snotboogie wrote: » Cork is actually a bit lower; 2.3m 2017, projected to be 2.4m 2018 and they have themselves speculated 2.6m for 2019. Whether that 2.6m can be achieved remains to be seen.
turbbo wrote: » Shocked to know the numbers. Cork is way ahead I'm guessing because Dublin is seen as less of an option?
Cookiemunster wrote: » Selective quotation of of context there twisting what I said. That's not very nice. And nothing you've just said there contradicts what I said. SNN will never take passengers form the Dublin region out of DUB as you have claimed it could. However if SNN had more routes more local people would use the SNN rather than DUB. It's not that complicated and definitely isn't me talking out of both side of my mouth. Do try to keep up.
jasper100 wrote: » You are talking out of both sides of your mouth here. One minute you are telling us the vast majority of people use the cheapest and closest airport and next minute you are telling us Shannon is only attractive if it has the routes to match Dublin.
Cookiemunster wrote: » Can SNN increase it routes? Probably yes. Can SNN compete with DUB? Not in a million years. Lads ye a living in dream land if you think that SNN will ever draw large numbers of passengers out of DUB. It's not as simple as ye think it is. The airlines only want to be in DUB, where they're drawing passengers, not only from the Midwest, but from Cork and Belfast (which has two international airports) too. SNN is never going to be more than a small regional airport (and there's nothing wrong with that).
Cookiemunster wrote: » But the vast majority people will choose the cheapest flights from the nearest airport.
Cookiemunster wrote: » T It's only attractive if SNN has the routes to compete with DUB. That's never going to happen.
Cookiemunster wrote: » It's only attractive if SNN has the routes to compete with DUB. That's never going to happen.
JCX BXC wrote: » The new motorway, cutting what, 4 minutes off the previous drive to Galway?
Deagol wrote: » I was happy just reading this thread until I read this nonsense. It's being facetious to suggest that the motorway hasn't significantly improved access to the airport. Tuam to Shannon is roughly 40 minutes faster. I've measured it myself once and google maps with traffic is agreeing closely with that number NOW. If you take it that in fact if I used the old road previously to the motorway being built then the traffic would have been even worse. If time from Tuam is faster then it goes without saying that other area's in the hinterland of Galway have comparable improved times with obvious adjustments depending on how far east or west of the motorway / old N18 they are. I've checked Inverrin for instance also, and google maps is saying the motorway is 30 minutes faster. I could go on.
Cookiemunster wrote: » The motorway is 10Km longer than using the old N18. It's underused by locals as it's too far away from Galway. Google maps actually says taking the motorway takes slightly longer than taking the old N18.
turbbo wrote: » WTF? On a busy summer day stuck behind tractors from Gort to Clarinbridge could add 40 mins to your journey easy. You haven't a notion if you think it only cuts 4 mins from Galway to Shannon. I'd say on average it cuts 20 mins a journey and makes for a far safer and comfortable drive.
jasper100 wrote: » You didnt, you included all sorts of stuff like corporate jets, ba, kuwait, freight. We are obviously discussing regular scheduled flights where people actually leave the airport on arrival.
jasper100 wrote: » Shannon would cover Galway city in its catchment area as well at this stage, given the new motorway.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » On a busy summer day, you will have between 25-30 commercial passenger flights. I can get the exact figures if someone wants to throw a date at me. Thursdays and Saturdays in July being the busiest days.
jasper100 wrote: » I never said parking was free, but competitive parking rates and shorter transit times from car parking space to airline gate will make shannon more attractive to people as far away as portlaoise, athlone etc. I am not sure how important facilities after the gate are, I doubt anybody chooses an airport based on what extra shops they might have.
jasper100 wrote: » Of course they do but the discussion is about growing scheduled flights which the local population can avail of.
Shn99 wrote: » They all bring in money to the airport, dont they?
Cookiemunster wrote: » The M50 isn't gridlocked 24/7 and parking is Shannon isn't free. And while the queues are short the facilities after security are non existent compared to DUB. Quite simply the vast majority of people living within 50km of DUB will not ever travel to SNN. And SNN will never have the route choices to attract them anyway.
Sunny Gentle Koala wrote: » You can't count the US military flights, nor the flights that do laps such as the Lufthansa one that did about 50 today
JCX BXC wrote: » Where in the name of God did you pull this figure out of? It's very inaccurate. In September (I chose September as it's neither the peak nor the trough) there was 2,066 movements, working out at nearly 69 a day or 34.5 in/out.
jasper100 wrote: » Why not? People from Limerick go to Dublin for flights. Yes I know that's partly because there are very few connections from Shannon, but if I was living in Kildare then I'd have to factor in the potential gridlock on the M50, parking costs and time to get from long term car parks to Dublin airport, queues getting throught security etc. Its an extra 130km to Shannon, so an extra hour. By having parking closer to the terminal, having cheaper costs, shorter security times, shorter walking times to gate etc. people won't be long biting into that extra hour. I am not saying it should happen overnight, but it is a bit of a chicken and egg situation.