just sit back and listen to what RTE tells them and be a good little citizen, not questioning anything they are told. I think calling Gemma a nutter just makes them feel better about themselves, because seeing somebody who takes action might make them feel inferior , given what little action they have taken about anything in their own life.
Den14 wrote: » Your playing to a hard crowd here. TBH I think your points are valid it's just you may find it hard to get many to agree with you in this forum.
jeremyj1968 wrote: » Gemma's not right about everything but she's right about a lot of stuff. And she got google to back down, which was a serious achievement in itself. tbh, she made a video yesterday pointing out their sweetheart tax deals, so I'd say head office said "do whatever you need to do to shut that down". Just remember, the issue that her channel was taken down over was over her having a picture of Mary Boyle in her background. A local FF politician shut down this investigation before it had begun. Gemma reported this fact, but RTE didn't.
Mr Jinx wrote: » Where's the evidence she got Google to back down?? because she said so? Her type are the best at fake news.
Birneybau wrote: » The ignore list grows ever longer...
tayto lover wrote: » I feel a little bit of sympathy for Gemma. I hope she receives the psychiatric treatment she needs. It could happen to anyone.
one world order wrote: » Funny watching people not being able to stomach the truth, so instead they use insults or in this case pretending to be sympathetic and saying the other person is not well. I guess some people are happy to go along with whatever the mainstream media tells them and put anything else down as a conspiracy.
one world order wrote: Funny watching people not being able to stomach the truth, so instead they use insults or in this case pretending to be sympathetic and saying the other person is not well. I guess some people are happy to go along with whatever the mainstream media tells them and put anything else down as a conspiracy.
pjohnson wrote: » While others just think every bit of research/news is false and believe whatever unicorn fart nonsense O'Doherty tweets out :pac:
gman2k wrote: » She tweeted the other day that Storm Erik was fake. She is full on Alex Jones now. I'm blocked by her since asking questions early in the Presidential campaign. But I can view her tweets via mobile site not logged on. She had a photo of a Garda at Google and accused him of assault. I hope he sues her.
one world order wrote: » Okay, but I would still listen to what she says and decide myself what is right or wrong. Definitely wouldn't label someone as crazy or a unicorn because I don't agree with their viewpoint. Granted she sensationalises some things but other things are worth thinking about.
one world order wrote: » Okay, but I would still listen to what she says and decide myself what is right or wrong. Definitely wouldn't label someone as crazy or a unicorn because I don't agree with their viewpoint.
Dante Whispering Veterinarian wrote: » Good man, ignore anyone who doesn't agree exactly with your worldview, that's productive.
super_furry wrote: » Why not? Not all opinions are equal and right now, Gemma's are up there with the crazies who wander around barking at walls and mumbling to themselves.
one world order wrote: » Nope, keep an open mind, hear both sides and make an informed decision. Saying she's batshlt crazy or unicorn fart shows a lack of counter argument.
GinAndBitter wrote: » That's a lovely way to speak about the mentally ill.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » I hope this doesn't sound condescending, but at this stage, I don't think we should discount the idea that G'OD should seek some medical assistance. I say that as someone who knows people living with various disorders involving paranoia, not saying it to insult or disparage her. I remember her appearing on TV before her very public firing from the Indo, and she was a rock of sense. Something has gone terribly wrong.
Ipso wrote: » Chances are she wouldn't seek it voluntarily, and it seems like the people she is knocking around with won't be knocking down Mensa's doors soon. Also the mouth breathing oxygen thieves who lap up the conspiracy nonsense are only enabling her.
batgoat wrote: » Can you clarify, do you think there's a Zionist plot to take over the globe? Do you even believe in the holocaust?