Margaret Cash steals €300 worth of clothes from Penneys and aftermath/etc!

tuxy wrote: »

How the hell did they cause this much chaos in just one week?

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/01/rowdy-tourists-group-served-deportation-notice-may-be-banned-from-new-zealand-for-5-years.html

Who says travellers are lazy, eh?

Keatsian wrote: »

The thread is full of vicious personal attacks. The poster you’re responding to wasn’t even directing their comments at you in the first place. It isn’t about whether one particular poster has ever called her x, y, or z, but that the forum hosts a thread with what must number hundreds of nasty personal comments about a named individual.

Exactly - named, based on her own behaviour, that she revels in, and posts about to social media, where she says vicious things herself. On top of her exploitation of social welfare (taking it from those who actually need it) she is a convicted criminal.

Why this concern more about stuff said on the internet than the appalling behaviour in question and disregard for others? It's like it's just arguing for the sake of it.

tuxy

freshpopcorn wrote: »

This is being discussed here!

https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057946260/1

There's only so many threads on travellers I can follow. Can we have a sticky for it?

ArrBee

Paddy Cow wrote: »

That guy is a fool. He was going to start an argument. What he would've got was a beating.

Not necessarily.
Who knows how any physical disagreement might have ended up? There's always a bigger fish.

You can't rely solely on the cops to police behavior. Society as a whole needs to chip in and draw the line as what is and isn't acceptable and then go on and moderate itself.
In NZ there is a culture of calling out bad behavior.

Perhaps that's part of the reason for any entitlement culture that may be perceived? Is it because society as a whole allows it by not confronting it openly?

ArrBee wrote: »

Not necessarily.
Who knows how any physical disagreement might have ended up? There's always a bigger fish.

And there's no shortage of hard lads in NZ. The travellers might be lucky they are being sent home, as they were likely to eventually come up against the wrong people.

tuxy

Can anyone confirm if this was a cultural funeral, it looks like it and the surnames would point to it.

I know a retired Garda and have since what happens to them when they try to keep the peace at a wedding (attacked with a machete)
Looks like the funerals are worse.

https://www.thesun.ie/news/3629741/man-cheats-death-blasted-leg-galway-removal-row/

tuxy wrote: »

Can anyone confirm if this was a cultural funeral, it looks like it and the surnames would point to it.

I know a retired Garda and have since what happens to them when they try to keep the peace at a wedding (attacked with a machete)
Looks like the funerals are worse.

https://www.thesun.ie/news/3629741/man-cheats-death-blasted-leg-galway-removal-row/

Yup:

Graveyard search for weapons before Traveller funeral

freshpopcorn wrote: »

Do you under the the concept of this thread or the forums in general?
It's to allow people to discuss various topic and have there say in them.

Yes and there's no need to be patronising, on top of condescending and looking down your nose on someone who you have judged to be less than you (I refer to Ms Cash not me) The general attitude on this thread is one that eminates, she's fair game, get the pitchforks out. Judgmental and lording and wholly inhumane and none of you would do it to the girl face to face, you're a bunch of cowards.

Babooshka wrote: »

Yes and there's no need to be patronising, on top of condescending and looking down your nose on someone who you have judged to be less than you (I refer to Ms Cash not me) The general attitude on this thread is one that eminates, she's fair game, get the pitchforks out. Judgmental and lording and wholly inhumane and none of you would do it to the girl face to face, you're a bunch of cowards.

Any comment on her own behaviour? Damn right someone who works, pays their way, doesn't commit crime, is better than her.

Such dishonest rubbish. What kind of horrible attitude is it to defend her just because of words on the internet.

Ruraldweller56

Babooshka wrote: »

No I am not Margaret Cash, I just don't like seeing anybody booted around social media sites, anyone, for all and sundry to beat with sticks as something to do because they have nothing better to do, and I see how they all pounce like a bunch of baying wild dogs when someone tries to call a halt to it. If it was someone in power they would bring the site down with threats of legal action. But because it's a woman who is on social welfare it's ok, cos like, she's taking our money. (honey)

No you see. This is a societal issue. It's our taxes that pay for these people's preferred lifestyle. We're all well within our rights to be angry about it. Next time a aspiring political candidate comes round my place canvassing this crap will be the first thing I'll be asking them about putting a stop to.

punisher5112

New Zealand and Australia are some countries for laws.

