Professor Moriarty wrote: » Only yesterday, The President of the EU told May that the WA would never be reopened unless she changed her red lines. Two hours later, she was telling the Commons that she would retain her red lines and renegotiate the WA.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » A hard Brexit would devastate NI. In 2016, NI exported 30% of its goods to Ireland. Ireland exported 1% (yes, that's right, one percent) of its goods to NI.
charlie14 wrote: » That is true, but when you consider what has taken place during that 18 month period with the DUP stance, a party that supported a Brexit vote and the UUP that opposed it, then it does not look as if there will be any change from the DUP being the largest NI loyalist party for the foreseeable future. That plus the fact that opinion polls are generally +/- 3% would mean that in essence that change in support of 5% is negligible.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » 5% is just the start. And remember, 5% constitutes 10% of the Unionist vote. Wait until their economy starts hurting from Brexit. Yes, the DUP will remain the largest party in the near future but my point is that the trend is shifting towards moderate unionism.
First Up wrote: » Raab telling a HoC committee we need to find a ladder for the Irish govt to climb down.
Tell me how wrote: » And moderate nationalism (as evidenced by fianna Fail) going in to a form of partnership with SDLP last week. I think after the dust settles on Brexit (which could be for a while yet) there will be a change in the political landscape in the North but while Brexit is ongoing, no one is really clamouring to get back in to Stormont.
Akrasia wrote: » Basically, as it comes closer to brexit day, there will be panic buying. People who can afford it will stockpile up on food, like they're already stockpiling medicines and the shelves will start to become empty in the weeks before brexit day.
Bambi wrote: » I'm sure there's an old saying somewhere that goes "When you've put your own neck in a noose it's not the time to be lending people your ladder"
ancapailldorcha wrote: » It can't be anything other than a stalling tactic. This way she gets to wait out the clock with a pretense of not doing so. It's all she can really do until the Tory factions show some sort of compromise.
Infini wrote: » Think the more correct term would be "Give a man enough rope and they'll hang themselves eventually". This can only go on for another 8 weeks before it backfires in the most spetacular fashion for the UK.
MPFGLB wrote: » Jeremy Corbyn is so behind the curve on Brexit ... Its pathetic to see him in the HoC asking his front bench questions as May talks so he can answer her ...he hasnt a clue Labour need to get him out and get Yvetter Cooper in Imagine if Labour had a real leader
MPFGLB wrote: » BTw Brexit has adversely effected me in London I work as a contractor and the number of contracts has nose dived since November Also the value of my flat has nose dived by 35%...I was hoping to sell and move on
Havockk wrote: » That's an utter simplistic reading of what his actual on teh ground problems are. Not every labour supporter is in favour of the likes of a 'peoples vote'
gmisk wrote: » If you are expecting any kind of rhyme or reason from the DUP and more specifically Sammy (get the ethnics out) Wilson you will be disapponted, remember he was an environmental minister who doesn't believe in global warming, a fair amount of them are also into creationism. Oh and one of them as recently as 2016 didn't know heterosexuals could contract HIV.... Arlene should have walked after the cash for ash scandal but didn't, Ian Paisley junior seems to get regular paid trips around the world for him and his family and is still there. Thankfully there general voting base are old and getting older.
RobMc59 wrote: » I despair following the events of last night and hope the EU does as it`s said and send TM packing. There is the small matter though that as recently as last week the EU were lampooning TM saying"tell us what you want,what you really,really want"-was this just that or a genuine attempt for clarification?
bob mcbob wrote: » SO TM goes to Brussels and says give me something on the backstop and either - a - EU makes some fuzzy statement about the backstop, TM declares it a victory and the Brexiteers swing behind TM at the next vote. b - EU does nothing, Brexiteers blink first see (a) c - EU does nothing, Brexiteers don't blink, TM's deal is voted down again. Grieve and Coopers amendments come up again - they succeed then HoC moves for cross party agreement for a softer Brexit
WomanSkirtFan8 wrote: » Heardvit. The woman is just as delusional ad the rest of the UK. Tried to talk down. To this country as well. Bad move edwina! You should really know better than that.
downcow wrote: » I promised to send yous a link to this mornings nolan. Normally a very diverse set of callers. I have listened 40 mins in and every single NI caller so far wants uk to stand firm even that means no deal. Callers have included farmers and fishermen. So maybe I am more reflective of views up north than you thinkhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00026qr
Bambi wrote: » Actually a legal type gave me one about defendants refusing to engage with the process: "When they see the Gallows they change their tune" No sign of that thus far
downcow wrote: » I promised to send yous a link to this mornings nolan. Normally a very diverse set of callers. I have listened 40 mins in and every single NI caller so far wants uk to stand firm even that means no deal. Callers have included farmers and fishermen. So maybe I am more reflective of views up north than you think I think the referendum result in Northern Ireland is the best reflection of what the views of people up North are, rather than a radio phone in show. That was 56% to remain and 44% to leave if memory serves me right. It roughly broke down to the same old historical voting patterns(Normal people and headcases).