Southdubin6 wrote: » I can’t imagine anyone thinks coke is great.
Southdubin6 wrote: » The lads a simple half wit. His posts show as much, by joking bout being someone on the street begging for the next fix is mocking addiction. I’ve tried drugs but for me a few pints is enough , but I’d never look down me nose at those in bad positions due to addiction.
piplip87 wrote: » I disagree. Coke is great fun. Like everything else if used in moderation. Absolutely nothing wrong with somebody who might have a sniff every now and then. It's the same with all the major vices. Chances are the if it wasn't Coke your buddy from school would be in the same state from Drink or gambling. Just because you know a few people who have had addiction issues with a substance does not mean that it's bad or worse than any of the others. Going by your logic Pubs, Bookies and off licence's should all be banned because a small percentage of the people who drink or gamble become addicted. Chances are you know far more people who like a sniff who live normal, healthy and happy lives than those it is a problem for.
realdanbreen wrote: » I take it that English is not your first language otherwise only a complete ape would think my post was joking about drug addiction.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » Gardai investigating after houses blasted by shotgun in west Dublin.https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/gardai-investigating-after-houses-blasted-15823993
begbysback wrote: » Southdublin6 v realdanbren making hutch v Kinahan look like a primary schoolyard fight
P.Walnuts wrote: » You have to question where on earth the Guards were for the second incident? House gets shot up and 3 hours later people think they'll get away with shooting up another house a stones throw away... I say that in the belief the first shooting was reported in time, if not then fair enough.
Southdubin6 wrote: » Bagsy to be Kinahan side hahah
realdanbreen wrote: » Fair enough, I still think Gerry is a wily old fox and will win out in the end.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Isn't a bit late for that? I'm not sure how anything he does can really be described as "winning" now, given how many of his loved ones have died in retaliatory attacks. It's a bit like the later stages of Breaking Bad at this stage - can anyone claim that Walt "won", even as he managed to get his money to his family and kill Jack's crew, seeing as they'd killed his brother in law and his entire family had been ripped apart ? I just don't see any end to this in which The Monk gets a happy ending. So many of his close relatives are now dead that it seems to me a happy ending is off the table - I can't imagine the grief he must be experiencing tbh, it beggars belief just how many of his brothers and nephews he's lost at this stage.
The Enbalmer wrote: » Eh,one of each?
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Gary, Gareth and Derek were all nephews of his, no?
The Enbalmer wrote: » Ah yes..apologies. Still just the one brother though.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Yeah for some reason I thought Patsy was one of the deceased, but it seems he's just had a bunch of near misses. Either way, I just don't see any sort of happy conclusion to this from Gerry's point of view, after so much loss. Even wiping out every member and associate of both the Kinahan and Byrne gangs at this stage wouldn't bring any of his relatives back It's such a ridiculously sad situation all around.
Rows Grower wrote: » The Mirror have put up a video of gangsters shooting at each other in Corduff in the middle of the day. As you do.
The Enbalmer wrote: » Gangsters my hoop..Fcuckwits.
Rows Grower wrote: » What is the issue with the word gangsters?It's clearly what they are.
The Enbalmer wrote: » It's clearly what they *think* they are..in reality they will die penniless like the rest of the idiots who think getting hold of a firearm makes you a big name in criminal circles. They certainly won't be causing the Hunts or Arifs or MS 13 any sleepless nights.
Rows Grower wrote: » I don't think you know what the word "gangster" actually means.
El_Bee wrote: » Gangsters as in people who belong to a gang?