mr spuckler wrote: » yeah they seem to be doing more work on a couple of the footpaths beside the cycle lane.
mrcheez wrote: » right.. just I noticed that sign up each evening when no work is being done. A potential hazard if I ever saw one. Will someone think of the millennials with no lights?!
site_owner wrote: » its really poor at that section, they are redoing a lot of the pedestrian crossings. it looks like a mess today, with signs everyhwere. it goes back to the original design being poor IMO. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5eHHMeW5Do
mrcheez wrote: » What the hell is that train thing @ 0:30 ??
Raam wrote: » Some people are so selfish.
mr spuckler wrote: » that's an outrageous level of ignorance. I think a raised crossing table on both sides would be much more beneficial than yellow boxes, would help give additional priority to cyclists as well as discouraging parking like this.
site_owner wrote: » Legislation is coming for electric scooters, will be interesting to see what is proposed. Personally, if it goes above 25km then I think it needs to stay off the track, but I'm ok with throttle controlled stuff. As long as it's driven consideratly but I hope that could go without saying. Petrol driven anything should only be on the road imo. My main gripe with electric stuff is how little concern seems to be given by the people who have clearly delimited them. They seem have all of attitude of a bad motorist in a rush
Tomred13 wrote: » Well I'm gona be be " that Friday fool " and be unpopular, warned by mods ( sorry in advance ) but I would have (1) called into baths to complain n not left til the ass hole was called to move car, (2) rang clontarf garda, (3) keyed the drivers door..so sorry, my blood is boiling. Such a clearly dangerous n selfish thing to do..
Leroy42 wrote: » But is the driver doing anything wrong? The cycle lane has stopped at that point and no yellow lines. Of course it is selfish but is it more down to bad design and planning. That is the people to be annoyed at.
(2) A vehicle shall not be parked— ( c ) within 5 metres of a road junction; ( k ) in a manner in which it will interfere with the normal flow of traffic or which obstructs or endangers other traffic;
mrcheez wrote: » Do you have an image of what you mean? Might be handy to stick in the mail to Sean.
Raam wrote: » I'd never damage someone else's property... had to get back to work anyway.
Tomred13 wrote: » Hi Raam, so sorry, I wasn't saying you would do such a thing..your a gentleman and a scholar as my cavan friend would say. ☺
I refer to your email of Friday 23rd November 2018 inquiring on progress on proposals to improve safety for cyclists at the entrances to Clontarf Baths. The Environment and Transportation Department has engaged with the Developer over the last six weeks with a view to arriving at a mutually acceptable solution. Agreement in principle has been reached on how to improve the entrances and the cycle track along the site frontage. We are now awaiting a final decision from the Developer. The Developer has advised that they intend to have a final solution, incorporating their compliance submission by 4th December 2018.
mr spuckler wrote: » let me have a look...
Leroy42 wrote: » Yeah, it was a startling poor oversight to leave this out of the planning process. How nobody could see that this was going to impact a major piece of infrastructure and its use is beyond me.
brocbrocach wrote: » the millionaire developers will find a way to smooth things over.
Leroy42 wrote: » How nobody could see that this was going to impact a major piece of infrastructure and its use is beyond me.
The Developer has advised that they intend to have a final solution
