Fourier wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFrHWLHPQrg
New Home wrote: » Not if you have to go to the local fountain or stream to get it, then heat it, and you have to fill a tub that's, what, 80 litres?
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » And you would have to fetch the wood for the fire as well before you started.
Chancer3001 wrote: » Well yeah. But they generally had a fire going every single day anyways. Not just for bath day . Fire was there. Heat a pot of water over it
New Home wrote: Not if you have to go to the local fountain or stream to get it, then heat it, and you have to fill a tub that's, what, 80 litres?
Chancer3001 wrote: » I'm sure there's a bit of work involved. But 5 or 6 big buckets from the nearest water source would be grand. Pribabaly only have to boil one buckets worth to make it warm
Ted_YNWA wrote: » And it's a 6 mile walk to get it. Uphill in both directions.
New Home wrote: » If you have one part of boiling water and add two parts of cold water you get water that's approx. 33 degrees Celsius, less than body temperature, and therefore it would be perceived as barely lukewarm.
Water John wrote: » Having grown up in a rural house without a washing machine, I remember wash day (clothes). Large fire going that day, boiling a big pots of water.
Chancer3001 wrote: » Pretty sure swimming pools are only around 28. 33 be grand
rgmmg wrote: » Am sure this may have been covered elsewhere but, prior to the French Revolution, the Ace was the lowest value card in a deck of cards i.e. 1. Post the Revolution, the common man was seen as above Royalty, so the lowly Ace was re-ranked to be higher than the King.
MonkieSocks wrote: » Here are some facts about the year 1500: They used to use urine to tan animal skins, so families used to all peein a pot & then once a day it was taken & sold to the tannery....... if you had to do this to survive you were "Piss Poor" ______________________________________________ But worse than that were the really poor folk who couldn't even afford to buy a pot........... they "didn’t have a pot to piss in" and were the lowest of the low. ______________________________________________
mzungu wrote: » Above is the Irukandji jellyfish (found on the coast of Queensland, Australia)
topmanamillion wrote: » While some of the others are dubious at best this one stood out to me as a myth. The expression piss-poor is recent and has nothing to do with tanning. The current state of research suggests that it may have been invented during the Second World War, because the first examples in print date from 1946. Though it is still classed as low slang by dictionaries, its mildly unpleasant associations have become blunted by time and familiarity. The origin is straightforward. Piss began to be attached to other words during the twentieth century to intensify their meaning. Ezra Pound invented piss-rotten in 1940 (distasteful or unpleasant, the first example on record) and we’ve since had piss-easy (very easy), piss-weak (cowardly or pathetic), piss-elegant (affectedly refined, pretentious), piss-awful (very unpleasant) and other forms.
New Home wrote: » More here.