Danzy wrote: » In fairness to the French, British police etc, there would be attacks weekly if not for their effort. One downside is that people do not realise the scale of this threat is much bigger than even the pessimists think.
TomSweeney wrote: » My brother is a lefty lunatic, and his response to these attacks is always the same. But look how much people pollution kills every year ! Way more than terrorism - he's right points negated completely :mad:
DanDan6592 wrote: » No they ****ing don't. Total and complete bollocks. And even if they did, you don't see young black non-Muslims going on shooting/stabbing rampages.
Danzy wrote: » The religious obligation to jihad. The culture of What we view as extremist thinking that is mainstream in Mosques and at the heart of the religion. Like a Christian group feeding the homeless because that is what Jesus wants, yet are small in number. This man is fulfilling the demands of Mohammed. Few hardcore believers in both cases.
Stephen15 wrote: » Yet another terrorist attack in France. They all nearly in countries such as The UK, France, Germany and Sweden all of which have self destroyed themselves through mass Islamic immigration. We don't see any terrorist attacks in Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic or Slovakia.
yoke wrote: » Well then maybe those schools should be shut down under our incitement to hatred laws
weldoninhio wrote: » Easily monitored if you round them all into an internment camp.
Danzy wrote: » They should be. I think It is necessary. It would probably lead to the army on the street in much of Europe and Britain though and a steep upsurge in violence for a while but a long term benefit. Figures of a quarter to Half of Mosques in Britain having such views and content regularly disseminated are given. Many if these can hold 2k people inside. Boarding up them could be messy and violent.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » You guys are far too extreme the other way. I’ve talked to plenty of observant Muslims who are tolerant of all faiths (and I do ask).
yoke wrote: » Who funds them?
seamus wrote: » Maybe we should just fast-track this plan and cut out the wait times. Here's what we do: We round up all the Muslims and put them in one place. Then everyone else picks one family member that they want to die, and we put them with the Muslims. And we throw 50 billion euro in there too. And then we nuke the whole lot. Same outcome, but quicker.
Danzy wrote: » Community funding and often support from the Gulf States on building. The Didsbury Mosque in Manchester is nearly all community funded. It holds a 1000 people, was a Methodist Church.
yoke wrote: » Yes they ****ing do. Keep burying your head in the sand. And you do see young black non-Muslims forming gangs actually
Sonics2k wrote: » Ah yes, round up thousands of people on the possibility that they might be an extremist.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Demetrius Ironically, actions like this are considerably more likely to create extremists than they are to prevent them. A little bit of education goes a long way.
Boom_Bap wrote: » Does anyone have any actual news about what transpired yesterday?
yoke wrote: » Why does the community (which is mostly 2nd generation immigrants) fund them? Is it because they feel different to the mainstream society, and they need to feel part of something?
Rory28 wrote: » There is nothing we can realistically do to stop these types of attacks until Islam lightens up. This attack was 2nd or 3rd generation immigrant like most of them are. They grow up in two worlds, one in which they are in a democracy with equal rights for all and another where they see Women as second class citizens, gay people as degenerates to put it mildly and a host of other medieval beliefs. Is it any wonder they feel disillusioned? The problem is imo Islam but like Seamus said if we ban it then we get the cornered animal analogy. It is also what the likes of ISIS and Al Qeada want.
DanDan6592 wrote: » So no, they don't go on stabbing/shooting rampage then. You see these people form gangs, not become terrorists. Huge difference. Have you any evidence that all 3 of these countries have "major" problems with racism.
Danzy wrote: » Because it is their local Mosque, their community centre, a massive part of their identity. They are part of something.
yoke wrote: » And why do they feel that only their mosque is worth giving money to? Why not give money to the local boxing club instead?
Danzy wrote: » Not surprising you want that always with the gulags and mass murder.
yoke wrote: » What do you think gangs do exactly? Sit around and discuss Brexit? Have you ever taken a walk through Brixton? Knife crime was so common there for a while some years ago that it wasn’t even reported on the news. Man found dead at bottom of apartment block in brixton - no one cares, not even reported on the news. You are a moron if you think no young black non-Muslim men who are disillusioned and join gangs go on killing sprees. Some of you may be old enough to remember that eye-gouging incident reported on the bus in London about 15 years ago - Yep, it was Brixton. So shut up saying they don’t go on sprees. As for evidence of racism in those countries, just look up the number of racist/white supremacist metal/rock bands from those countries and you’ll see the problem for yourself (not saying anything against metal or rock, for the fans out there, just focusing on white supremacist music)
yoke wrote: » Stories seem suspect? So you don’t believe that some of the Hindus or Chinese people who experience racism/hatred in the west would get radicalised, go back to India/China and spread racism/hatred there against the west? Send me a PM if you are serious and you really don’t believe me