kuro68k wrote: » The British government is going to take it right to the cliff edge and hope that someone else compromises. Of course they have their excuses already lined up if no-one does, only real question is who they will blame.
DOCARCH wrote: » I think TM has every chance of winning the confidence vote as realists will see the writing on the wall for Brexit! A leadership election typically takes around 6 weeks! The EU will not extend A50, for re-negotiation, just because there is new PM.
VinLieger wrote: » Realistically is there anyone with enough popular support to win a leadership election?
Christy42 wrote: » Wonder if they think if they send someone new to Brussels then the EU would be willing to go again (and delay the upcoming crash out).
cml387 wrote: » They really have no choice. They're so deep in now that all sides would treat them with contempt if they bailed now.
robinph wrote: » Because they don't want to be the PM during the deal making part of the process, they want to come in after and claim to be the one who can fix it. Daft for anyone to put themselves forward for the job.
Shelga wrote: » Can’t believe they’ve actually done this, with 107 days until they crash out of the EU with no deal. The Tories are a disgrace, an absolute disgrace.
DOCARCH wrote: » I think it's more that they are realists! They are Brexiteers, but have come to the conclusion that the reality is the TM deal is the only deal that will deliver Brexit (and avoid the crash out Brexit). The longer the chaos goes on, the greater the risk Brexit will not happen!
Peregrinus wrote: » May's supporters are already saying that, if May loses and the party has to choose a new leader, it will be necessary to seek an Article 50 extension from the EU. There is of course no guarantee that the EU would agree. But the point is to spook people into thinking that dumping May will proloing the agony, not necessarily to Brexiters' advantage.
Hurrache wrote: » They'd have to, but like you say, the EU have previously said the only way they'd agree to an extension is if there was progress on the current agreement, i.e. it would get through the UK parliament.
Spook_ie wrote: » The UK could in theory have an automatic 2 year extension just by revoking A.50 and then resubmitting it immediately afterwards, they wouldn't be very popular afterwards but it is an option, they could then spend the 2 years gearing up for a hard brexit.
In answer to the question from the Scottish court, the Advocate General proposes that the Court of Justice should, in its future judgment, declare that Article 50 TEU allows the unilateral revocation of the notification of the intention to withdraw from the EU, until such time as the Withdrawal Agreement is formally concluded, provided that the revocation has been decided upon in accordance with the member state's constitutional requirements, is formally notified to the European Council and does not involve an abusive practice."
Hurrache wrote: » Pragmatically we're all team May for today, but it's incredible entertainment all the same as to what may happen.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » That option is based on "good faith". I imagine the EU would retaliate severely in that scenario.
Deleted User wrote: » Is there a difference between a vote of no confidence triggered like this, compared to what many wanted Corbyn to do yesterday? Does a win in this mean he can't do that in January?
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Boris was boasting about Losing some weight and getting a new haircut yesterday, in anticipation of the leadership vote. That sums him up. All about the shallow surface image. What a clown that man is. And the UK will be in even bigger trouble if he gets into Downing st.
DOCARCH wrote: » A lot of cabinet members....likes of Gove and Fox....coming out saying the will support TM in vote of confidence.
Spook_ie wrote: » Wouldn't matter if whoever got in as pm wanted a hard brexit, 2 years ( or until they decide to pull the actual exit trigger ) to reorganise their borders, WTA status etc.
VinLieger wrote: » Because nobody wants the job right now. Come March 29th at 11:01 am people will be clawing each others eyes out for it so they can be the ones to "rescue" the country but nobody wants to be in charge between now and then
blanch152 wrote: » If May wins convincingly, apart from the likes of Boris and Rees-Mogg, surely the rest of them have to rally behind her plan or risk splitting the Conservative party?
blanch152 wrote: » ....surely the rest of them have to rally behind her plan....