lsjmhar wrote: » Crypto is dying. Not one project has delivered a usable project so any investments in this area is the preserve of lunatics. Complete linux scheme. That is why the price is down +80%. Nobody investing in imaginary money. Also, but $Vites, the coin for all future freelance workers!!!
JJJJNR wrote: Do you even linux bro.
lsjmhar wrote: » Ponzi scheme
el diablo wrote: Educate yourself kiddo. Start with learning the definition of "Ponzi scheme".
Grumpypants wrote: » Im talking about post 2023 we wont see dub 100 again. We might see 60 before Jan is out.
lsjmhar wrote: » This is a complete ponzi scheme. All the people that put money in in 2017 caused a massive run. That money was all pulled out by those who profited. There are no new people to put money in, therefore the prices have collapsed +80%. A monkey can see this!!
lsjmhar wrote: » This is a complete ponzi scheme. All the people that put money in in 2017 caused a massive run. That money was all pulled out by those who profited. There are no new people to put money in, therefore the prices have collapsed +80%. A monkey can see this!! No new suckers to keep the charade going. I followed a few of these ICO companies on medium and they have managed to produce nothing. They have no idea what they are doing but are sitting on $50m for the next 10 years pretending they are going in the right direction.
Grumpypants wrote: » lsjmhar wrote: » This is a complete ponzi scheme. All the people that put money in in 2017 caused a massive run. That money was all pulled out by those who profited. There are no new people to put money in, therefore the prices have collapsed +80%. A monkey can see this!! No new suckers to keep the charade going. I followed a few of these ICO companies on medium and they have managed to produce nothing. They have no idea what they are doing but are sitting on $50m for the next 10 years pretending they are going in the right direction. If you think you are the first "hilarious" informed poster with the same ponzi dribble you aren't. Plenty have shown up, shown their ignorance on the subject and vanished off down another fruitless troll path after a day or two.
The Enbalmer wrote: » You shrewd investor types..so rational and articulate.
makeorbrake wrote: » The Enbalmer wrote: » You shrewd investor types..so rational and articulate. So incredibly insightful. We've all learned from you imparting your knowledge. What a happy accident that was you turning up here rather than After Hours.
The Enbalmer wrote: » What's the "we" business? Either you're attempting to Hide In The Crowd or you're hearing voices again. Tell me..are the voices telling you to HODL? ��
cnocbui wrote: » I agree with him wholeheartedly, so he speaks for me also with the minimum number for a 'we' now being firmly established.
The Enbalmer wrote: » What's the "we" business?
Grumpypants wrote: » It has been tracking pretty close to its historical charting. It predicted this false dawn, and another crash from now to the end of Jan. Even below the previous low. But that is then the final bottom and it is a slow burn to 2023 and 300K+ Either way I sold out 40% of my holding at around €120 for ETH and will hopefully buy back in. Anything under €100 will be nice. We will never see sub 100 again.
Pussyhands wrote: » If you're so confident in your belief that BTC is going to 300k, why worry about the difference between 120 and 100 for ETH?
Grumpypants wrote: » Sell 5 at 120 and buy them back at 100 and you can get an extra 1 ETH. It Increases the overall total number of ETH without investing additional funds. Even if ETH only gets back to 1k, that 1 ETH is a free 1k for pressing a few buttons. But mainly I like messing about in the trading pond with a relatively small amount. Majority of my investing is long term, this is just play time. I did the same when i felt the stock market had over run. Sold my shares when they were $136 each and bought back a few months later at $71. Same money invested but almost double the number of shares. They have just passed $92 on the way back up now.
grindle wrote: » This may be hard for you to follow, but you gave a snarky response to Grumpypants. makeorbrake then replied to you. Those two posters agreeing with eachother is sufficient to be considered a "we". Just like your post is considered to be a "shít". What's an "Enbalmer" by the way? I'd thought you were being facetious when you brought up the articulate nature of crypto investors but I guess not if you've been pronouncing Embalm as Enbalm. You'd get more help on a linguistics forum to be honest, as much as we'd like to be of help this forum is really meant for cryptocurrency chat.
The Enbalmer wrote: » Hell hath no fury like a victim of a pyramid scheme! :rolleyes: Keep on HODLing though..your rocket to the moon is due any minute..we (by which i mean anybody who hasn't wasted money on cryptocurrency) don't understand the tech..this time it's different and you're all "long-term" investors. I remember similar nonsense from victims of the Telecom Eireann scam...when they realised they had been suckered (not that they'd admit it) they turned nasty.
Grumpypants wrote: » Boy i hate being a sucker!!
Grumpypants wrote: » I "wasted" €1500 crypto in Jan 2017. Took out 5k in cash. Spent 3k on a holiday for the family Paid off my car loan Bought a PS4 pro, xbox one X, nintendo switch, 4k sony bravia, oculus rift and a bunch of games. Paid the mortgage and bills for 9 months while the missus was on maternity leave. And i still have about 6k wasting away in a fake money ponzi scheme after the 90% crash. Boy i hate being a sucker!!
