Markcheese wrote: » Wasn't that one of the given reasons for demolishing everything on Merchants Quay and replacing it with a nice modern shopping centre... It was a hotch potch of different styles and heights and had become (or deliberately been let ) very rundown, Now you'd see old pictures of the Quay and (bar a couple of buildings) you'd think pity they hadn't the frontage...
[Deleted User] wrote: » Not tall enough
Markcheese wrote: » For what?
Deleted User wrote: » For a development in the core of the public transport plans. It is next to the train station, across from the bus station, on the (supposed) light rail line, and the blarney/blackpool line. That should be a spot where there is all the will in the world for high density.
snotboogie wrote: » Timing is the issue I'd imagine. There isn't any guarantee of success for the docklands yet and filling 15 + floors of office could be an issue for JCD. The only reason that the Prism proposed such height is due to the unique nature of the site.
marno21 wrote: » 2 developments into ABP for 2017 Housing Act consultantions the week before Xmas. 273 apartments at Blackrock (modification of this) by Glenveagh Homes 162 residential units (74 houses/88 apartments) at Banduff Road, Banduff, Co. Corkhttp://www.pleanala.ie/lists/2018/new/NewCasesWeekending%2021-12-2018.pdf EDIT: also contains details of an appeal to the proposed Parnell Place hotel
D'Agger wrote: » You'll excuse me for not going back and checking myself but the apartments in Blackrock - I assume that's Jacobs Island, given the volume in question?
snotboogie wrote: » Seems like Glenveagh will be going for 500 homes on their Douglas site.
Shedite27 wrote: » Where's that?
snotboogie wrote: » I stand over it Merchants Quay, specifically the side facing the Lee, is the ugliest building in Cork.
opus wrote: » Have you glanced at the Cork Farm Centre down the road from Victoria Cross recently? It truly is awful!
whisky_galore wrote: » They're all up against some strong competition in the ugliness stakes. At least the farm centre isn't slap bang in the city centre which has more than it's fair share of fugly and/or rundown buildings.
questionmark? wrote: » Ugly and rundown buildings that must be protected according to An Taisce!
cena wrote: » I was part of building the maldron. we did the bar cafe etc area woodwork. Has anyone been in it since it open?
whisky_galore wrote: » There are some decent buildings but obviously the owners aren't arsed maintaining them. Some of them above shop facade level look atrocious, not even bothered giving them a lick of paint to improve the look.
marno21 wrote: » https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/coveney-cautious-on-proposal-for-cork-light-rail-system-895512.html I normally don't have much negative to say about Simon but I don't see what this is really trying to achieve. The last thing Cork needs is "caution". Development in Cork has been far too "cautious" for too long.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm there now
Mardyke wrote: » Surely, there should be an onus and requirement on the property owners to ensure their properties are kept in good condition. If we and a functioning council I suppose...
cena wrote: » How is it?
Deleted User wrote: » The bar/restaurant is quite small for such a large city centre hotel. Nice being in a hotel where everything is brand new and no wear and tear though. Everything finished well and nothing gaudy. Room was functuonal, nothing surprising or disappointing. Except the beds, actually damn comfortable. Wasn't in *ahem* condition to take too much notice...
Slim Charles wrote: » How much for a pot in the bar ?