recyclebin wrote: » I'm surprised it took so long for drones to be used to do something like this. I thought they would more likely be used to interfere with some of the world leaders travel plans or events.
Reati wrote: » You have to get around things like GEO. It's not actually very easy to fly one of these at an airport. This person knows a thing or too about how to defeat that system. It's not your average Joe off the shelf drone.
Reati wrote: » recyclebin wrote: » I'm surprised it took so long for drones to be used to do something like this. I thought they would more likely be used to interfere with some of the world leaders travel plans or events. You have to get around things like GEO. It's not actually very easy to fly one of these at an airport. This person knows a thing or too about how to defeat that system. It's not your average Joe off the shelf drone.
Homer wrote: » Problem is that it’s really only DJI that are a responsible company and insist on the geofencing on their drones. There are heaps of very capable Chinese drones that don’t have that technology built in. And like everything there are ways to jailbreak the DJI software to bypass the geofencing! It’s virtually impossible to stop a determined idiot with a drone from repeating this. Short of shooting them out of the sky if you can locate it and keep up with it. Maximum speed and agility means they can outrun a car easily!
dohouch wrote: » Shotgun, the ones they use for Geese. Not a shotgun owner or ever have been, but I know there are shotguns narrow gauge, tight shot pattern, are used as for high flying geese, but have see zig-zagging low flying Snipe taken down
Deleted User wrote: » It's my belief that there will be a major terrorist attack(s) using drones in the near future. The technology has gotten so cheap, and the stuff they can do with programmed GPS routes, improved flight time, flying in convoy, over walls etc. I shudder to think of the possibilities. Thankfully in this case it just seems to be somebody intent on causing disruption. Perhaps an ex-employee with a grudge.
EdgeCase wrote: » I don't understand how the drone is staying powered for this long. They typically shouldn't have a battery life of much more than 30 minutes.
robinph wrote: » It's not, but other than official statements that Gatwick spotted a drone at 9pm on the 19th and then 3:45am, 7am and 12pm that is all we have on confirmed drone activity.
Locker10a wrote: » Aren’t there multiple ones?
Colonel Claptrap wrote: » Tinfoil hat time. Here goes. There are no drones. MI5 intercepted intelligence suggesting a highjacking team were about to board a flight at LGW. No other details. Authorities have closed the airport (using drones as a ruse), hoping to flush out the terrorists, without alerting the general public and passengers inside the terminal. If they are spooked, they might take hostages. A lot of passengers have remained in the airport since last night. So have the terrorists. Face recognition CCTV is scouring the exits. Authorities are waiting for the terrorists to bolt. Also, and this is the important part, Bruce Willis has been drinking in the airport bar all night. He got in a scuffle with security, lost his shoes and socks and was thrown through a WH Smith window. There is glass everywhere.
Car99 wrote: » What does Bruce think of the flight crew that reported the drones , are they complicit?
Reati wrote: » https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2018/12/20/gatwick-airport_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqeo_i_u9APj8RuoebjoAHt0k9u7HhRJvuo-ZLenGRumA.jpg That is the supposedly picture.
Reati wrote: » That was my point. Someone went to the hassle of figuring out how to do this. They either built, modded or researched a drone to do this. Of course you can get around it but you need to figure it out. Anyway, What I don’t get is why the airport is still closed. There has been no updated sightings since this Morning.