Pablo Escobar wrote: » Here's a new article on the 2040 plan for Cork. A price tag of €3.1bn is quoted.https://www.eveningecho.ie/corknews/Corks-new-transport-plan-will-cost-31-billion-to-implement-c86801a9-6f84-47a6-8143-fabbb8361340-ds
cgcsb wrote: » price tag seems high, so I'm guessing that Cork NRR is included in that.
Augeo wrote: I'm a person from cork, tourist to X,y,z etc etc too BTW along with hundreds of thousands others too....so don't be thinking you've a superior appreciation on transport logistics to the rest of us.
Augeo wrote: It's not massively important at all....it's a largely insignificant factor to the vast majority
opus wrote: » Some bit of good news about the site on Sullivan's Quay although BAM seem pretty good at avoiding penalties.Hotel site owners in Cork given 12 weeks to deal with rubble
snotboogie wrote: » Rubble to be used for infill or something on the Events Centre site. Still no word on the planning from BAM...
snotboogie wrote: » Another South Mall hotel application:New plans lodged for 58-bed hotel on South Mall Decision due on the 11th of March
snotboogie wrote: » Classic NIMBYism from our Lord Mayor:Student accommodation plan gives 'two fingers' to locals
the beer revolu wrote: » It's two fingers to the local property owners who rent substandard 3 bedroom houses to 8 students for astronomical rent!
whisky_galore wrote: » Wonder what students will pay for this new place? Student accom is being fired up all over in lieu of normal housing as there's a financial incentive??
EdgeCase wrote: » To be honest that kind of commentary makes Cork seem like a city that doesn't even want its very high profile university. UCC is a massive asset to this city both economically and culturally. There's a dire need for purpose built student accommodation. It will both help reduce the housing crisis by taking students out of the market and will also improve issues around antisocial behaviour in badly maintained, totally inappropriate housing that should be in use as permanent homes.
fash wrote: » Rents tend to be very high- however quality and location is good and rental is designed around academic year. Benefits for developer is the density / number of beds per sq.m. of site is very high compared to building houses or apartments.
marno21 wrote: » Any word on when the Docklands LAP is to be published? So much waiting on both it and the CMATS Oh and CMATS is now down for Q1 2019https://www.eveningecho.ie/corknews/Ditching-private-car-commutes-essential-to-building-a-sustainable-Cork-city-2ea55506-c5b6-4529-ab98-5ad7311ee1b9-ds
marno21 wrote: » Influx of students. LOL The influx of students in that area started in 1845.
Markcheese wrote: » If there's a decent public transport plan, should city centre appartments still all need parking places? ... Its a serious extra cost, (although I realise a plan isn't the same as actually providing public transport..
snotboogie wrote: » Cork bike share scheme gears up to expand
namloc1980 wrote: » Good news but not including CIT or Douglas in the expanded bike scheme is a bit of a mad one.
mire wrote: » I just read that article about the cork bike scheme. To be honest its depressing and it says quite a lot about official attitudes to these kind of issues. All it reveals is that an expansion is being considered. This quotation "It is likely that the operating costs associated with the expanded scheme will require additional sources of revenue, in order to maintain an attractive pricing structure for users of the bike scheme." Says it all. In translation, we are not really prepared or all that interested in public transport. They don't understand either the necessity or the value of investing in non car transport modes.