nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gangland Shootings [Mod Note in Post #1]

JamBur

Nobody cares about scum killing scum, let them eradicate each other

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

richiepurgas

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

A combination torch and stun gun - which is illegal to own and possess in the UK - were recovered following a search.

Can't see any lengthy sentence if that's all they have on him. Maybe the property searches might throw up more.

Gadgetman496

richiepurgas wrote: »

Can't see any lengthy sentence if that's all they have on him. Maybe the property searches might throw up more.

I think that was after the property search.

NCA officers and gardaí investigating organised crime along with officers from Staffordshire police force carried out a number of searches following the arrest.

r93kaey5p2izun

Is Bomber any relation to Hatchet/Paul/Jamie does anyone know?

White lighting

Major Great Cellist wrote: »

Is Bomber any relation to Hatchet/Paul/Jamie does anyone know?

Cousin of Hatchet and Paul i think.

CZ 453

Is Ballymun a blackout from last night? There seems to be only 2 lines given to it by the Mirror and the rest is tweets from locals.

ASOT

CZ 453 wrote: »

Is Ballymun a blackout from last night? There seems to be only 2 lines given to it by the Mirror and the rest is tweets from locals.

Doesn't seem to be anything in the media but It was connected to the Sheridan killing from back in October.

Gadgetman496

CZ 453 wrote: »

Is Ballymun a blackout from last night? There seems to be only 2 lines given to it by the Mirror and the rest is tweets from locals.

The Mirror article has been removed, maybe it was fake news?

ASOT

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

The Mirror article has been removed, maybe it was fake news?

It wasn't fake news.

Gadgetman496

ASOT wrote: »

It wasn't fake news.

Deemed to be insignificant then?

ASOT

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

Deemed to be insignificant then?

Yeah, it's nothing to do with any of the big feuds or even the Ballymun fueds. Not life threatening either so id imagine nobody cares. He's a clown anyway. The family are scumbags.

septictank

Quick search on Google says they are a fine bunch of lads alright lol.

realdanbreen

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

A combination torch and stun gun - which is illegal to own and possess in the UK - were recovered following a search.

I heard Paul Reynolds on radio saying it carries a Minimum sentence of 5 years, Surely he meant Maximum?

Gadgetman496

realdanbreen wrote: »

I heard Paul Reynolds on radio saying it carries a Minimum sentence of 5 years, Surely he meant Maximum?

In the UK Tasers are considered "prohibited weapons" under the Firearms Act 1968 and possession is an offence. The maximum sentence for possession is ten years in prison and an unlimited fine. There is a minimum sentence of 5 years imprisonment if the taser is disguised as another object such as a torch or a mobile phone.

6541

Something doesn't smell right here. So they arrested them in the Airport and only charged with possession.
Also the picture of the Gardai and the UK cops going into search his house.
Something is not as it seems here.

hatrickpatrick

6541 wrote: »

Something doesn't smell right here. So they arrested them in the Airport and only charged with possession.
Also the picture of the Gardai and the UK cops going into search his house.
Something is not as it seems here.

Perhaps they're building a conspiracy case and don't want to say more until they've netted others. I remember this was a big thing with some international crime cases a few years ago where they'd arrest people on seemingly small charges and then eventually drop a massive indictment naming everyone previously arrested and caught as co-conspirators in a huge operation. Probably easier to catch people out that way.

So for instance, they arrest him, announce that it's on this single charge, and then closely monitor other suspects to see how they react - see if they can be caught in the destruction of evidence or anything like that.

Ash.J.Williams

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/padraig_reilly/status/1084442130444095490

realdanbreen wrote: »

I heard Paul Reynolds on radio saying it carries a Minimum sentence of 5 years, Surely he meant Maximum?

Up to ten years apparently

ohnonotgmail

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

Up to ten years apparently

up to 10 years but with a minimum of 5 except in exceptional circumstances. I cant imagine there are much in the way of exceptional circumstances in this case.

Gadgetman496

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

up to 10 years but with a minimum of 5 except in exceptional circumstances. I cant imagine there are much in the way of exceptional circumstances in this case.

A minimum of five if the stun gun was disguised as another object such as a torch or a mobile phone. In other words, if you try to conceal it's identity you get at least 5 years whereas unconcealed could get you anything from 0-10.

ohnonotgmail

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

A minimum of five if the stun gun was disguised as another object such as a torch or a mobile phone. In other words, if you try to conceal it's identity you get at least 5 years whereas unconcealed could get you anything from 0-10.

It seems that it was

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/senior-kinahan-cartel-suspect-due-before-court-in-england-this-morning-on-stungun-charge-37707639.html

Thomas 'Bomber' Kavanagh (51) is due at North Staffordshire Magistrates court after a combination torch and stun gun was discovered during a search targeting his trafficking network in Britain.

Gadgetman496

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

It seems that it was

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/senior-kinahan-cartel-suspect-due-before-court-in-england-this-morning-on-stungun-charge-37707639.html

Well then, if the charge sticks he'll have to get a minimum of 5

Gadgetman496

Apparently he was initially granted bail but then this!

https://twitter.com/Healyhack/status/1084794271893458947

Gadgetman496

https://twitter.com/NI_ALLO/status/1084200151844118530

Bubblegummers

Gadgetman496 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/NI_ALLO/status/1084200151844118530

Rocker?

Rows Grower

I'm gonna guess that the stun gun is only a holding charge and there are a lot more serious charges in the pipeline for this chap.

pablo128

Rows Grower wrote: »

I'm gonna guess that the stun gun is only a holding charge and there are a lot more serious charges in the pipeline for this chap.

The fact that he was getting bail for a measly stun gun and the prosecution objected... they want him out of the way for a bit so they can land something big on him.

Jeff2

Just the fact they kept him on remand will put it up to others.

realdanbreen

Looks like they are taking the same approach that the guards did in Limerick to tackle the Dundons & Coloppys. Put them away for a few years on smallish stuff like threatening to kill etc and while they are away then work on the ones lower down the pecking order and maybe entice them to give evidence against the bigger boys.

hatrickpatrick

Haven't heard anything about any firebomb attacks in Dublin recently, can anyone shed more light on that claim?

EDIT: Wow. https://www.herald.ie/news/firebomb-attack-terror-for-two-hutch-women-in-kinahan-gang-intimidation-37700963.html

Surprised this wasn't a bigger headline.

6541

I really can't figure what that whole episode was about.
That chap got bail

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/thomas-kavanagh-gets-bail-on-stun-gun-charge-37717000.html

Why would they arrest such a major figure on such small charges. Something does not add up here.

Gadgetman496

The pink-coloured stun-gun was discovered on top of a kitchen cupboard, the previous hearing was told.

He'll probably claim it was the wife's for protection in the home while he was away on business... Pink!