JCX BXC wrote: » The new motorway, cutting what, 4 minutes off the previous drive to Galway?
turbbo wrote: » WTF? On a busy summer day stuck behind tractors from Gort to Clarinbridge could add 40 mins to your journey easy. You haven't a notion if you think it only cuts 4 mins from Galway to Shannon. I'd say on average it cuts 20 mins a journey and makes for a far safer and comfortable drive.
Cookiemunster wrote: » The motorway is 10Km longer than using the old N18. It's underused by locals as it's too far away from Galway. Google maps actually says taking the motorway takes slightly longer than taking the old N18.
Deagol wrote: » I was happy just reading this thread until I read this nonsense. It's being facetious to suggest that the motorway hasn't significantly improved access to the airport. Tuam to Shannon is roughly 40 minutes faster. I've measured it myself once and google maps with traffic is agreeing closely with that number NOW. If you take it that in fact if I used the old road previously to the motorway being built then the traffic would have been even worse. If time from Tuam is faster then it goes without saying that other area's in the hinterland of Galway have comparable improved times with obvious adjustments depending on how far east or west of the motorway / old N18 they are. I've checked Inverrin for instance also, and google maps is saying the motorway is 30 minutes faster. I could go on.
Cookiemunster wrote: » It's only attractive if SNN has the routes to compete with DUB. That's never going to happen.
Cookiemunster wrote: » But the vast majority people will choose the cheapest flights from the nearest airport.
Cookiemunster wrote: » T It's only attractive if SNN has the routes to compete with DUB. That's never going to happen.
Cookiemunster wrote: » Can SNN increase it routes? Probably yes. Can SNN compete with DUB? Not in a million years. Lads ye a living in dream land if you think that SNN will ever draw large numbers of passengers out of DUB. It's not as simple as ye think it is. The airlines only want to be in DUB, where they're drawing passengers, not only from the Midwest, but from Cork and Belfast (which has two international airports) too. SNN is never going to be more than a small regional airport (and there's nothing wrong with that).
jasper100 wrote: » You are talking out of both sides of your mouth here. One minute you are telling us the vast majority of people use the cheapest and closest airport and next minute you are telling us Shannon is only attractive if it has the routes to match Dublin.
Cookiemunster wrote: » Selective quotation of of context there twisting what I said. That's not very nice. And nothing you've just said there contradicts what I said. SNN will never take passengers form the Dublin region out of DUB as you have claimed it could. However if SNN had more routes more local people would use the SNN rather than DUB. It's not that complicated and definitely isn't me talking out of both side of my mouth. Do try to keep up.
turbbo wrote: » Shocked to know the numbers. Cork is way ahead I'm guessing because Dublin is seen as less of an option?
snotboogie wrote: » Cork is actually a bit lower; 2.3m 2017, projected to be 2.4m 2018 and they have themselves speculated 2.6m for 2019. Whether that 2.6m can be achieved remains to be seen.
mdmix wrote: » Cork people are notoriously cork centric. One of the teams I work with flys to Boston twice a year, with 4 flying from Shannon. The one cork guy insists he must fly from cork usually via Heathrow. It causes hassle for everyone. While this is obviously the exception rather than the rule for most cork people, there are a sizable number of corkonians like this. I don’t think people of the west or Midwest have that kind of affinity with our airport. I also do feel the DAA may be a bit bitter about the whole Shannon separation and are giving cork airport more attention than they would have in the past. Corks success is a big “I told you so” to Shannon.
mdmix wrote: » if Shannon management were aware they could apply pressure to the relevant airlines. I don’t think they have people with the right skills.
http://www.clare.fm/news/shannon-airport-soars-new-heights-prestigious-award-nomination/ For the sixth year in a row, the Midwest Facility has been shortlisted for the airline industry’s most coveted World Routes Marketing Award. The awards celebrate airports for their outstanding achievements in route development marketing and benefits to the industry
Balf wrote: » The issue of Shannon's marketing has been mentioned a few times. How does this compare to this?Is it possible that their marketing expertise is no worse than most, and maybe better than many? They seem to be active in all the right things - developing that connection to the region by (just for example) unveiling statues commemorating both the Munster team and Brendan O'Regan. Are there structural issues they just can't overcome? Are expectations excessive? After all, passenger numbers are increasing. Just more slowly than people would like.
turbbo wrote: » I think the numbers down in Cork say it all, - they can get all the awards in the world - they have to be doing something wrong if Cork is way above it. Come to think of it the numbers in Knock are very impressive - considering it really is an airport in the middle of nowhere.
mdmix wrote: » I don’t think Shannon have a great online presence, and personally I have never been asked for feedback, either in the airport or by online communication despite the fact I fly from their roughly once a year. Dublin have digital feedback capture in the airport, although I don’t know if they collect feedback online. While this using a massive difference I find Heathrow are much better at marketing and capturing feedback online, so Shannon could follow their lead. The real reason I don’t think Shannon market themselves well is that 9 out of 10 people I talk to don’t know where you can fly to from Shannon, and generally are surprised when I mention I use the airport. Most people genuinely wouldn’t even consider it an option. Shannon have stepped it up recently tho and are improving. Also I don’t think a lot of business people use Shannon, and while it is the airlines responsibility to do market research, growth in Shannon is so slow the airport should really consider stepping in to get a better idea of business needs in the area. I’d also take the award with a pinch of salt. Most awards in any industry only recognize the best application form from whoever pays the fee. Often these awards require the winner to pay a additional fee to use the award in their own marketing.
Clareman wrote: » I think most people now go to airline websites rather than airport sites to make their decisions
Cookiemunster wrote: » I have to disagree with you mdmix. My parents in their late 60s check the Ryanair and Aer Lingus sites for flights from Shannon before deciding if they need to go elsewhere. If they in their in their late 60s, not being that text savvy, can tell that you don't need to default to DUB, then theres no excuse for anyone not being able to do the same.