Leroy42 wrote: » They can't even manage to negotiate a deal with the EU, what deals are they going to be able to sign with these other countries. India has already stated that increased Visas will form a part of any trade deal. The US are able to force the UK into an illegal war, what makes you think the UK will suddenly be able to drive trade talks? Asia? Like Japan, the same Japan who just agreed a deal with the EU? And the commonwealth. Like who? Australia have already said they will await other deals before committing to anything. And what are the keys factors of these deals that are not available within the EU?
Sierra Oscar wrote: » Three of the people you mention were Prime Minister's of their respective countries while the other held senior Ministries. Each of them were elected time and time again by their electorates. They aren't exactly career bureaucrats like you make them out to be.
cryptocurrency wrote: » They are unelected bureaucrats who most of the continent are ruled by and don’t relate with. I look on with bemusement at Junker, Tusk, Barnier and that Vosstad eejit. I never voted for them yet we are ruled by them.
blackcard wrote: » You mean places where the EU already have trade deals?
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » I hear this shite sometimes in work and when I point out that the head of state of the UK is unelected and a large part of the system of governence in the UK is unelected (almost 800 members of the House of Lords!!) and the FPTP system is hardly a beacon for democracy, they squirm in their seat and become very quiet as they realise how pathetic they sound
cryptocurrency wrote: » They are unelected bureaucrats
cryptocurrency wrote: » I don’t , I think the UK has Greta system. I relate far more to what is happening and the politicians in the UK then I do in Europe...couldn’t care less about them in Europe to be honest. Tusk may as well be the leader of Cambodia for all that it matters to me.
cryptocurrency wrote: » They just signed one with Japan, something the Japanese will replicate for the UK independently. The US are ready to go as are Australia...these should be much higher priorities then the EU. These are natural friends and allies, nations that can be trusted. The five eyes security network friends.
cryptocurrency wrote: » I never elected them to rule me nor did anymore I know...they didn’t even get them on any ballot
cryptocurrency wrote: » They are unelected bureaucrats who most of the continent are ruled by and don’t relate with. I look on with bemusement at Junker, Tusk, Barnier and that Vosstad eejit. I never voted for them yet we are ruled by them. They are also protectionist, they are scared witless if the UK free of the shackles and making a fist of it...which they will.
Eighth lesson: you cannot, and should not want to, conduct such a huge negotiation as untransparently as the U.K. has. And in the end, it does you no good to try. At virtually every stage in this negotiation, the EU side has deployed transparency, whether on its position papers, its graphic presentations of its take on viable options and parameters, its “no deal” notices to the private sector to dictate the terms of the debate and shape the outcome. A secretive, opaque Government, hampered of course in fairness by being permanently divided against itself and therefore largely unable to articulate any agreed, coherent position, has floundered in its wake. It is a rather unusual experience for the EU – always portrayed as a bunch of wildly out of touch technocrats producing turgid jargon-ridden Eurocrat prose up against “genuine” politicians who speak “human” – to win propaganda battles. Let alone win them this easily.
cryptocurrency wrote: » The UK has plenty in the way of services, Defence , various brand Britain items which are huge in Asia. Stick a Union Jack on anything in China and people buy it, plaster it right across the bag. That blue rag of an Eu flag not so much :pac:
cryptocurrency wrote: » Show me a ballot where I pick these guys, see the options and watch them go at it for my vote
cryptocurrency wrote: » This EU army is a gawd awful idea and I can’t see how Washington or London will let it fly
LeinsterDub wrote: » London is giving up their veto on that and it will be none of their business. If we want to do it London and Washington can't stop us.
cryptocurrency wrote: » Oh how naive...if the US and the UK don’t want it to happen, it won’t ..well not in any meaningful,way. Most European armies are complete tin pot outfits anyway.
cryptocurrency wrote: Oh how naive...if the US and the UK don’t want it to happen, it won’t ..well not in any meaningful,way. Most European armies are complete tin pot outfits anyway.
cryptocurrency wrote: » They are unelected bureaucrats who most of the continent are ruled by and don’t relate with. I look on with bemusement at Junker, Tusk, Barnier and that Vosstad eejit. I never voted for them yet we are ruled by them.They are also protectionist, they are scared witless if the UK free of the shackles and making a fist of it...which they will.
EdgeCase wrote: » I would suspect the UK's future is going to be one of being bounced around by the US, EU and China.
cryptocurrency wrote: » Oh how naive...if the US and the UK don’t want it to happen, it won’t ...
EdgeCase wrote: » I'm not convinced about the ease of a deal with China, particularly with the UK being seen as a US lapdog and the US engaging in what amounts to a trade war. China will undoubtedly use its economic power against the UK's newfound economic embarrassment probably to drive it as a wedge into US policy. For example how is the UK going to be able to ban Huawei to please Trump while embracing Chinese trade? And how will it be able to have a policy independent of the US position without angering the US administration? The EU has leverage due to scale. The UK doesn't I would suspect the UK's future is going to be one of being bounced around by the US, EU and China.