murpho999 wrote: » What do you think a CEO of an organisation such as Concern Wordwide with over 3000 employees should be paid? Have you thought about what would happen to the people who need their help if the staff were paid less or not paid at all as many think should happen?
The Tetrarch wrote: » Foreign mainly. A school build in Kenya, bicycles for World Bicycle Relief (Africa), orphanage in Argentina, St Vincent de Paul in Ireland. I'm not paying the six figure salaries of the charities in Ireland.
facehugger99 wrote: » Own your meanness. Don't be looking for excuses.
DesperateDan wrote: » Gave to concern for years. One day I met a Concern chugger and gladly acknowledged them and told them I'm all signed up thank you very much. Well they had me talking for 5 mins and managed to have me double the amount I was giving them. I can't even look at a chugger now for fear of doing that again Had to quit the direct debit after about 2 years of paying that, and forgot about it. Then someone from the Irish Hospice Foundation knocks on the front door and I'm signed up to them now :pac: But hey, at least they have a competition for a Fiesta.
goat2 wrote: » Most families rely on 35 to 40 thousand to live, some live on less than 20, what is wrong with a normal wage, especially since it is coming from the good will of the hardworking tax payer in the first place to help the needy
murpho999 wrote: » Because good and genuine CEOs are very capable people and lead organisations. Their skills are very marketable and their services would be in demand and they could command high salaries in a commercial organisation. Charities have to compete with that. The people you are talking about being on 35k to 40k are not capable of working at the level of a CEO. If charities did not pay the money they would not get quality people and their programs, projects etc would not happen and people would not get the help they need.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » I am in agreement with the above and IMO a lot of charities could be amalgamated resulting in lower wage bills leaving more money for frontline services
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Charities receive significant funding from the state. The state receives tax form me every week and on every purchase I make. So yes I give to charities indirectly.
downtheroad wrote: » This. How many cancer charities exist in Ireland, each with admin expenses and salaries for CEOs? If there was one overall cancer charity, headed up by a well paid and very organised CEO who could allocate funds into various different cancer research projects and funds it would be a far better use of money. I also think people would give more generously to 1 umbrella charity like this rather than splitting donations amongst several competing charities. And they could really promote 1 donation day, such as daffodil day, where again the public might be tempted to donate €50 instead of €2.
witchgirl26 wrote: Do you know how much they get? For example St. Francis Hospice in Raheny (who I support). They receive funding for staff costs from the HSE and other than that very limited amounts from the government. In fact the building of the new unit in Blanchardstown was completely funded by donations and the loans related to the same are also paid off using the donations (this is made clear in their annual report) as they did not receive money to do this from the government but it's a much needed and utilised facility.