Deebles McBeebles wrote: » What was the story with the marriage on Jan 8th? A poster mentioned it a while back but I don't think anything was clarified but it supposedly involved Maggie's fella (and presumably Maggie).
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » I did find this weirdness though. Seriously, the further down you scroll, the weirder it gets.https://www.dreshare.com/margaret-cash/
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » Dafuq?
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » Went looking for info on this and found nothing so looks like BS unless someone can clarify with any FB updates? I did find this weirdness though. Seriously, the further down you scroll, the weirder it gets.https://www.dreshare.com/margaret-cash/
Love to do: Shopping and travelling.
sligojoek wrote: » I had a good laugh at this one.
Dante7 wrote: » She won't get a five bedroomed house. The tide has turned after the Casey vote and the council are now emboldened to tell her to **** off, in the knowledge that the public are behind them. She would be well advised to grab a three bedroomed house if it was offered, while there are plenty of working people on the housing list who have paid income tax.
Deleted User wrote: » How did they figure out her bra size?
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » Looks like nonsense to me. AFAIK, there is no such thing as bra size 33B. The band size in inches is always an even number.
sexmag wrote: » It's written by an illiterate and has grammar and spelling errors so one would assume she wrote it herself. Also she can't be divorced unless first of all she was officially married and not traveller married and then separated for 4 years and she's up there commenting on his photo with hearts etc so it hasn't been long, all bull for the media
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » That page seems to be a combination of facts gleaned from newspaper articles and make-believe. I don't think she wrote this herself. As for her marriage, it's unclear to me whether she and her "husband" are actually married or just long-time cohabitants. She is Cash and he is McCarthy -- why didn't she change her name, as most Travellers do?
Vicarious Function wrote: » Why is this thread still up and running? Does any human being deserve public shaming at this level?
Vicarious Function wrote: » Why is this thread still up and running? Does any human being deserve public shaming at this level? Roll on legislation that will deal with social media that can behave in this way. Shame on you, Boards.ie.
Vicarious Function wrote: Why is this thread still up and running? Does any human being deserve public shaming at this level?
KrustyUCC wrote: » That same person was able to afford a €600 communion suit for her son before she appears in court over stealing €300 worth of clothes from Pennys Plenty of her antics well worth discussing
Vicarious Function wrote: » The title of this thread has to do with a single incident which happened three months ago and was dealt with legally. End of! Who has the right to continually drag this out day after day in social media? This person is being victimized unfairly on this forum. Get a life, you people.
Vicarious Function wrote: » The fact a person has been through the courts for an offense ought to enough - not the continuous naming and shaming that goes on here. Who gives people the right to treat another human being like that?