Flynn Important Kangaroo wrote: » Physically, got to say, I really like a busty lady, I'm not very amply endowed myself at all, maybe that's why. Fuller figured in general, and very pale skin. I was born in the right country anyway :pac:
Succubus_ wrote: » I'm pale, curvy and busty, just saying
Flynn Important Kangaroo wrote: » And obviously not fussy seeing as you don't know what I look like :pac: Luckily for you I'm frikkin gorgeous! Unluckily, taken! But it looks like you're in with Autosport anyway. What a great day.
Flynn Important Kangaroo wrote: »
Wibbs wrote: » "Cel is short for "celibacy". The manosphere uses this term much more broadly than a dictionary would; it essentially refers to any significant period of time which a male has spent without sex. See: heightcel, hicel, incel, marcel, nearcel, noncel, volcel. Presumably, a guy who stayed celibate long enough could be termed a Duracel".:D:D
yourdeadwright wrote: I don't get how anyone has a type I really don't , So many beautiful women off all types why limit yourself , as I said before its about the spark they give you and it can come from someone you would least expect, Some of the most attractive women I have ever meet are not the most "conventionally beautiful " they just have that something ,
yourdeadwright wrote: » I don't get how anyone has a type I really don't , So many beautiful women off all types why limit yourself , as I said before its about the spark they give you and it can come from someone you would least expect, Some of the most attractive women I have ever meet are not the most "conventionally beautiful " they just have that something ,
Sonic Youth wrote: » A couple of weeks of nofap and they all start to look good.
completedit wrote: » Most peoples types, at least on here are very generic tbh. Type isn't as on the nose as brown hair and big tits. Your type is clearly not conventional stunners, that maybe because you never attracted them, maybe because of the movies and shows you watched and felt more affinity for the quirky girl next door type, who knows. But how do you know the girls you find that have 'that something' are not conventionally beautiful? Maybe that's just your perspective.
Pyr0 wrote: » Really 'glam' women, always seen with immaculate hair and makeup with accessories to boot and guaranteed to be dressed up to the nines going on a night out anywhere, it's too much.
Succubus_ wrote: » I'm so glad that my missus thinks I'm beautiful whether I'm dressed up or in my pyjamas. I wouldn't be able for that kind of pressure to be dolled up all the time.
Marleigh Tangy Memo wrote: » There's a big difference between being dolled up, and putting some effort into your appearance.
Marleigh Tangy Memo wrote: » The above type of women is one that I would find very attractive! I love a woman who looks after herself, keeps herself fit, and puts an effort into her appearance (without being vain!)
Pyr0 wrote: » I'd be taking about a woman who wouldn't be seen dead without their makeup and hair perfect, the best clothes and accessories, hundreds of selfies, it'd be the more extreme end of putting effort into appearances.
Succubus_ wrote: » Well it depends on how much "effort" you require.
Marleigh Tangy Memo wrote: » The thread is titled 'What do you find attractive?' and I answered the question from a looks point of view. What's with the attitude? I answered what I find attractive looks wise, if you don't like the answer cos it doesn't align with your view, why are you bothering reading the thread?
completedit wrote: » One type I'm not attracted to is the hunzo hyper sexual look.
sbsquarepants wrote: » Jaysus, I must be either getting old or forgetting how to speak English (probably an age thing:D) I have to keep looking shít up to know what people are talking about - what in the holy name of fúck is the hunzo hyper sexual look?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/daacf59cd7a891bebb18818f0421c6f0.svg)
