Necro wrote: » Ah look Stu, you're correct in saying we should have clarified at the time of the reveal. As I said in the backroom you guys probably give me too much credit for crazy complexities such as the Gollum/hydra role you devised - I'm jealous of that btw :pac: We didn't expect the players to go into deep tunnel mode on what else could be in the game based off Bombadil, so I apologise for that, it's on me primarily.
fixxxer wrote: » Sorry Stu, I'm speaking for the group when I shouldn't. I'd been reading background stuff on LotR and saw a few things on Tom that had mentioned a theory that he was (a? The?) God and could have intervened but chose not to. It was fresh in my mind and made perfect sense with what I saw in have.
Necro wrote: » Yeah they can be viewable on the server, I'm interested in if it might work actually, might be a nice change.Only issue for a read back is you'd likely have to scroll all the way to the beginning of each page which might be a pain but it's definitely worth a shot to see how it goes.
fixxxer wrote: » Re: Discord for backrooms, is there a way to archive or view the rooms for after the game? My guilty pleasure is reading through the backrooms after, so would be a shame to lose that.
Necro wrote: » Yeah they can be viewable on the server, I'm interested in if it might work actually, might be a nice change. Only issue for a read back is you'd likely have to scroll all the way to the beginning of each page which might be a pain but it's definitely worth a shot to see how it goes.
sKeith wrote: » Our ww games are played in public. At the moment we enjoy semi privacy on COP, its not public, but open to the community. If we use discord it too would be semi private. But, to relieve the pain of scrolling back, be could extract the chat to a file, we could share/ archive here on boards, but the chats would be public then.https://github.com/Tyrrrz/DiscordChatExporter
Pter wrote: » Yep wont be an issue in terms of achieving that. Only issue is that since we will have a couple of different platforms (COP and discord), not all of the game backrooms will be in the 1 spot. Cant be avoided if we are looking at COP alternatives, however.
Necro wrote: » We were just talking about this, the post rate was very manageable in this game actually which I think made it a better game all round? Note to future self LOL! Yeah open voting is something I considered, the issue (as with FFAs) is that if you put down a format for submitting and some people inevitably don't follow it, it might lead to issues in counting the votes. But I'm considering trialling it in the future to see if it works. Hard luck btw, I really did think if the vig didn't shoot you this morning you had a massive chance, unfortunately it wasn't to be. You did well! As did all the evil teams tbf.
tritium wrote: » I really enjoyed that game. My only real gripe is work and rl meant I didn’t participate anywhere near as much as I wished I could, but thems the breaks. Some general thoughts: 1. I loved the majority vote idea. It takes the pressure off for speed days and adds a really interesting element. It also has real potential to be used tactically by any side - in this game a villager voted for themselves to bring down the hammer I think. I’ve seen wolves do the same force a level of momentum. 2. It struck me at one point In this game just how much the night phase can benefit village. It enables everything from 9.59 reveals to a more reasoned review of the day. I do think it would be useful to try a game with no night posting- might have to be an honor system for a trial but I’d be interesting to see how it played out. 3. The convert mechanic is really cool. It’s probably more balanced than I expected but still pretty powerful. Still haven’t checked backrroms to see why Sam didn’t join the cult (without becoming nazgul) though 4. Pretty balanced game overall. It swung on a couple of key moments, and the ring, perhaps appropriately proved the key element. If I was being picky I’d say the rings power should have died fully with Sauron but it’s no biggie either way.
Digital Solitude wrote: » Yeah the open voting here would be a bit of a ball's, didn't Shatter and Jayop do it for G2 though?
Pter wrote: » Its a good idea but why not just have a separate voting thread where people vote within a post. (i.e. #votebanjo) No chat, so the only thing that goes in there is votes; that way they dont get lost in the main thread, its all open for everyone to view, and there isnt a different thread for each lynch. If you want to do 1 vote, no takebacks, you can; if you want to do vote as much as you want, you can.
quickbeam wrote: » Speaking of cannon, Hobbits can’t become Nazgul.
Necro wrote: » According to the film, when Frodo was stabbed with the Morgul Blade, he would have turned into one but for the intervention of the elves But that's for another thread
Kolido wrote: » Was that the first anon game where no one did a pter?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Haha I read either Gabriel or Gertrude post in game that hobbits can't become Nazgul, and I wanted to post pretty much what you just said Necro. However...if you Wiki the lore, there's arguments for both - 'Nazgul' - aren't they the souls of the original nine men who were given rings? So therefore, Frodo would have just become a wraith in Fellowship and not not a Nazgul? Anyway, guess this is for another thread as you said, but I wasn't confident enough in game to put up the Dwight Shrute 'Wrong!' post :pac:
Pter wrote: » Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo discord was blocked in work over Xmas
Mollyb60 wrote: » Yeah discord is blocked for me too in work. And I HATE typing on my phone with a passion. I'll make it work if that's where we're going but I would be opposed to the move.
Necro wrote: » By a more technical minded person than me I was told that the issues with COP are probably founded in the machine it's being run by, which unfortunately is out of our control. If we had someone good with tech and the likes, it may be possible to create a COP clone however...
Digital Solitude wrote: » As in the hardware isn't up to scratch? I wonder can you use AWS for a basic bbcode forum