Pastor Brent wrote: » It's a pity that service to Charles de Gaulle with airFrance that came about 10 years ago only lasted a short time.
Cookiemunster wrote: » I have to disagree with you mdmix. My parents in their late 60s check the Ryanair and Aer Lingus sites for flights from Shannon before deciding if they need to go elsewhere. If they in their in their late 60s, not being that text savvy, can tell that you don't need to default to DUB, then theres no excuse for anyone not being able to do the same.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Kuwaiti Airlines last flight transitting through Shannon is currently on the ground. The service is finished as of today.
hobie14 wrote: » Are you serious? .......
marno21 wrote: » https://twitter.com/KuwaitAirways/status/1083380949075808256 KWI-JFK direct on the B77W from tomorrow.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Bad news for a lot of staff.
Shn99 wrote: » Will there be lay-offs?
RocketRaccoon wrote: » I can't imagine some companies will be able to keep on the same amount of staff they currently have. It was a fairly huge operation in comparison to every other flight in the airport.
Poxyshamrock wrote: » Why? What did it require?
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Ground handling, security, wheelchairs, cargo. I would guess 40+ staff involved.
Poxyshamrock wrote: » Did passengers enter the terminal to use pre clearance facilities?
JCX BXC wrote: » Ryanair new route: Shannon-Frankfurt: 1x weekly, from May. Unsure of days/timings. It's not a wild shot in the dark to say this is to try remove Lufthansa. I think this is a good new example of why Shannon struggles to get European routes. Ryanair don't want to run them, but they're not keen on allowing others to do it either.
Masala wrote: » Jeez... not smart negotiations on SNNs part. Did they not learn their lesson from the past. They should be concentrating on building their relationship with Lufthansa as a priority rather than annoying them.
JCX BXC wrote: » What can Shannon actually do?
Masala wrote: » Can they not say.... thanks but no thanks? Better have 1 flight full and a happy operator rather than 2 flights half full and 2 unhappy operators. If the latter.... it won't be long before you have 0 operators.
Masala wrote: » SNN could still have the upper hand depending on the flight times requested. They could play the 'ramp congestion' card and suggest alternative arrival/ departure times and if not feasible from FRA... then that could be the end of that!! To me titblooks like an anti- Lufthansa move and whilst it might be good for the short break market... it will be a case of out on RY and back on LF. Or visaversa.
highlydebased wrote: » Where did you see this? They've been posting all over Instagram/Twitter about their flight to Frankfurt and saying it's with Ryanair, but I think that's a schoolboy error...
JCX BXC wrote: » That's not what my source was, but perhaps it was confusion. Not the first time that Shannon Airport have messed up social media.