SlickRic wrote: » 48 from 5 with AWB first sub. Couldn't have reasonably asked for better.
naughtb4 wrote: » machiavellianme wrote: » naughtb4 wrote: » Would disagree, some good analysis on another site this week that showed Palace keepers at 4 PPG for the year. Also the .6 difference of moving from Fab can be used elsewhere. Having two playing keepers is pain as you incariably get it wrong That's like saying that having 13 playing outfield players is a pain because you inevitably get it wrong or having a captain is a pain because you can get that wrong. Truth of the matter is, having options is generally good in case your keeper gets injured or a sudden bout of flu or is about to get destroyed by City/Spurs/Liverpool etc. and suddenly you've got zilch. It's often in those games where they get destroyed they get a points haul though. I just think the points difference between non premium keepers at the end is negligible. We all hate benching points (looking at you AWB). It's mostly the .6 savings that swung it for me, I think of the next 10 weeks, I'd be playing Fab two at most
machiavellianme wrote: » naughtb4 wrote: » Would disagree, some good analysis on another site this week that showed Palace keepers at 4 PPG for the year. Also the .6 difference of moving from Fab can be used elsewhere. Having two playing keepers is pain as you incariably get it wrong That's like saying that having 13 playing outfield players is a pain because you inevitably get it wrong or having a captain is a pain because you can get that wrong. Truth of the matter is, having options is generally good in case your keeper gets injured or a sudden bout of flu or is about to get destroyed by City/Spurs/Liverpool etc. and suddenly you've got zilch.
naughtb4 wrote: » Would disagree, some good analysis on another site this week that showed Palace keepers at 4 PPG for the year. Also the .6 difference of moving from Fab can be used elsewhere. Having two playing keepers is pain as you incariably get it wrong
GetWithIt wrote: » There just isn't the premium attacking value in Alonso anymore. Sad times.
SlickRic wrote: » If Hazard blanks I'll genuinely start to believe that Busts has a hex on him.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Newcastle have pushed way up come on counter hazzard goal
naughtb4 wrote: » How do you do it!! I look at your team every week and think it looks similar to mine and every week u crush me in points ! Fair play, hope the good scores keep coming
Pete_Cavan wrote: » I held onto Hazard for this game but will have to cut him loose now. It's as much Sarri I'm sick of as Hazard. He seems more interested in bringing CMs with little attacking threat into the club than addressing the problems they have. I don't see what signing Higuen will achieve, he will have little to work with and if anything will probably restrict Hazards attacking chances. While Chelsea lack goals, a one dimensional striker isn't going to change much, they need more creativity behind that. I know he scored but Willian offers little, they should be taking Barca's hand off to get him out the door.
SlickRic wrote: » naughtb4 wrote: » How do you do it!! I look at your team every week and think it looks similar to mine and every week u crush me in points ! Fair play, hope the good scores keep coming 1. A good start. I'm better conservative than risk taking. 2. Luck 3. An unerring faith in Salah
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/2166e486d2270e36003cd1b3e3519b24.svg)
