badabing106 wrote: » ... over 100 billion galaxies in the observable Universe Do you think it's more likely or less likely that this planet has the most intelligent species in the cosmos Does anybody else ever look up at the sky and see that vast dark sky with twinkling stars and think...how unimportant and insignificant we are in the grand scheme of things..
suicide_circus wrote: » yes we are. by an enormous margin.
archer22 wrote: » No we are not...we are the ones destroying the planet through greed, stupidity and mindless uncontrolled breeding. The rest of Earths inhabitants would keep the planet in a pristine condition for ever. Now that is being really smart :cool:
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » That’s not a refutation of the Drake equation. If technological civilisations were plentiful then many would be billions of years older than us, and have time to populate the galaxy with probes.
runawaybishop wrote: » Of course it is, you can't just peek a look into a small section of a giant room for a split second and claim it's empty. Especially when you don't even know what to look for.
Raheem Euro wrote: » You also have the idea that any sufficiently advanced civilisation would eventually send out Von Neumann probes, which given enough time would eventually reach every star system. And if this was the case you would expect that there would be an active or obsolete Von Neumann machine in our Solar System that we might end up finding.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » There’s potentially been billions of years for some extra terrestrial technology to develop.
Avatar MIA wrote: » For once my AHs and serious response is the same... why would anyone be arsed to create such a probe/machine.
Also, you'd expect another intelligent life-force would destroy them in a virus antivirus relationship.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » They aren’t viruses. That’s Carl Sagan’s explanation but it never made sense to me.
archer22 wrote: » Except in another century humans will be too busy trying to survive in the hellhole that they have created for themselves.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » The Drake equation assumes lots of civilisations vastly more ancient than us and vastly more technological. More than half would be smarter. Most would be older. They’d be visible alright. As a previous poster says there would be Von Neumann probes all over the shop.
badabing106 wrote: » There are around 30 billion planets in our galaxy , and there are... ... over 100 billion galaxies in the observable Universe
emo72 wrote: » The filter is going to get us. We've only just come out of the swamp, and we've created a **** load of existential traps for ourselves. If we make it through the next 200 years intact we may have a chance. Take your pick, climate catastrophe. Physics experiment at LPC. Biological leak from lab. Plain auld nuclear war. Ecological breakdown. The flu. AI, now that's scary. But we deserve a chance. No reason why, but I'm optimistic. I can't believe we've come this far too **** it up.
runawaybishop wrote: » Yes, it makes a lot of assumptions. How hard have we looked for these probes? Would you say we have searched, for example, Jupiter pretty well? Seriously, this is nonsense talk. We haven't even gotten out of bed.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » My argument is the argument most scientists make. Assuming the Drake equation is true. There should be tens or hundreds of thousands of civilisations who have sent probes. They should be all over the shop. As well as that many technological species should have made visible changes to the galaxy. Dyson spheres etc.
topmanamillion wrote: » There are estimated to be 100 billion planets in our milky way galaxy alone. Even if there are probes "all over the shop", it's an incredibly big shop.
Cee-Jay-Cee wrote: » For anyone to think that we are the only intelligent species in a universe of hundreds of billions of planets really does prove that we are far far far from being intelligent let alone the most intelligent in the universe.