Jay_mate_jay wrote: » I feel like you'd have to in some strange way.. Like could the LL could consider it a breach of contract?
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » I feel like you'd have to in some strange way.. Like could the LL could consider it a breach of contrsct?
SteM wrote: » No because he's my child and not a dog. Don't get me wrong, I love my dog but if I couldn't find a suitable place to stay because of him then I would consider giving him up. Comparing the love I have for my child to a dog is bonkers imo.
Hoboo wrote: » There is nothing to compare, love is love, end of Very responsible ownership right there. Be honest, you don't love your dog, you've no idea what love for an animal is if youd give them up. I'd sooner sleep in the park with my dog than give her up.
Hoboo wrote: » . I'd sooner sleep in the park with my dog than give her up.
Dav010 wrote: » If you have a family and the dog was impacting your ability to put a roof over their head, you might have to pause for thought about your priorities.
Hoboo wrote: » Then don't get a dog. It's not a disposable commodity to bin as you see fit. It's part of the family.
ExoPolitic wrote: » Facts don't care about feelings, cold but true.
Dav010 wrote: » I understand, but if most LLs today will not accept pets, you are reducing your chances of getting a rental property. It could very well come down to a hard choice depending on how important it is to get a place to rent.
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » Im genuinely astounded by the negativity surrounding pets and children renting, how are any family's meant to stand a chsnce? Having moved from England where this is not even an option as long as you can prove you can pay your way and that you won't trash the gaff, I begin to see where the issues lie in the rental crisis. We are lucky at the moment that we are living with family so we can bide our time a little but I'm shocked at so much of a negative response, even more so at the people who thinks it's okay to just dispose of a dog that's been a member of the family longer than my child has! Therefore love has no bounds for both my child and dog
Dav010 wrote: » To be fair, I doubt there are many LLs who don’t accept kids, dogs are a different matter. You love your dog, but to a LL a property is an asset and the risks of damage are higher with a dog. Also, if a dog (not yours) did thousands of euro worth of damage, the chance of a LL getting that from the dog owner are likely to be zero. Unfortunately, their house, their rules. With high demand an owner knows they can reject pet owners.
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » Completely get that, maybe it is the approach that its not mentioned until a face to face meeting with the LL and we then discuss the pet and contingencies in place to protect their property. Maybe even suggesting to place a legal agreement to repair any significant damage caused by pet.
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » Im genuinely astounded by the negativity surrounding pets and children renting, how are any family's meant to stand a chsnce? Having moved from England where this is not even an issue as long as you can prove you can pay your way and that you won't trash the gaff, I begin to see where the issues lie in the rental crisis. We are lucky at the moment that we are living with family so we can bide our time a little but I'm shocked at so much of a negative response, even more so at the people who thinks it's okay to just dispose of a dog that's been a member of the family longer than my child has! Therefore love has no bounds for both my child and dog
Dav010 wrote: » The LL may have to go to court to enforce that legal agreement if the tenant refuses to pay. That would not appeal to many LLs.
Deleted User wrote: » It really is crazy. Its very common to have a dog or a cat as a pet. It wouldn't be half as common if they really destroyed your house. Huge cost, Short term leases, not allowed to have a pet... and people wonder why we're obsessed with home ownership
The Enbalmer wrote: » I rented to people with dogs twice. Never again. it was the same situation on both occasions. The smell of the dog was pronounced and obvious the minute you opened the door. There was hair all over the carpeted areas even though I was told the dogs "don't shed". from what the neighbours told me the dogs were left in the back garden from 8 am til 6pm yapping and howling constantly. The grass was worn in patches in the garden and there was ****e everywhere..disgusting. The smell took days to get out of the house when they had left and the feckin hairs were a nightmare to hoover up from all the places they had managed to work themselves into. I would never rent to anybody with a dog again and my own personal opinion is this: Dogs are social animals and don't like being kept by themselves for long periods of time and nor should they be kept in people's houses or kept out the back garden for weeks on end. Dogs are absolutely not suitable pets for urban living.
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » I suppose the anti side of that is that my missus hates the dog hairs on the carpet so nearly follows the dog around with the vacuum haha! I can see your point, its really irritating that one or two irresponsible owners have ruined your perception
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » If the tenant has stipulated this, then there would be no case. This should give the LL confidence in the tenant?
Deleted User wrote: » Hi OP I asked the question yesterday: what kind of a dog is it? Big or small? Used to spending time out in the garden or not? Is he walked daily or left alone by himself? Also would you not consider Drogheda, Laytown, Bettystown, Julianstown, Gormanston, all within 20 mins of Swords. I am from Swords originally and live in Drogheda now and there is no comparison. Its lovely up this way and nicer for dogs too! if you give a bit more information the posters might actually give more constructive comments - less negativity.;)
Dav010 wrote: » Unfortunately not. What happens if the tenant leaves and refuses/can’t afford to pay? LL has to go to a solicitor/court.
airportgirl83 wrote: » It's a very cruel thing to say imo You wouldn't think of giving your child away just because you can't find a new apt. I am being very realistic, I know it's not going to be easy to find a place with a dog but it is possible (as I mentioned two of my friends have dogs and are renting). Most people here are so negative, its so sad. Landlords out there are charging huge amounts in rent for badly furnished, disgusting, mouldy, cold apartments, cop on - it is just a dog! Deposit should cover any damages (increase it if you are worried). Like someone said before children could do more damage to your property than a dog. Anyone who tells him to give away his pet to a kennel has no heart. Hope someone will treat you like that one day - dispose, just because you are not convinient anymore.
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » Sorry I mustn't have seen, I do apologise! He is a rough collie kind of average collie size.. He is taken on at least hour long walks a day and has a kennel outside but currently has the choice to be outside or inside as my partber or me are always home Unfortunately I couldn't as we don't drive and work in swords/santry
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » Im genuinely astounded by the negativity surrounding pets and children renting, how are any family's meant to stand a chsnce?
Jay_mate_jay wrote: » I was wondering what tips or if anyone had any recommendations they could lend please We are a very respectable family with good jobs and a very well behaved dog trying to move into a rental home in the Swords area in Dublin but nothing seems to be aligning. Would anyone be able to help please!