seamus wrote: » A "managed" no deal is basically playing chicken. "The EU won't let us just crash out. So let's go with no deal and a pile of last-minute contingency arrangements will have to be put into place". Is it theoretically possible? Well, yes. The EU could temporarily revert the competencies for various agreements, back to a local level. So Ireland could then enact emergency legislation that regulates the control of trade, flights, ships, etc between Ireland and the UK. With the understanding that six months later, everything reverts to EU rules and/or whatever new agreements have been made with the UK. But of course, then every EU country has to do that. Ireland can't write legislation that controls the passage of flights through French airspace. Which is chaos. And there's no carrot; no benefit to the EU of providing such an arrangement. The EU will enact its own emergency legislation to cover the union as a whole, but only insofar as it will protect EU interests. Again, there's no carrot for the EU to enact temporary emergency legislation to "save" the UK from its own fvck up. The EU has stated pretty clearly that they're not going to kick this can down the road. They're not going to put temporary arrangements in place because the UK couldn't get its sh1t together. What the EU puts in place to handle the world post-29th March, will be in place indefinitely.
RobMc59 wrote: » If the ira hadn't blew up the school bus Arlene Foster was on she probably would be a different person now and not the DUP leader-so it could be said that tactic was counter productive.
boggerman1 wrote: » When the big farmers in the north who would have been staunch dup voters up to now lose their single farm payments from end of march hopefully at the next election up north they will ditch the dup and consign them to history.up to 80% of ni farmers incomes comes from EU
downcow wrote: ...never mind such an undemocratic conglomerate of 27 states.
CelticRambler wrote: » according to WTO rules, if the UK allows one cow or one litre of milk to be brought into NI from the EU without being checked, then every country in the world can send their cattle, beef and dairy products into the UK without any checks.
Russman wrote: » Would this criteria be met by Joe Bloggs farmer who's land straddles the border and he's moving his livestock from field to field, potentially crossing the border several times ?
correct horse battery staple wrote: » I dunno people who run business can not afford to ignore reality.
mickoneill31 wrote: I'm happy enough to be part of the EU if the sh1t hits the fan. 9 of the 10 poorest regions in the EU are in the UK (one of those is NI) . Brexit is not going to improve that and likely to make them worse off.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » The backstop is important to us, which is why we have been focusing on it. But thanks for the tip, anonymous member of Europe's most chaotic cabinet!
J Mysterio wrote: » May have been her Father being killed which had the greater impact but thanks for your insightful contribution nonetheless.
Shelga wrote: » Her father wasn't killed by a bomb, he was seriously injured though.
josip wrote: » Corbyn allegedly called May a 'stupid woman' during PMQs today. It will be interesting to see what the outcome of this is. I think it has gone to HOC VAR.
McGiver wrote: » Just to be correct that so that Brexiteers can't blame you for inaccuracy: 9 out of 10 regions in Western Europe are in the UK. The poorest regions in the whole EU would be probably in Romania or Bulgaria.
john9876 wrote: » J Mysterio wrote: » May have been her Father being killed which had the greater impact but thanks for your insightful contribution nonetheless. The IRA shot her father in the head in 1979 but he survived and returned to work as a police officer. He died from a heart attack in 2011 aged 81. Just clarifying ...
intellectual dosser wrote: » I confess to have laughed out loud at her pantomime gag...
keane2097 wrote: » This is it. They have the gun to their heads and are saying 'we will seriously pull the trigger so if you want to avoid being spattered with gore the only way to do so is give me everything I want'. There seems to be a genuine incredulity on their part that we are willing to accept that we are going to get spattered in preference to giving them the unicorns they are demanding. This is despite the fact that we would have to saw off our arms to get the unicorns for them. 'I'd say we'll take the spatter there, Percy, sorry about that'.
Deleted User wrote: » What on Earth did I just watch. That was like badly orchestrated 8 Mile rap battle stuff.
badtoro wrote: » I don't have time for her but it's kinda understandable she'd be entrenched in her views after that happening.
Christy42 wrote: » Distraction. Only Corbyn and a few people near him know if he said stupid woman or stupid people. Stupid woman would have different connotations than stupid man though. If he said it he should apologise. I don't really get the point of getting so worked up when we don't know what he said. As has been said the upcoming collapse of their economy unless they take action should possibly take center stage.
downcow wrote: » I am not clear why many posters on here seem to think NI is going to be in a bigger mess than ROI. If the sh1t hits the fan I would rather be in the UK than ireland. But we should be genuinely working together to ensure the sh1t doesn’t hit the fan. When your stuff is rotting at the ports you will be ok cause you will have the pleasure of blaming the brits for it all
Enzokk wrote: Then if we think there are technology solutions and cameras and scanny things that will make the border frictionless, how is it not easier to have this installed at the 2(?) ports that have ferry services between Northern Ireland and the UK rather than the 208 crossings between Ireland and NI? You are going to need them to have goods checked for the ferry services between Ireland the the UK so the infrastructure will be there for that.
intellectual dosser wrote: » Despite it being so pathetic in light of the current subject matter, I find PMQs so fasinating and amusing. Looks like the media on Twitter are really trying to push the Stupid Woman soundbite. If TM had muttered 'Stupid Man' there wouldnt be half the outcry. They have bigger concerns to worry about than what Jeremy Corbyn muttered under his breath.
Arron Banks’s Brexit campaign discussed ‘micro-targeting’ British voters during previously undisclosed meetings with Cambridge Analytica, openDemocracy can reveal, raising fresh concerns about ‘psychographic warfare technology’ used to target voters in the run up to the 2016 EU referendum. Leave.EU told the UK Information Commissioner’s Office that it held only four meetings with Cambridge Analytica. Earlier this year, Banks also claimed to MPs that his Leave.EU campaign only “had two or three meetings” with Cambridge Analytica and had never paid the data analytics firms for any work. But emails obtained by openDemocracy suggest that Banks’s Brexit campaign had additional meetings with the controversial data analytics firm, which they did not disclose either to parliament or to the information regulator, and in which they discussed in detail how to target British voters. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was included in some of the email correspondence seen by openDemocracy, as was a former UKIP party secretary linked to Robert Mercer, the Trump-supporting hedge fund billionaire who controlled Cambridge Analytica. Topics discussed at these meetings included fundraising for Leave.EU and how to build sophisticated target audiences for pro-Brexit adverts on Facebook, similar to those used by the Trump campaign.
First Up wrote: » The EU has been pointing this out to the UK for quite some but once again, the problem is ideological.