sophiexyz wrote: » None what so ever, i'd assume thats because he come from the same christian background as Swedish natives, same morals, ethics, interests, he just had to learn the language and he was one of them, Swedish wife and children.
sophiexyz wrote: » She is not in the wrong regarding this case, no wonder the powers that be ridicule her, she is exposing their lies
backspin. wrote: » You are right Soros is indeed anti-Semitic. He helped confiscate property from Jews during WW2 and described those days as the best in his life.
Kroft: “My understanding is that you went … went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.” Soros: “Yes, that’s right. Yes.” Kroft: “I mean, that’s — that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?” Soros: “Not, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t … you don’t see the connection. But it was — it created no — no problem at all.” Kroft: “No feeling of guilt?” Soros: “No.” Kroft: “For example, that, ‘I’m Jewish, and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be these, I should be there.’ None of that?” Soros: “Well, of course, … I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was — well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in the markets — that if I weren’t there — of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would — would — would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the — whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the — I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.“
Stephen15 wrote: » So I take it George Soros is great according to you. He's hardly feckin Mother Thresa now is he?
lbc2019 wrote: » The childs relations not happy- Same with Fr Molloy. She is a bandwagon jumper
Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo wrote: » I don't understand why people can't be against fluoride being added to drinking water on ethical grounds. The science is no way near complete enough that anyone can say with absolute certainty of whether it is a good or bad thing to do.
In the Republic there is a decay rate of one tooth per child compared to over two in Northern Ireland, one of the worst in Europe.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Which conspiracy theories have become facts?
debok wrote: » In fairness the child's relations wouldn't be happy when they were probably involved in it and the doc supports that theory. Some of the family are happy with it who weren't involved in it
debok wrote: » What can be called a conspiracy theory? Like for years where I lived there was rumours of a paedophile in the area. But the gardai said it was just rumors and people making up stories. Some said at the time the gardai covered it up because of who he was and anyone that went against this was called mad or crackpot. The paedophile is in jail now but 25 years too late.
batgoat wrote: » A person basically reusing nazi era anti semetic conspiracies is not comparable. In relation to her crime solving, she's behaved abysmally towards both families of those victims. This is verifiable.
batgoat wrote: » In addition to this, Soros warned Jewish families of impending capture. Pretty shameful to lie about his background. .
sophiexyz wrote: » Have you seen Surviving R.KELLY? Man raped 14 year old, possibly younger, on video tape, family denied it happened, did money change hands?
debok wrote: » You replying to me? Anyway if I murdered my niece and got away with it for years I wouldn't be happy with a reporter asking me about it.i would probably feign outrage and go to Garda who helped cover it up and then I'd call the reporter batshyte crazy
sophiexyz wrote: » youtu.be/W8Id0-Lsyr0 George Soros admits Nazi collaboration with no regrets, yea he's a good guy.
sophiexyz wrote: » Do you not believe the media over here is controlled? IMF in Dublin all over Sky,BBC News, RTE not a peep! Stories about the church for years, we now know many where true.
batgoat wrote: » The Molloy family have complained about her behaviour. In relation to the Boyle family, the person who she attacked was from the "Justice For Mary Boyle" group and was from the other side of the family. Even believes in her conclusions but thinks she's made it into a self promotion itemhttps://twitter.com/joecraig79/status/1086102537739091968?s=19https://twitter.com/joecraig79/status/1052246570228469761?s=19 Also tried to hijack the Molloy case as demonstrated here. He has lots of posts about her behaviour...https://twitter.com/BillMaher1/status/1086984664634609664?s=19 Yes I quoted the interview. He said he had to see possessions being taken off families. He did not participate in it and had to hide that he was Jewish to survive. You also conveniently ignored that he warned Jewish families of imminent capture..