Imagine if we had anything better then the ones we have and were like them how great a country Ireland could be.

The travellers have gotten away with way too much.

Change is needed badly.

freshpopcorn

Babooshka wrote: »

Yes and there's no need to be patronising, on top of condescending and looking down your nose on someone who you have judged to be less than you (I refer to Ms Cash not me) The general attitude on this thread is one that eminates, she's fair game, get the pitchforks out. Judgmental and lording and wholly inhumane and none of you would do it to the girl face to face, you're a bunch of cowards.

I just asked did you know what the thread was about because you came asking for the thread to be deleted because you considered it unfair.
Anybody who has asked her any difficult question such as Niall Boylan she just shouts down and plays the victim card.

xi5yvm0owc1s2b

Babooshka wrote: »

The general attitude on this thread is one that eminates, she's fair game, get the pitchforks out.

Nonsense. Margaret Cash staged photos of her kids sleeping in a Garda station. Then she went to the media, appeared on Claire Byrne, Miriam O'Callaghan, etc., got cosy with Mary Lou, and was later filmed ranting outside the Dail with a megaphone and a buggy, drawing attention to the fact that she had been on the housing list for years and hadn't received her free house yet.

Meanwhile, the country is in the middle of a housing crisis. Many hard-pressed taxpayers can only dream of being able to afford a home and a kid or two of their own, never mind having a 7-a-side football team by age 28. So it's natural for people to ask why they should have to provide for Margaret's needs before their own.

The general attitude on this thread is to treat Margaret Cash as Exhibit A when it comes to entitlement culture run amok -- and she has brought that reputation entirely on her own head with her words and actions.

Ruraldweller56 wrote: »

No you see. This is a societal issue. It's our taxes that pay for these people's preferred lifestyle. We're all well within our rights to be angry about it. Next time a aspiring political candidate comes round my place canvassing this crap will be the first thing I'll be asking them about putting a stop to.

And if s/he doesn't put a stop to it will you paste his name all over this site saying what a bad person he is? No I doubt you will. Being angry about it, I get. Using it as an excuse to take it to the equivalent of a modern day tarring and feathering, anonymously to boot, is not. Hiding behind a facade, lambasting her does not make any of you better people or even help you to feel better, deep down inside there is a bad feeling inside genuinely inherently good people when they metaphorically or otherwise bash others, even if they're correct in how they feel about the persons actions. Taking pleasure in anyone else's wrong doing is just c*ntish, brutish, and this thread is just wrong.

punisher5112

Babooshka wrote: »

And if s/he doesn't put a stop to it will you paste his name all over this site saying what a bad person he is? No I doubt you will. Being angry about it, I get. Using it as an excuse to take it to the equivalent of a modern day tarring and feathering, anonymously to boot, is not. Hiding behind a facade, lambasting her does not make any of you better people or even help you to feel better, deep down inside there is a bad feeling inside genuinely inherently good people when they metaphorically or otherwise bash others, even if they're correct in how they feel about the persons actions. Taking pleasure in anyone else's wrong doing is just c*ntish, brutish, and this thread is just wrong.

I thought you were leaving????

Your agenda isn't working.

Are you the husband of Cash????

Nice to call us c*ntish. You don't seem great yourself - always the case with "be nice!" folks.

Fair game when she keeps posting her bile on social media herself. It's her own behaviour. Why won't you acknowledge this? Why won't you criticise her appalling contempt for others.

Politicians constantly get slated for not waving a magic wand. Much more when they are actually guilty of wrongdoing, like Margaret Cash, who also keeps posting about her wrongdoing on social media.

punisher5112 wrote: »

I thought you were leaving????

Your agenda isn't working.

Are you the husband of Cash????

Far too literate, and lacking threats of violence.

Quango queen might be a possibility though.

Bridget Mushy Viper wrote: »

Nice to call us c*ntish. You don't seem great yourself - always the case with "be nice!" folks.

Fair game when she keeps posting her bile on social media herself. It's her own behaviour. Why won't you acknowledge this? Why won't you criticise her appalling contempt for others.

