Cookiemunster wrote: » I know someone affected by it. They were called in and people were told that they were being let go and the ones remaining told that their overtime was gone. I think it was 6-8 people let go.
Shn99 wrote: » So it doesn’t matter that employees were told 15 minutes before the flight landed that today would potentially be their last day? Rubbish.
Clareman wrote: » I don't think they were being told it was their last day I think it was just that the flight wouldn't be stopping in Shannon anymore
Comhra wrote: » No. The purpose of the stop at Shannon was just to screen US bound passengers until such time as Kuwait Airways were given permission for the screening to happen upon their arrival in JFK.
Stanford wrote: » It was also a refueling stop
Dave1794 wrote: » Ryanair Launches Munster Rugby Flights from Shannon to Edinburgh DATE ROUTE DEPARTS 29 March Shannon – Edinburgh 16:40 & 20:00 31 March Edinburgh – Shannon 12:00 & 15:20
Deagol wrote: » Crazy expensive. €300 return is the cheapest I can find. Better off doing the packages with Munster Sports Travel!
Brennans Row wrote: » The UK Airport Provisional Statistics for November and December are out but not complete.
JCX BXC wrote: » They refueled, but that was not why they stopped, they can make the journey nonstop from Kuwait.
lisasimpson wrote: » Plus they should be a lot more active on social media promoting themselves and its routes Limerick and the mid west region is a place with a lot going for it and on the way up. Hopefully Shannon aiport can follow suit
Poxyshamrock wrote: » They do constantly promote the airport on Facebook and Instagram but it’s not very effective.
hobie14 wrote: » Condor A330 en-reroute to Cancun turned round and landed a few minutes ago ? .....
Shn99 wrote: » Reports of smoke in cockpit
Shn99 wrote: » Shannon had the worst punctuality record of Ireland's main airports last yearhttps://fora.ie/shannon-airport-flight-delays-2018-4475854-Feb2019/
Shn99 wrote: » WHSmith landslide has closed down, 2 vending machines now in its place
JCX BXC wrote: » That's really really poor.