magicbastarder wrote: » at the risk if igniting a tired debate, the sheer number of cyclists i pass these days with no or completely inadequate lights on their bikes, but sporting hi-vis covers for their bags is amazing.
magicbastarder wrote: » wasn't you who made a mistake though?
CramCycle wrote: » Hands up I made a mistake this morning. I thought a car beeped at me for no reason. Looked at my camera when I got into work, wasn't them beeping. The car merged right to overtake but merged right on top of another car who was beside them, who obviously beeped to wake them up as they dropepd anchor to avoid a collision.
CramCycle wrote: » Interestingly the last few days of commuting the number of motorists, both numbers and percentage wise with no lights/parking lights or busted lights, compared to cyclists with no/inadequate lighting was heavily skewed towards motorists.
magicbastarder wrote: » the commute home last night was remarkable for the number of motorists with no lights, busted lights, or DRLs.
Leroy42 wrote: » No, you were right. Look how far the vehicle is out on the rear view, before he moves in on you. So they know you are there, they were giving you plenty of room prior to that. But when faced with oncoming traffic decided to sqeeze the room rather than slow down and wait. This happens all the time and is incredibly dangerous and scary for the cyclist. The driver thinks nothing of it though. I always ask would they do the same if it was a horse instead of a bicycle.
Leroy42 wrote: » No, you were right. Look how far the vehicle is out on the rear view, before he moves in on you. So they know you are there, they were giving you plenty of room prior to that. But when faced with oncoming traffic decided to sqeeze the room rather than slow down and wait.This happens all the time and is incredibly dangerous and scary for the cyclist. The driver thinks nothing of it though. I always ask would they do the same if it was a horse instead of a bicycle.
nomdeboardie wrote: » +1 again This sort of crap is why I have it on my to-do list to ask the RSA to remind drivers that seeing themselves at a safe distance through their front window as they pull level with a cyclist is not enough - their vehicle extends behind them for a few metres AND the cyclist is usually (/hopefully) still moving forwards also! Definitely a call for giving that car a nice clip on the paintwork in passing with an iron-shod hoof :P
CramCycle wrote: » I see on the local facebook page someone put a dent in their passenger door to wake them up. A polite word would have probably done more but alas whoever done it probably just reacted to the moment.
nomdeboardie wrote: » ? Same car?
CramCycle wrote: » Feel free to criticise my cycling here, at the time it felt like they pulled in on top of me but the video doesn't make it look nearly as bad, perspective is a funny thing.
Mc Love wrote: » The Volvo SUV definitely closed in on you for no reason. Nice front camera btw
Mc Love wrote: » Holy crap - no wonder its that good for the price!!
Thud wrote: » Where they fiddling with their headlights (1.29 in first video they flash on then off)? Possibly looking down and distracted:rolleyes:
magicbastarder wrote: » based on an extremely limited sample size, i have reached the conclusion that people driving northern reg cars are angrier than people driving southern reg ones. in the context of a cycling drawing their attention to an issue with their driving.