correct horse battery staple wrote: » https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/07/investing/brexit-banks-moving-assets/index.html They should put that on a side of a bus and drive it up and down the length of the country.
J Mysterio wrote: » To get back to ordinary people... this is a really interesting (and introspectice) article by a gay couple (one English, one Northern Irish Presbyterian) who cycled the border, and framed their journey in the context of Brexit. Doesn't really paint a pretty picture mind.Cycling the Border, 2018: ‘At least yous are Prods, you f**kers’
MrMusician18 wrote: » Given the value of all UK assets is about £10tn, $1tn is not to be sneezed at
brickster69 wrote: » It is not UK assets. They are owned by overseas banks. Just try to think that an American held assets in Ireland and he moved them to another country. Does that mean Ireland lost them assets ?
brickster69 wrote: » It is not UK assets. They are owned by overseas banks. Just try to think that an American held assets in Ireland and he moved them to another country. Does that mean Ireland lost them assets ? FFS, you could not make it up. Next thing you know, planes wont be able to fly.
prawnsambo wrote: » The Lib-Dems are a no brexit party. And coincidentally are the only party to make gains in the last polls.
Tell me how wrote: » They're probably viewing it more as 'freedom of speech' in the main. If they start arresting and citing hate speech, it could lead to claims of 'police state' from these groups and their voices in the media. K Hopkins, JHB etc. Messy messy environment. I wonder does the likes of Anna Soubry have some form of security? Even just a driver or someone to ensure they aren't attacked.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Yeah they got 50% more seats in 2017 than in 2016. Sounds good until you remember they dropped from 57 seats to just 8 in 2016. Like FF here they'll be wandering around in the wilderness for a while. And their last stint in power didn't win them any friends.
prawnsambo wrote: » Ah yeah, that jump in the polls was worth a measly seven seats or something. The point is though, that Labour are slipping when they should be absolutely slaughtering the tories in the polls. And the lift that the Lib-Dems got is illustrative of how their brexit policy is killing them.
road_high wrote: » That article went from bizarre to disturbing. Not sure if it’s exaggerated for effect but hard to believe we share the same island with some of these “characters”.
Seth Brundle wrote: » "You ain't even fu**in British!" If that's what it means to be British then it's no wonder thousands want an Irish passport!
FrancieBrady wrote: » Funny how everyone said exactly what you would expect the stereotype to say. On both sides. Pure fantasy stuff and very exploitative.
cryptocurrency wrote: » People find a few loons and the media is all over it. They never show the genome of the leftie loons who are at that craic all the time. It's all distasteful but let's be honest the left leaning folk who are that loud could outnumber his kind 10 to 1 in the UK.
road_high wrote: » I guess if you go looking for something you will find it. Carefully picked their conversations I sense
lawred2 wrote: » Should be easy enough to source a few examples so...
prawnsambo wrote: » Assets generate wealth and wealth generates taxes. That's what the loss of 'them' assets means.
brickster69 wrote: » Yes, assets generate wealth for the holders of the assets. However tax on those profits are mostly paid back in the home nation. Which is the case for Amazon, Starbucks & Facebook etc. The normal operating margins ( commission ) on opening and closing trades for UK traders are less than 0.00??% of value traded. Tax is obviously due on that after operational expenses. If these companies are wanting to trade EU financial services in the UK then they will have to set up UK companies and capitalise those companies independantly. They are not leaving, they have to leave !
Iain Duncan Smith has said not a single job would be lost in a hard Brexit, insisting concerns fears of leaving with no deal are "nonsense"
As of the withdrawal date, undertakings and organisations that are established in the United Kingdom but not in the EU, and natural persons who reside in the United Kingdom will no longer be eligible to register .eu domain names or, if they are .eu registrants, to renew .eu domain names registered before the withdrawal date.
British citizens with a .eu domain should buy a dotcom replacement and lawyer up, the UK government has formally advised. In official guidance put out over the Christmas break, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) warned that "if you currently hold a .eu registration… you should consider transferring your registration to another top level domain… Examples of other top level domains include .com, .co.uk, .net or .org."
cryptocurrency wrote: » Go to any event and count the militant antfia
Peter Flynt wrote: » I'm not seeing much condemnation on Twitter regarding the thugs around Anna Soubry & Owen Jones from those who led the brexit campaign.
brickster69 wrote: » They are not leaving, they have to leave !
mickoneill31 wrote: » So in the age of everybody having a smartphone and social media to get proof of your claims we have to go to an event to see the militant moron lefties. It's just an unlucky coincidence that the videos we see all over the place are the militant moron guys on the right. Do you even believe the stuff you're typing yourself?