_Puma_ wrote: » The tip of the iceberg.....https://twitter.com/uk_domain_names/status/1067715341424431106?s=19
Britain clings to imperial nostalgia as Brexit looms
road_high wrote: » Maybe the US, India and Africa will take the rest? I mean they all have such a love for all things British and Britain, they must be dying to take up the slack!
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » As they say down under "If you want to go to the outback take a Land Rover" But they also say "If you want to come back take a Landcruiser" Oz only accounts for less than 2% of UK vehicle exports. It's just not going to replace the 60%+ that goes to the EU customs union.
road_high wrote: » But it’ll be all worth it...Australia and the USA are queuing up to buy more Land Rovers and JCBs
road_high wrote: » Or the welcome to Northern Ireland ones which are frankly even more ridiculous
ThePanjandrum wrote: » Why not, it's perfectly possible.
Nody wrote: » You're a fun one, "Might man the border for phytosanitary purposes". You are fully aware it's a mandatory requirement for any third party border and that would include the NI border. You know what is even more funny though? UK would need to implement the exact same thing on their side because if not any country in the world has the right to import food to UK without any controls exactly as in NI. Think about all that lovely food coming from China without any quality controls; yummy! That is of course beyond that fact that the report you're using is assuming UK is capable of doing their part of the border checks; seeing how they have a billion euro fine for failure to check imported Chinese goods why in the seven seas do you think EU would trust them this time to do it properly?
LeinsterDub wrote: » Indeed in Northern Ireland . Signs welcoming people to Londonderry and Fáilte go i lár uaidh are constantly defaced and destroyed
rusty the athlete wrote: » Its a completely new discipline called Quantum Politics.
“Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”
prawnsambo wrote: » It's also £2.7 billion of uncollected tariffs. The UK has a great reputation for looking after their obligations to other countries already. Will be fun times all round when they start trying to make trade deals all on their lonesome.
prawnsambo wrote: » Yeah, that's the backstop paradox. Something that simultaneously isn't needed and can't be escaped. Depending on the day of the week or the latest pronouncement from an ERG type.
Russman wrote: » And if even one of these crossing is made “tarriff free”, are there WTO implications for the UK and any other country wanting to send livestock to, say England ?
prawnsambo wrote: » Yeah, that's the backstop paradox. Something that simultaneously isn't needed and can't be escaped.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Which means the UK can happily sign up to the Backstop because it won't ever be needed
ThePanjandrum wrote: » Fine with me, it's not going to be a huge problem as far as I'm concerned unless the EU still wants to slaughter animals that stray over a border. Otherwise it should be covered by the existing passport system.
fly_agaric wrote: » Of course the hard Brexiteers are courageous revolutionaries, so what the hell I suppose! It's not Mogg's or Boris's bum that will be on the line anyway.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Well given that thousands of British soldiers couldn't defend the border in the past, they're right to consider anything else!
listermint wrote: » The EU the EU the EU. The UK will have to police their own borders buddy. Trade agreements don't just work when one side tries to shrugh off its responsibilities Your ardent need to place the blame for borders at the EU door is gas
fly_agaric wrote: » The way things are going such technologies may be needed for the border in future to try and mitigate damage caused by Brexit, but that is another story.