nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

marieholmfan

Itssoeasy wrote: »

No it hasn't.

She said it had been.

lbc2019

marieholmfan wrote: »

Itssoeasy wrote: »

No it hasn't.

She said it had been.

Was it George Soros? Or the ghost of Veronica? Maybe unicorns?

marieholmfan

Apparently twitter is very pro trans [and as Gemma doesn't [/SIZE]believe in trans rights ... You do the maths

Pa8301 wrote: »

Repeatedly?

donaghs

pjohnson wrote: »

Shes anti-immigration, anti-vax and anti-abortion. She'd have polled well in the election tbh.

Can't say I agree with all her positions but to say the she (or most people) are "anti-immigration" is a misnomer.
She appears to be against "open borders".

Rather than allowing immigration, but having a agreed system of who is allowed in, and having checks in place. We have that to some extent. A fairly reasonable position?

The open borders things has gotten a lot more traction due to all the "refugee crisis" stories in recent years.

Itssoeasy

marieholmfan wrote: »

She said it had been.

So she said it was so is it ? Right okay then. That's not how it works.

Pa8301

marieholmfan wrote: »

The absurd libel laws in Ireland which require one to prove the truth of one's statements make it impossible to say anything other than the cozy consensus.

It's a disgrace Joe.

lbc2019

donaghs wrote: »

pjohnson wrote: »

Shes anti-immigration, anti-vax and anti-abortion. She'd have polled well in the election tbh.

Can't say I agree with all her positions but to say the she (or most people) are "anti-immigration" is a misnomer.
She appears to be against "open borders".

Rather than allowing immigration, but having a agreed system of who is allowed in, and having checks in place. We have that to some extent. A fairly reasonable position?

The open borders things has gotten a lot more traction due to all the "refugee crisis" stories in recent years.

Her statements on Twitter are a bit more than issues with “open borders” - they are downright xenophobic

listermint

CrankyHaus wrote: »

You'd be surprised. While it's outside the overton window on a national level there are some Councillors, generally SF/Left, happy to push it direct to their constituents through social media. They wouldn't be doing this if they didn't think there were some votes in it.

My GF works in a maternity hospital and says a surprising amount of the midwives are anti-vaxxers.

Reads like a daily mail headline. I know midwives and they're not. An unsurprising amount are level headed sane rational people.

listermint

Someone told Gemma she could make money off being this way. A kind of alternative piers Morgan. And she continues on as is.

Its not really rocket science

Wibbs

I haven't gotten past the unicorns tweet. Da fuq?

donaghs

lbc2019 wrote: »

Her statements on Twitter are a bit more than issues with “open borders” - they are downright xenophobic

I'll have to bow to your superior knowledge on this. I just can't stomach more than a few lines of twitter.

Technocentral

suicide_circus wrote: »

progressive conservatism

Hilarious! Talk about a oxymoron!!

Mad_maxx

She is a hate figure for the PC Left, don't know that much about her but anyone who kitty Holland is at war with, can't be all that bad

ohnonotgmail

marieholmfan wrote: »

Why hasn't Veronica Guerin been disinterred to see if she was pregnant with one of the Haugheys' babies?

Why aren't you campaigning for the exhumation of Veronica Guerin Dav3?

The absurd libel laws in Ireland which require one to prove the truth of one's statements make it impossible to say anything other than the cozy consensus.

Stupid crazy libel laws that stop you telling lies about people.

mcmoustache

lbc2019 wrote: »

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

I think it all started when she watched a video of Joe Rogan's show on youtube. It was probably something innocent like the Leah Remini or something. Then when it was over and she looked at her suggestions, she most likely saw some Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro and Infowars stuff and took a gander. Next thing you know she starts filling her head with those "Conservative DESTROYS pink-haired lesbian with FACTS and LOGIC" videos while tweeting about vaccines. It happens more often than you think.

dav3

marieholmfan wrote: »

Why hasn't Veronica Guerin been disinterred to see if she was pregnant with one of the Haugheys' babies?

