Ride her like horse wrote: » I know unemployable dole lifes get a lot of stick here but what is your opinion on people who have been working 2/3 days a week for years and get dole for the days they don't work so are also classed as long-term unemployed
malinheader wrote: » If you're working for the minimum wage then alot of the time you are much better off only working 2 or 3 days and claiming benefits for days not working. It's the way the system is and i don't think to many would rather work 5 days for less if it was the case.
Ride her like horse wrote: » what is your opinion on people who have been working 2/3 days a week for years and get dole for the days they don't work
Effects wrote: » I thought once you worked 3 days you lost your whole weeks entitlement? And for two days you lose something like 160 euro, so not much left after that.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » People around these parts get very animated about people on the dole and council houses etc But would they live for one week under those conditions only a couple of hundred a week in your pocket living in some ****hole I doubt it
Omackeral wrote: » Great, another settled people dumping their rubbish on Traveller sites thread.
Roy Better Beam wrote: » That is the case down in Cork apparently.
Merrick Ancient Blood wrote: » Don't think anyone is saying it's a great life - just that those who think they are entitled to endless handouts instead of working have a disgusting attitude, particularly with how things are now, when those who work hard and pay their taxes and health insurance and put off having children and commute huge distances get **** all.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » It is a disgusting attitude but they will get nowhere forever Now the ones who can't work due to disability mental issues etc they are the ones who have my sympathy
Merrick Ancient Blood wrote: » Oh no question about that. It's only the freeloaders that people are complaining about.
Harry Palmr wrote: » I'd be thrilled to work 3 and get 3 handed to me (does it even work that way?)