malinheader wrote: » What's wrong with making it in your school uniform.
Mundo7976 wrote: » A: The church has enough of its own money to be able to afford some leeway towards disadvantaged people. B: Sure why dont we subsidise sky and mobiles and nights out etc C: ...null
BattleCorp wrote: » Many retailers sell first communion dresses very very cheap. That's all that's needed for girls obviously. The lads are even easier to dress. No need for an allowance for bouncy castles.
crossman47 wrote: » Mundo7976 wrote: » A: The church has enough of its own money to be able to afford some leeway towards disadvantaged people. B: Sure why dont we subsidise sky and mobiles and nights out etc C: ...null The catholic church tries to discourage parents from lavish spending. They want the money for themselves.
Prince William wrote: » I think the payment should be reinstated so that disadvantaged people won't have to resort to moneylenders
lbc2019 wrote: » Or they could cut their cloth according to their measure. Or ask the church- it’s their gig
Elmo wrote: » No. I think even people who are very religious don't agree with that payment. Your talking about The Catholic Church and The Church of Ireland only AFAIK.
BrokenArrows wrote: » No absolutely not. A religious ceremony has nothing to do with the state anymore.
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » And think of all the communion dresses sitting in closets. My communion dress had been worn by my sister and two cousins before me. It was still in perfect condition and I didn’t feel any less like a princess just because it was a hand-me-down. I actually like the tradition of dresses being worn by various family members. My mother and her sister shared their wedding dress even!
corner of hells wrote: » Please say you're male.
Prince William wrote: » A social welfare payment of €250 used to be available to unemployed people who had a child doing their first communion but it was cut 66% in 2012 and completely abolished in 2013 because of the recession. Now the the economy has improved, I think the payment should be reinstated so that disadvantaged people won't have to resort to moneylenders
Matt Barrett wrote: » A hard no. We should not be funding anything to do with makey up ceremonies. Especially those associated with an organisation that protects criminals.
Billy86 wrote: » Round up everyone against repealing the 8th and let them pay for it.