FrancieBrady wrote: » Anybody hear Mairead McGuinness in the Euro parliament on RTE there? Seemed to be getting heckled by UK MEPs and let rip. I will look for a link to it.
Thargor wrote: » https://twitter.com/TomasBXL/status/1090646002137206785
Gintonious wrote: » That line at the end, absolute beauty! This is a perfect example of how the EU are having to deal with the Brits (generalization I know), they are the loud and disruptive kids in the classroom who used to think they were the centre of the world.
Itssoeasy wrote: » The head on Farage at the end was funny I have to say.
Shelga wrote: » How much of their fresh food does the UK import? Fruit, vegetables, meat, dairy, eggs etc- surely they produce a hell of a lot of this stuff themselves, and their internal market would grow, if farmers can no longer export as easily? Anyone have any statistics on this? Again, I think Brexit is completely moronic, but talk of people dying in their thousands is surely exaggeration?
The situation would be even more acute in March when British produce is out of season, with 90% of lettuces, 80% of tomatoes and 70% of soft fruit sourced from the EU at that time of year.
Paranoid Bob wrote: » ... all the UK govt has to do now is explain the alternative that does not require a hard border and everyone is happy!
jmayo wrote: » Our distribution network will have to be totally changed so instead of talking to Bob in Bolton would you rather deal with Michel in Lille ? Also a lot of our retail and indeed distribution players are UK owned and are sitting at the end of UK supply chains. Tesco, M&S, Currys, B&Q are retailers that automatically spring to mind. Even online retailers like Amazon.co.uk, Screwfix offering cheaper products are UK based and distribute out of there to here.
jmayo wrote: » Do the carriers have the ferries or ships or do you envisage diverting ships from UK routes ? Forgive me for being skeptical about plans from bureaucratic mega structures and from an entity that shafted us in the not too distant past. :rolleyes:
jmayo wrote: Have you ever been in Roscoff?
jmayo wrote: Ehh how long do you reckon will these developments take, to the nearest decade please as this is Ireland ?
jmayo wrote: Do you remember what happened last year when Irish Ferries tried to add new ferry to their France route?
jmayo wrote: Will we have to wait for ships to be built or can they be sourced from somewhere?
Varik wrote: » The direct sea route will take far longer. Dublin to Zeebrugge is 11 hours, without travelling through the UK that's goes up to 40 hours. Antwerp & Rotterdam are worse. For some reason Calais isn't being considered, the mayor there was very angry about it. Even Calais isn't' that much closer than Zeebrugge. The sea route is at best adding 20 hours to get to France.
Shelga wrote: » Turned on to Sky News in the middle of a woman in Sunderland saying she runs her own business and imports a niche, short-shelf-life product from Holland, and if there are delays at the ports for even 48 hours in the case of a no deal Brexit, she will be out of business. Presenter then says- “But you voted leave?”- her response was “yes, and I have absolutely no regrets about that.” These people are done for.
Gintonious wrote: » https://twitter.com/WyndhamWallace/status/1090688723371679744 The level of ignorance and stupidity continues to impress, and frighten.
Barclays is to move €190bn (£166bn) worth of assets from the UK to Ireland as the bank readies itself for a possible no-deal Brexit. The high court on Wednesday approved the lender’s Brexit contingency plans that include transferring the assets linked to about 5,000 of its clients to a Dublin-based unit. “Barclays will use our existing licensed EU-based bank subsidiary to continue to serve our clients within the EU beyond 29 March 2019 regardless of the outcome of Brexit,” the bank said. “Our preparations are well advanced and we expect to be fully operational by 29 March 2019.” Barclays will boost its Dublin headcount by about 150 to 300 as a result of the EU divorce.
Itssoeasy wrote: » So she voted to leave and in the event of a hard brexit there could be delays that would put her out of business yet she has no regrets about it ? As you say leave them off if they want to go over the cliff.
eggman100 wrote: » Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the name of this thread be, The Anti - Brexit Discussion Thread? Created for EU fans who want brexit cancelled?
First Up wrote: » More ships can be chartered if demand is there.