Politicians constantly get slated for not waving a magic wand. Much more when they are actually guilty of wrongdoing, like Margaret Cash, who also keeps posting about her wrongdoing on social media.

why won't you pick up the stick to beat her like us? Why you call us bad names, we good!! Ha ha. Bye.

Gravelly wrote: »

Far too literate, and lacking threats of violence.

.

You are a very very nasty being. Bye bye now.

KrustyUCC

Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: »

Nonsense. Margaret Cash staged photos of her kids sleeping in a Garda station. Then she went to the media, appeared on Claire Byrne, Miriam O'Callaghan, etc., got cosy with Mary Lou, and was later filmed ranting outside the Dail with a megaphone and a buggy, drawing attention to the fact that she had been on the housing list for years and hadn't received her free house yet.

Meanwhile, the country is in the middle of a housing crisis. Many hard-pressed taxpayers can only dream of being able to afford a home and a kid or two of their own, never mind having a 7-a-side football team by age 28. So it's natural for people to ask why they should have to provide for Margaret's needs before their own.

The general attitude on this thread is to treat Margaret Cash as Exhibit A when it comes to entitlement culture run amok -- and she has brought that reputation entirely on her own head with her words and actions.

Exactly

Nobody would have know who she was only for her publicity stunt

Margaret is keeping herself in the public domain through social media

It is quite ok to discuss her choices. Left school at 12, married at 15, first kid at 17/18, 7 kids by 28 Never worked a day in her life Totally dependent on welfare 39 convictions Yet apparently the government are robbing her by not providing her with her home forever

This thread title is Margaret Cash appears in court over stealing €300 worth of clothes from Pennys

But after avoiding jail at Tallaght Court yesterday, Cash said: “I don’t know what the shoplifting has to do with me being homeless, it is my private life.

"I never said I was a saint or anything, far from it.

“None of this has to do with the homeless crisis.

“I feel like I’m being attacked for highlighting the homeless crisis. It’s all about me shoplifting, they are looking for the bad.

“The clothes were for the kids. I feel like I am being targeted. It is letting the
Government off the hook.”

https://www.thesun.ie/news/3274135/m...-jail-penneys/

So she had to steal €321 worth of clothing to put on the kids backs yet had €600 to spend on a suit?

Just to leave her latest housing comment again

"SO the Council want to take me outta a b+b in Drumcondra and put me in a hub somewer round the south side. I really hate the b+b wer i am because wer travelling from drumcondra to Tallaght and bk every day for school. BUT A HUB like really? Im nearly 12 yrs on the houseing list and 2 yrs homeless. Ive done everyting they asked me i even SHUT UP 4 dem. They told me i wud be HOUSED IN JAN but den they rang yesterday telling me der trying to move me. I was ova the moon untill the lady on the phone told me its a HUB. I WANT A HOME NOT A HUB OR A B+B. Is dis ever gonna end? R we ever gonna get a HOME?"

Babooshka wrote: »

I'm out of here, it smells - very bad. Shame on you all.

Babooshka wrote: »

Yawn, Bye bye,

Babooshka wrote: »

Ha ha. Bye.

Babooshka wrote: »

Bye bye now.

How. Many. More. Times.

elperello wrote: »

Not unable, unwilling.

As a woman who is disgusted at After Hours lately for the misogyny on the thread about the French author, on the thread with all the posts about why DNA testing should be mandatory (not criticism - no matter how harsh - of the evil woman the thread is about though) and the thread about Caitriona Perry, I am at a loss to find misogynistic posts about Margaret Cash on this thread.

qo2cj1dsne8y4k

Babooshka wrote: »

You are a very very nasty being. Bye bye now.

You’re the one dropping the c bomb and personal attacks. Oh the ironing!

Babooshka wrote: »

why won't you pick up the stick to beat her like us? Why you call us bad names, we good!! Ha ha. Bye.

Still no opinion on the odious behaviour. Just defence of her.

Babooshka wrote: »

You are a very very nasty being. Bye bye now.

So are you. Bye? (Question mark as they may be back). And Gravelly is correct - what's nasty or incorrect in what he said? The poor innocent defenceless Margaret and her fella. So gentle. So harmless. They'd wipe the floor with you if you barely got on the wrong side of them.