chalkitdown1 wrote: » A lot of historic derelict buildings in our centre. Be a shame to see them go. It'd be an especially big blow to our drug addict community.
questionmark? wrote: » But the derelict buildings add such character and anything over one storey would ruin the views. Pretty sure I quoted an Taisce there!
questionmark? wrote: » Do you want to explain that statement?
marno21 wrote: » Happy Christmas to all. Any predictions for 2019? I think we'll see some activity pickup and some shifts in direction when the CMATS is published. It'll finally be a blueprint on how the city will be developed over the next 20 years and if there is real will to get the light rail corridor up and running it'll lay down a corridor onto which the most prime development access wise can be located. It's been a great year for our great city and hopefully 2019 is the same.
Markcheese wrote: » Pretty sure you didn't, an taisce don't make planning policy and they can't block planning for anywhere.. All they can do is refer things to ABP..
EdgeCase wrote: » I'm in favour of most of those except Sullivan's Quay. The original building that was demolished was awful and I'm appreciating the view that is there now. Putting up a massive tower there would just spoil the whole look of a very historic part of the city and a view of St Finbarres Cathedral. It needs to be a lot lighter and lower impact. Something glass delicate looking could really work if if just gives you a piece of something modern that doesn't stick out. It's not really the location for a statement piece. That's more for the docklands.
Deleted User wrote: » Hi An Taisce
EdgeCase wrote: » I've nothing to do with An Taisce. I just think shoving a big tower right there is a bit crass. Cork's full of crass decisions like that: Merchant's Quay being a prime example. The back of the Metropole, the original Fas/Tax office that was on that site and quite a few others e.g. the original new opera house. The North Main St Car Park.... amongst others. It's a nice city, but don't do the 'Brusselisation" thing. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brusselization There's huge scope for towers barely 700m down the South Mall. They don't have to be in the middle of one of the few historical looking parts of the city. I'm not against developments, I have no track record whatsoever on any of these forums of being against them. I jut think that tower's ugly and in a bad location.
[Deleted User] wrote: » There is nothing historic about Sullivan's Quay, it is ramshackle and shoddy looking. You are point to a view that has been opened up by the demolition of a building, as a reason to prevent development of a hotel right next to where the convention centre is meant to go??
Markcheese wrote: » There's a highly significant pile of rubble in the middle of that site, But it does look cool now that it's been "opened up", it was never going to remain empty space though, the minimum replacement size would be the size of the old fás building.. And yes it is one of the older, historic parts of the city.. Doubt there's much archeology in the old foundations though..
ofcork wrote: » What about the planned housing in monard.merchants quay seems to be held up laura Ashley and dealz still trading.
snotboogie wrote: » Like Tivoli, I’ll believe it when I see it.
Markcheese wrote: » Well the container port will be gone soon, And I assume port of Cork need the money from land sales to finance the new facilities... But as to Wether it'll end up sold to one developer or be sold site by site, who knows.. Could spend years being flipped between developers, and that's before it goes for planning, flipped a few more times Ect Ect... I assume cork city Council will have, or already have an outline plan for the area, which should help planning..