nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Margaret Cash steals €300 worth of clothes from Penneys and aftermath/etc!

jjmcclure

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/homeless-mumofseven-margaret-cash-appears-in-court-over-stealing-300-worth-of-clothes-from-penneys-37434491.html

Where are RTE now?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Credit Checker Moose

tuxy wrote: »

No one on here took a screenshot AFAIK. Welfare can access info on the will just like the papers did.

I am sure the relevant authorities are fully aware by now.

DEFTLEFTHAND

Alrigghtythen wrote: »

What did her mother work at to save so much?

The next thing CAB will be investigating.

Poor aul maggser can't catch a break it seems.

normanoffside

Looking at Maggie's semi-literate post last night and Bernard's twitter page, it's definitely consistent with his writing.

https://twitter.com/1bernardsweeney/status/1093183292365570051

Bernard Sweeney wrote:

TraVision invites Liam Neeson to come on our show & talk about "Racisim", we will have various expertise from different communities, its our believe that Liam is not a racist even if he had thoughts and actions that were. @lilyallen in 2008 were you sprouting of racist jokes?

Bernard Sweeney wrote:

Let the victims of racisim speak with, Laim Neeson?. Let's look at it from different perspectives let's have such people on "TraVision" Irish Traveller TV Company. Racism isn't just black & white, let's learn from this that is helpful. Laim and I come from different community's!.

Bernard Sweeney wrote:

Miss Lily Allen, I hate to remind you, but were you not the same person that was sprouting off anti Traveller anti Gypsy racist rhetoric in the past (2008)?. Had you not apologised for it, did we not all "move on"?. @lilyallen
@ Liam Neilson

Ruraldweller56

Credit Checker Moose wrote: »

I am sure the relevant authorities are fully aware by now.

I'd be reminding her of it every single time I see one of her stupid posts. Oh and BTW, if she's been sitting on this fund for a while

https://www.radiokerry.ie/tralee-woman-fined-falsely-obtaining-e15000-social-welfare-payments/

normanoffside

normanoffside wrote: »

I think Sweeney must be riding her. Her roaring in front of the Dail is his feature video on Travision and he called her The Traveller Rosa Parks.
He has commented on her page saying she'd make a great presenter.

Another case in point

https://twitter.com/1bernardsweeney/status/1092570127802007552

Jerichoholic

The Traveller Rosa Parks?

Fire me directly into the sun please.

padd b1975

Alrigghtythen wrote: »

What did her mother work at to save so much?

Clothes peg saleswoman.

jay0109

Credit Checker Moose wrote: »

Amazing how many are sticking up for her and condoning her actions.

Freeloaders Utd

Roger Hassenforder

Ruraldweller56 wrote: »

I'd be reminding her of it every single time I see one of her stupid posts. Oh and BTW, if she's been sitting on this fund for a while

https://www.radiokerry.ie/tralee-woman-fined-falsely-obtaining-e15000-social-welfare-payments/

...evidence that Ms Nammock had obtained €15,056 through providing false or misleading information.

...she has repaid €920 so far, and has put in place a system to repay €20 per week...

to repay the full amount... will take 14 years.

Judge Waters fined 28-year-old Ms Nammock €250.

For fúcks sake.

Dante7

Posting up details of an upcoming windfall smacks of trying to make the ex jealous. The fact that the post was also written by someone more literate also hints at another bloke. Although, Travellers don't readily divorce.

Jerichoholic

normanoffside wrote: »

Another case in point

https://twitter.com/1bernardsweeney/status/1092570127802007552

That is the most amateur hour garbage imaginable. That Bernard lad has absolutely zero business hosting that. Each guest has a radio mic on, yet the only sound being picked up is from the camera.

He's also looking for 25,000 euro for "equipment".

jay0109

What a backward country in this day and age, that an estate left upon someone's death is not notified across all Govt Dept's especially Soc Welfare with the names, PPS numbers and amounts received of those named in the will.

normanoffside

Dante7 wrote: »

Posting up details of an upcoming windfall smacks of trying to make the ex jealous. The fact that the post was also written by someone more literate also hints at another bloke. Although, Travellers don't readily divorce.

I’ve a feeling that Bernard is going to be in for a world of pain when Johnny is released. It might even change his own view on travellers.

Ruraldweller56

Roger Hassenforder wrote: »

...evidence that Ms Nammock had obtained €15,056 through providing false or misleading information.

...she has repaid €920 so far, and has put in place a system to repay €20 per week...

to repay the full amount... will take 14 years.

Judge Waters fined 28-year-old Ms Nammock €250.

For fúcks sake.

Well look, at least something was done in that case. She didn't exactly get away with it even if it was light.

Why isn't Cash hammered the same way over this?