debok wrote: » She probably has made it into self promotion to make a living because she will never get back in the mainstream. But the thing is a lot of people in Ireland never heard of Mary Boyle until the doc. I just wish they could solve it no matter who done it.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » I'm not sure that media control by O'Reilly or O'Brien constitutes a conspiracy. Yes, there is a connection between RTE and the government that funds them, that's for sure. There was rumours of a paedophile in an organisation I was involved in many years ago. Everybody knew, but nobody knew any specifics. Specific and very credible allegations have emerged in recent years, though Gardai have declined to prosecute. On the broader issue, there may well have been something stinky about the Boyle and Molloy cases in those days. But have any modern day conspiracy theories come through? Most of the stuff that Gemma comes out with is indeed batsh1t crazy.
debok wrote: » Is there any real long term benefit to adding it ?Americans laugh at our teeth anyway?!!Surely every country would add if it was doing somethin. Knowing Ireland there s probably few lads making a few quid off it so it can't be stopped
lbc2019 wrote: » Does it not make you gay? One crank said they were adding Oestrogen to the water supply which made the lads gay! Christian Democrats or some bint on Vinny Browne debates!!!
Birneybau wrote: » Alex Jones reckons America water made the frogs (actual frogs) gay
WinnyThePoo wrote: » Actually Alex Jones said gay. Unless changing from male to female is considered gay.
paleoperson wrote: » Believe it or not but that one is actually kind of true! They are having terrible problems with xenooestrogens (mimicking females hormones) in the American water supply being catastrophic for amphibian reproductive systems. They are being born with shrunken or absent testes, penises and without any behavioural desire for sex with females. It can even cause sex reversal, it also drastically affects other marine life. It's a real disastrous situation and does not deserve to be laughed at. Pollutants in the water are not controlled properly at all. Also human testosterone level have been dropping DRAMATICALLY in the past two decades. Just because it's a conspiracy kook like Alex Jones pointing to it for his own ends doesn't make it automatically wrong, it's actually real.https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070228091721.htmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imposex
9. The government is using chemicals to turn people and frogs gay. What do frogs and people have in common besides occasionally wearing top hats? As Jones has claimed, both are supposedly the victims of so-called "estrogen mimickers" being placed in juice boxes, water bottles, and tap water to "feminize" people. Writing for Salon, Alex Seitz-Wald quoted Jones as saying, "The reason there are so many gay people now is because it's a chemical warfare operation. I have the government documents where they said they're going to encourage homosexuality with chemicals so people don't have children." Jones has described tap water as a "gay bomb" and has said "I don't like 'em putting chemicals in the water that TURN THE FREAKIN' FROGS GAY! Do you understand that? I'm sick of being social engineered, it's not funny!" Why this claim is ridiculous: Indeed, socially engineering Jones would not be funny and probably would not be the best use of limited government resources. I don't know what government documents Jones is referring to, but drinking lots of tap or bottled water may make you pee but it will not "turn you gay." Not that there is anything wrong with that. And why exactly did Jones mention "gay frogs"? Perhaps Jones was referring to a study from the University of California, Berkeley, which suggested that exposure to atrazine, a widely used pesticide, may cause gender-switching among frogs. But then he would be misinterpreting the results of that study. Gender switching is not the same as sexual preference. Exposing frogs to atrazine is not the same as giving them drinking water. And frogs usually don't drink juice boxes. Oh, and by the way, Jones' Infowars site is selling water filtration devices.
Mrs Shuttleworth wrote: » I had never heard of Gemma until a few weeks ago. Numbers listening and reading to alternative social media and news media are growing. The mainstream media bias and abuse of people with differing viewpoints, particularly since the Trump election, creates a vacuum in which O'Doherty and Waters can create the illusion of a glamorous underground resistance which is dangerously addictive and lures vulnerable people in. Comments such as "tin foil hat", "fruitcake" etc are counterproductive in that immediately you wonder what arguments are being made that are so outrageous and want to find out.
paleoperson wrote: » WinnyThePoo wrote: » Actually Alex Jones said gay. Unless changing from male to female is considered gay. Homosexuality has been linked with lower male hormones compared to female ones, especially prenatally when the brain is in a sensitive developmental phase. So when you connect the dots his claims, while perhaps crude, are right. Though they could do with some improving Jones' claims on frogs are not an unreasonable picture of reality (unlike for example the Sandy Hook conspiracy). I'd give him a "mostly true".
