Goldengirl wrote: » You're the mod of this thread, are you? So it's ok to allow this nasty diatribe go on for weeks on end? What do you think, it's free speech? Its hate speech , and anti traveller, and anyone who believes in spreading this muck deserves to be reported and fined.
Goldengirl wrote: » Fire extinguishers were useless as they were already un conscious except for the young lad who tried but couldn't use them. Fire hydrant had no water pressure. The person who changed the smoke alarm to a heat sensor was wrong, and the council should have checked the site after it became obvious it was no longer emergency accommodation but a settlement with families.I can't accept the blasé attitude that says this is " all the travellers fault" , and that's being charitable. Provision of emergency accomodation for anyone in the country,needs to meet safety standards. I do not think this is negotiable. It is not negotiable if you or I are building a house , so why is it ok for a halting site?
Ruraldweller56 wrote: » 100%. Pablo Escobar was settled look at him. Al Capone. Tony Soprano. All settled folk. And look at their behaviour. Settled people are the scourge of humanity.
I see sheep wrote: » In the world? I'd say there's millions of settled people involved in crime so I'd say they just about shade it.
pah wrote: » It would seem that there are as many settled people involved in crime as travellers, wouldn't you agree?
I see sheep wrote: » My Granny had a mobile home once but that was 20 years ago, haven't been in one since. I'd say it's be good craic travelling around Europe in one though, I might look into it, cheers.
Deleted User wrote: » Your caravan has been clamped.
I see sheep wrote: » https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/mother-who-stole-up-to-395k-from-credit-union-took-out-false-loans-on-members-accounts-898003.html More disgraceful behaviour by the settled community .. terrible culture of scamming money in the settled community
facehugger99 wrote: » Daily Fail article gets the mouth-breathers frothing. Quelle surprise.
rafatoni wrote: » your lot at it again in the UKhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6599255/Sex-attacker-molested-83-year-old-woman-tried-kidnap-girl-15.html
KrustyUCC wrote: » Some interesting comments from Margaret in this post as well. Always good to play the 'race' cardhttps://m.facebook.com/groups/124476511495850?view=permalink&id=334294743847358
ShaneC93 wrote: » How dare the SDCC make Margaret wait potentially another 2 whole years for a free house :mad: :mad: :mad:
saintsaltynuts wrote: » Hope She Gets F~ck All For Another 12 Years.Make an example out of her.
Ray Palmer wrote: » Why won't you talk about other minorities and how they should be treated? The beggars choosers argument, I got it very straight forward some would say childish. Answered that several times we are obliged to under our policies. Putting feuding families together is madness. The do checks on this stuff for council housing for non-travellers BTW Now do you want to explain what level of protections minorities should be given? General explanation of when it is OK because I am not sure what level I should be aiming at to be like you.
padd b1975 wrote: » Filmer Paradise wrote: » Also, it seems like all the adults involved were drunk or stoned or both. None of them seemed to be able to operate the fully working fire extinguishers made available to them(by the council?). Seems like they want to blame everybody else no matter what. There's no point "putting in a claim" if you've already admitted to being responsible.
Filmer Paradise wrote: » Also, it seems like all the adults involved were drunk or stoned or both. None of them seemed to be able to operate the fully working fire extinguishers made available to them(by the council?). Seems like they want to blame everybody else no matter what.
tretorn wrote: » [/B] Hmm, exactly. If you have one child and no education and no job and no income other than state benefits then for the love of God get yourself some contraception. If you throw filth and waste around the environment where you live then you will live in filth. If you have a feud with someone and you cant afford to house your own family elsewhere then dont leave whatever accommodation you have and drag your children to the side of the road. Dont whine about taking your children to a school miles away if you have left accommodation or have refused accomodation because it isnt located where you want to live, beggars cant be choosers and all that.
Ray Palmer wrote: » Why won't you talk about other minorities and how they should be treated?The beggars choosers argument, I got it very straight forward some would say childish. Answered that several times we are obliged to under our policies. Putting feuding families together is madness. The do checks on this stuff for council housing for non-travellers BTW Now do you want to explain what level of protections minorities should be given? General explanation of when it is OK because I am not sure what level I should be aiming at to be like you.
Carrickmines killings was no accident in where the government could had saved the lives of ten people including a unborn baby. Year after year the victims had begged their local authority for safe accommodation and only 2 be laughed at, if only racisim was not a issue. If this was a private company, public service sector or most any other set-up there might be hope for justice, unfortunately where government is implicit and involved, it's unlikely that justice will ever be got. RIP Gods Angles ��
Goldengirl wrote: » Fire extinguishers were useless as they were already un conscious Fire hydrant had no water pressure.
Goldengirl wrote: » The person who changed the smoke alarm to a heat sensor was wrong,
How some members of the Settled community can treat poor little innocent plants in this way is cruel and heartless. suffocating them in space and you talk about Travellers. fly with the stars little innocent plants.
Goldengirl wrote: » 1 Fire extinguishers were useless as they were already un conscious except for the young lad who tried but couldn't use them. Fire hydrant had no water pressure. 2 The person who changed the smoke alarm to a heat sensor was wrong, and the council should have checked the site after it became obvious it was no longer emergency accommodation but a settlement with families.I can't accept the blasé attitude that says this is 3 " all the travellers fault" , and that's being charitable. Provision of emergency accomodation for anyone in the country,needs to meet safety standards. I do not think this is negotiable. It is not negotiable if you or I are building a house , so why is it ok for a halting site?
Ray Palmer wrote: » I have rented to people on social welfare payments and taken rent allowance. My properties are all above the limits so no longer do. You called me a liberal and are just wrong and have failed to understand a word I said. I can assure the way you speak I am fully aware you don't earn more than me. I pay a lot of taxes as a landlord and am not so protective about being proud of buying my own house as some massive achievement to lord over people like you have. Have you got kids?
ShaneC93 wrote: » Before today it looked like she was confident of getting a house this month, must have had some bad news recently. The having a lot of kids choice is probably the thing that's actually done her bad in the end because unlike 10-years ago, the councils don't tend to build bigger council homes anymore. Even 4-beds are a rarity, usually only when they're gotten through compulsary purchases of new-build developments. From the many comments on furniture posts from the past couple of weeks, it seems she actually has a lot to her name that she was planning to use to satisfy a very expensive taste in furnishings! Again, spending loads on anything but accomodation appears to be the goal!
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/892f365931e5cb4ba5c9d4ce2c7da299.svg)
