maccored wrote: » great to see a thread like this making so many feel good about themselves. well done. ye's are obviously all fantastically lovely people (with a penchant for gossiping and whinging about people, on the internet)
Babooshka wrote: » She's only a c&nt....so it's ok for us to be c&ntier.....yes I see your logic there. Enjoy your life c&nting it over everyone.
Babooshka wrote: » No I am not Margaret Cash, I just don't like seeing anybody booted around social media sites, anyone, for all and sundry to beat with sticks as something to do because they have nothing better to do, and I see how they all pounce like a bunch of baying wild dogs when someone tries to call a halt to it. If it was someone in power they would bring the site down with threats of legal action. But because it's a woman who is on social welfare it's ok, cos like, she's taking our money. (honey)
Babooshka wrote: » Ha...tell Denis O'Brien that and he'd laugh in your face, the truth is what you twist it into and the courts are there to protect the rich not the honest or the "low lifes" that you're all so happy to dance all over. I'm out of here, it smells - very bad. Shame on you all.
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » People are commenting on the pictures and statements that Margaret Cash has put into the public sphere, as well as the interviews and speeches that she has given. She put herself in the media with PR stunts designed to get herself a free house. She was the poster girl for several left-wing parties for about 48 hours, before they found out about her and her husband's criminal history and shied away. If everybody in the country now knows her name and reputation, that's hardly the fault of this thread. She has brought it upon herself.
Babooshka wrote: » If casting people, by their name, in a bad light for their entire life isn't defamatory then I don't know what is.
Babooshka wrote: » You've got a mouth like one instead. Yawn, Bye bye, to you on high, enjoy it up there from the tip of your nose down your keyboard, it's probably the only place you get to lord it over anyone. I'd rather be stuck in a lift with Margaret than any of you lot.
Gravelly wrote: »
Jasiah Hot Talker wrote: » I’ve always wanted a vagina like a yawning hippo. ?
Babooshka wrote: » Shame on you all.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » the truth is a defence to defamation.
Babooshka wrote: » Can someone with some sense please delete this thread, just why is a thread with this woman's name on it allowed to remain here day in day out, totally unfair and surely not within the laws of defamation.
Babooshka wrote: » So you're jealous of her....honey? Then just do the same if you think it's so easy and comfortable a lifestyle, after all, it's a free country, no one stopped her, so they won't stop you, honey. You sound like an idiot with your honeys, honey.
ShaneC93 wrote: » Margaret, is that you? For something to be defamation it has to be making knowingly false claims against someone. I haven't seem anyone doing that here.
Babooshka wrote: » If casting people, by their name, in a bad light for their entire life isn't defamatory then I don't know what is. Would a thread about Denis O'Brien be allowed here like this?
elperello wrote: » Correct and right. I'm not dredging up examples of others filth and repeating it.
retro:electro wrote: » I’m gonna call bs on most of her spelling errors. Some of them seem so deliberately done. I’ve seen the score before. Pretend they can’t read to avoid letters summonsing them to court but have no problem scrolling through the Sky channels on their HD box informing you of what’s on the box later
Gravelly wrote: » Riiiiiiight
Jasiah Hot Talker wrote: » News flash honey, pointing out stealing is wrong, having kids you can’t afford is irresponsible and the only time someone should expect a forever house is when they buy one isn’t mysogynstic. It’s common sense. Margaret and her foghorn mouth made herself the poster child for the perpetually entitled, she made outlandish claims that the state, ie, us, the people, are ROBBING her and aren’t working hard enough to supply her with even more of her lifestyle. Bear in mind she has never earned one euro of her own money. Is it misogynistic of her, to deny women like me the chance to have a large family? I mean if it didn’t cost us all so much paying for her and everyone like her, then the rest of us could afford more than one or two kids.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » there has been nothing defamatory.
elperello wrote: » Not unable, unwilling.
elperello wrote: » I can't be responsible for educating people on here. If anyone who has been following this thread can't see misogyny directed against M Cash nothing I can post will convince them.
Gravelly wrote: » Unless of course you posted an actual example of it, which you seem unable to do.