Ruraldweller56

Jerichoholic wrote: »

That is the most amateur hour garbage imaginable. That Bernard lad has absolutely zero business hosting that. Each guest has a radio mic on, yet the only sound being picked up is from the camera.

He's also looking for 25,000 euro for "equipment".

Maybe if all of his grandchildren, nieces, nephews and cousins chipped in €10 a month for a year he'd have it

Gravelly

Jerichoholic wrote: »

He's also looking for 25,000 euro for "equipment".

You'd think he'd know somewhere to get "equipment" handy, wouldn't you?

Dante7

normanoffside wrote: »

I’ve a feeling that Bernard is going to be in for a world of pain when Johnny is released. It might even change his own view on travellers.

He'll be protected by the bossmen. Same as with John Connors. They are vital for the PR campaign which keeps the money rolling in. Johnny will be advised to back off.

Credit Checker Moose

normanoffside wrote: »

I’ve a feeling that Bernard is going to be in for a world of pain when Johnny is released. It might even change his own view on travellers.

Is the husband still in government digs?

She is down as "divorced" on fakebook.

airy fairy

Would her 100k windfall be subject to tax or considered income until it actually gets into her hands at 35years?
Was she supposed to declare it even though she didn't really get the cash yet?

normanoffside

Gravelly wrote: »

You'd think he'd know somewhere to get "equipment" handy, wouldn't you?

I dunno. Judging by his lack of subscribers, I doubt many travellers think much of him. Especially after his ‘uncle Tom’ portrayal of Ballinrobe (and presumably other rural) travellers.

normanoffside

Dante7 wrote: »

He'll be protected by the bossmen. Same as with John Connors. They are vital for the PR campaign which keeps the money rolling in. Johnny will be advised to back off.

I don’t think John Connors has been openly caught coveting over other travellers wives?

[Deleted User]

Credit Checker Moose wrote: »

Is the husband still in government digs?

She is down as "divorced" on fakebook.

I’m not sure if he’s back inside. Last August he was on remand but was later released but has his case been heard yet?

Cynic in me still thinks the separated spiel is still just that, spiel. She said she was single when he was on remand then lo and behold, they are trying again when he gets out. My take is they then saw it as beneficial for her to be single so throw up that pic of a woman walking outside (cos it really proved cheating, that pic) but the reality is they are still husband and wife.

Watch this space.

It wasnt me123

jay0109 wrote: »

What a backward country in this day and age, that an estate left upon someone's death is not notified across all Govt Dept's especially Soc Welfare with the names, PPS numbers and amounts received of those named in the will.

You do actually, but not if your portion falls below the inheritance tax limits.

For a child, from memory, its over €300,000 I think so as she received less than that, you don't have to put it on the forms but if she is left more by someone else, she will have to mention any legacy she has received in the past.

airy fairy

It wasnt me123 wrote: »

You do actually, but not if your portion falls below the inheritance tax limits.

For a child, from memory, its over €300,000 I think so as she received less than that, you don't have to put it on the forms but if she is left more by someone else, she will have to mention any legacy she has received in the past.

Would she be subject to changes or deductions in welfare once this is reported to social and revenue?

It wasnt me123

airy fairy wrote: »

Would she be subject to changes or deductions in welfare once this is reported to social and revenue?

Not sure but I would assume so.

They take all income/savings/winnings into consideration in working out what funds you have at any given moment if you are receiving social welfare payments - but she doesn't have it yet - though if she gets a drawdown for "emergency expenses" she will have to declare it.

qo2cj1dsne8y4k

airy fairy wrote: »

Would she be subject to changes or deductions in welfare once this is reported to social and revenue?

She’d be absolutely meanstested

Sweet.Science

Jasiah Hot Talker wrote: »

She’d be absolutely meanstested

It won’t stay in her account for long

It wasnt me123

Sweet.Science wrote: »

It won’t stay in her account for long

It won't matter - if she received it, even in €1 coins, she will have to declare it and show where she used it.

Henry Ford III

It wasnt me123 wrote: »

It won't matter - if she received it, even in €1 coins, she will have to declare it and show where she used it.

Compliance and disclosure wouldn't be strong suits one would imagine.

ShaneC93

It wasnt me123 wrote: »

It won't matter - if she received it, even in €1 coins, she will have to declare it and show where she used it.

If she gets €100K into her account there's no way she'll still qualify for much unemployment welfare. Even if she puts the full amount into savings (unlikely) she'd be calculated as earning interest / returns of €270 a week on it.

But at 35 she'll still be getting child benefit for 6 of the 7 kids she has now and likely will have her 'forever home' so she's effectively getting a boost in her pension and some cash to blow on expensive decorations.