Why aren't you campaigning for the exhumation of Veronica Guerin Dav3?

The absurd libel laws in Ireland which require one to prove the truth of one's statements make it impossible to say anything other than the cozy consensus.

You can't even have a good old fashioned conspiracy theory rant these days with little or no evidence to back it up, without some snowflake becoming outraged. It's PC gone mad!

lbc2019

Mad_maxx wrote: »

She is a hate figure for the PC Left, don't know that much about her but anyone who kitty Holland is at war with, can't be all that bad

My enemy’s enemy is my friend ?

marieholmfan

lbc2019 wrote: »

Her statements on Twitter are a bit more than issues with “open borders” - they are downright xenophobic

She's clearly slipping into mentally illness.
Whatever the 'truth' of her 'position' on transgender related issues (and I would suggest that she is 'not even wrong' the obsession with transgender issues (unless you are personally or familially affected) is almost certainly an sign that you are 'losing it'.

An obsession with the Jews is another indicator; but transgender issues seem quite similar.

marieholmfan

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Stupid crazy libel laws that stop you telling lies about people.

They don't just stop people telling lies ; they stop us saying things that we 'reckon' or that we believe unless we can actually prove their truth (unless the person is dead).

Mr. Incognito

I dont have twitter

Its a platform for vacous idiots.

I have a dream that all rational people leave twitter and just let the trolls have at each other.

I have no idea why the media report gob****es opinions from twitter as if its news

Hurrache

marieholmfan wrote: »

They don't just stop people telling lies ; they stop us saying things that we 'reckon' or that we believe unless we can actually prove their truth (unless the person is dead).

So you're saying it should be ok to say whatever you want about a person without being able to prove what you're saying?

Mr. Incognito wrote: »

I dont have twitter

Its a platform for vacous idiots.

Easily avoidable and it's then a great platform for information etc.

ohnonotgmail

marieholmfan wrote: »

They don't just stop people telling lies ; they stop us saying things that we 'reckon' or that we believe unless we can actually prove their truth (unless the person is dead).

Hurrache wrote: »

So you're saying it should be ok to say whatever you want about a person without being able to prove what you're saying?

what Hurrache said.

marieholmfan

Hurrache wrote: »

So you're saying it should be ok to say whatever you want about a person without being able to prove what you're saying?

About a public figure ; basically yes.
Belief should be a defense to libel of a public figure.

Pa8301

marieholmfan wrote: »

About a public figure ; basically yes.
Belief should be a defense to libel of a public figure.

That is moronic.

ohnonotgmail

Pa8301 wrote: »

That is moronic.

it is much worse than that.

marieholmfan

Pa8301 wrote: »

That is moronic.

I don't think so. Current bar is clearly too high. Papers should be able to publish credible allegations of corruption against named individuals etc. without being sued. Even if they make an honest mistake.

Hurrache

marieholmfan wrote: »

About a public figure ; basically yes.
Belief should be a defense to libel of a public figure.

You're off the wall today, I thought you couldn't beat your post this morning about the UK threatening nuclear retaliation on the board of Airbus in the Brexit thread.

klaaaz

Mad_maxx wrote: »

She is a hate figure for the PC Left, don't know that much about her but anyone who kitty Holland is at war with, can't be all that bad

She's a poster girl for the right wingers, a figure to be laughed at with her loonie views.

padd b1975

Mad_maxx wrote: »

She is a hate figure for the PC Left, don't know that much about her but anyone who kitty Holland is at war with, can't be all that bad

Normally I would agree.
However, she's now mooching around the Ben Gilroy mob, so that kills it for me.

Franz Von Peppercorn

listermint wrote: »

Someone told Gemma she could make money off being this way. A kind of alternative piers Morgan. And she continues on as is.

Its not really rocket science

How is she making money?