Is accountability alien to our public sector?
mikeecho wrote: » Yes. No need for a poll. End
PhilOssophy wrote: » Where did I mention anything about a poll? It is a discussion.
mikeecho wrote: » You can't beat a good poll End
Edward M wrote: » Of course you can. . Accountability should eventually stop with the minister and Govt responsible. All this has been signed off by them, all an enquiry will do is try to shift the blame further down the line, hence the wording that this shouldn't be about personal accountability. Interesting listening to that twat Donnelly from FF on the six one too, he said if it wasn't for brexit there would be a totally different response from FF and they would be seeking accountability from the minister and Govt, virtually saying they would collapse the Govt over this but for brexit. Gutless cowards in FF too to let this go without looking for heads now.
PhilOssophy wrote: » This follows hot on the heels of a scandal which cost people their lives in the cervical cancer scandal - public servants knew that women were terminally ill and didn't compel doctors to tell these women. 1 person retired, and swanned off with a big pension. /quote] Sorry that is not true, it is not the case that they weren't told they were terminally ill. It is the case that when their files were rechecked after a cervical cancer diagnosis, some screens showed indications of cancer. This should have been communicated to patients but wasn't ,a disgrace but very different from your assertion.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » That’s totally wrong. The politicians may be somewhat responsible but in general they don’t micro manage these services or the day to day administration
PhilOssophy wrote: » Firstly, it is important to say that I do not mean this as an attack on the public sector,
ankles wrote: » It's actually quite hard to fire people in the private sector as well.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » There some hypocrites considering the port tunnel was budgeted at 400 million but came in at 850 million under FF. Ultimate hypocrisy.
n97 mini wrote: » Relatively speaking it's not. Of all the people fired from their jobs in 2018 what was the ratio of public vs private, considering the public sector is around 18% of the workforce. From memory the high profile cases all retired first, which is the public sector equivalent of "the payoff" you mention.
ankles wrote: » What I'm saying is its hard to fire in general, but in the public sector they won't even pay people off to get rid of them. Add in the absence of redundancy and no one ever gets fired, in any shape or form, in the public sector. Apart from people caught thieving or fighting. Actually most fired civil servants are due to persistent non-attendance or lateness. The clock evidence is the employer's friend.