1641 wrote: » What is the premium for working Christmas - anyone know?
RacoonQueen wrote: » About the same as nursing but they're not the ones looking for pay rises so their gender is irrelevant in this. I'm the last person who would play the 'gender card', for the record, I'm the most anti-feminist female you could meet. Calling it the 'gender card' speaks volumes anyway.
Matt Barrett wrote: » He's some cheek.
average_runner wrote: » I don't know but they were interested spending their time on facebook and twitter than saving lives
turbbo wrote: » Yeah you do too with grammar like that :eek:
turbbo wrote: » Privatise the HSE - only way forward - thing is a beast that constantly needs to be fed. It goes from one crisis to another - it's not getting any better any time soon until something drastic is changed.
hawkelady wrote: » Surprised nobody has mentioned the fact that there is €2 million a week being spent on agency nurses !!
Matt Barrett wrote: » That's the plan. Let it run itself into the ground then give Denis a contract and it's jobs for our own.
theguzman wrote: » What about the literal billions dumped into the dark hole of adminsistation, crony managers and jobs for life. The HSE could function perfectly fine with at least 50,000 to 75,000 job cuts and just increase front line staff but trim out the fat. This will of course never happen which is why I favour privatisation.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » Yeah that’s the plan of course. And you accuse people of talking bull****.
Matt Barrett wrote: » The Blue shirt answer to everything is here. Oh Mr. Darcy, people will talk Two hard options: They are allowing it run to ground to enable 'looking after our own' as is their record. Or They are incompetent and incapable or unwilling to tackle it. Harris and Varadar trying to turn the public against Nurses and Midwives, gross Tory sh*te.
road_high wrote: » For me it’s simple economic responsibility- I don’t need FG or anyone else to tell me living beyond a countries tax take is insanity. Some of us look at the state revenue vs expenditure and know it’s obviously way out of line still and on very shaky ground with Brexit and all other uncertainty’s about. Nothing to do with turning against Nurses- many of them do a tough job in difficult circumstances- but so do so many other workers allover
Twenty Grand wrote: » Considering the HSE only employs 67,000 people I think 75,000 job cuts would leave it a tad understaffed.
brendanwalsh wrote: » They'll get what they want due to sheer numbers and if they cripple the system for long enough . The general public don't really hate nurses. The government should be more concerned about vacant consultant posts and junior doctors emigrating all the time and consultants who are not on specialist registrar. When the nurses get a rise, watch ever other ****er in the public sector go begging for one. We will end up in 2008 again if Leo doesn't stand firm. Nurses do a tough job, if they don't like the salary on offer they can and should go elsewhere. It's just business. If I didn't like the wages on offer from working in tesco, I wouldn't work in tesco. Why pay through the nose, plenty of foreign nurses willing to come here and are delighted with the salary.
iamwhoiam wrote: » They are going elsewhere . We are loosing nurses daily to UK , Australia , Dubai and Canada . And the queues of foreign nurses has slowed down now as they look to Dubai and Australia too
Deleted User wrote: » If they’ve funded their own education, then they are free to go wherever they want. However, if their qualifications were state funded via a grant, then they should be obliged to work in the NHS for a minimum of 3 years. The 13 hour day seriously needs looking at. It’s ridiculous to expect anyone to work such hours in such a vital job.
bri007 wrote: » Leo and Harris should use the 14.3 billion euro tax take from Apple and put it into the health service, starting with building the children’s hospital as planned and employ more frontline staff ie nursing etc.