BBFAN wrote: » I'm not a bit delighted. I'm devastated for the dead and their families as I've already stated.
Andrew00 wrote: » Cultural enrichment.
Stephen15 wrote: » What will prevent terrorist attacks is tougher immigration laws and the deportation of those with extreme Islamic beliefs will prevent terror attacks happening in the future.
Mutant z wrote: » As usual the do gooders are out in force making excuses for this blatant savagery absolute shame on them.
Andrew00 wrote: » Spot on. It’s almost as if they support these attacks
Danzy wrote: » Confirmed as a diversity incident.
Stephen15 wrote: » BBFAN wrote: » I'm not a bit delighted. I'm devastated for the dead and their families as I've already stated. What will prevent terrorist attacks is tougher immigration laws and the deportation of those with extreme Islamic beliefs will prevent terror attacks happening in the future.
BBFAN wrote: » What's a diversity incident?
Ray Donovan wrote: » Decided to travel to a European Christmas market last year. Actually chose Budapest for obvious reasons.
BBFAN wrote: » :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Nala Creamy Mountaineer wrote: » France 3rd favourite, of the 26 remaining, to leave the EU before 2025.https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/german-politics/european-politics/to-leave-the-eu-before-end-of-2025 Who knows, but 7yrs worth of Christmas markets, is a long time in politics. Just 1 week of protests, directly created a minimum wage increase, and tax diversions.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » Nothing intelligent to add I see.
BBFAN wrote: » That is irony at its finest.
languagenerd wrote: » This man, it seems, wasn't an immigrant - he was born in Strasbourg in 1989. Most of the Paris attackers were born in Belgium, to settled immigrant families who arrived 30+ years ago. One was French and not even from an Islamic background - he converted in 2002. Absolutely, there needs to be more resources put into the screening of immigrants, especially from ISIS-related countries, but that alone won't solve the problem. Most of these attackers tend to be disillusioned young-ish men, radicalised within the country they were born in. There needs to be an equal effort in tackling the reasons they become radicalised, catching those doing the radicalising and providing better opportunities in areas that are at risk of becoming ghettoised (France, in particular, has a decades-long problem with ghettos and disenfranchisement. Tackling that would reduce the pool of people susceptible to being radicalised on the first place.)
malinheader wrote: » When is enough going to be enough. How many more innocent citizens have to be killed before they see that what there doing is not working and is getting worse. Our government needs to take a good hard look at what's happening in a lot of other countries.
BBFAN wrote: » What's a diversity incident? Please explain?
Dante7 wrote: » BBFAN, you are engaging in what is known as "Sealioning". "Sealioning is a type of trolling or harassment which consists of pursuing people with persistent requests for evidence or repeated questions, while maintaining a pretense of civility"
seamus wrote: » Yeah, but this has nothing to do with current immigration policy, and arguably is instead strongly linked to the anti-capitalist marches in that wealth inequality and free capitalism tends to cause the kind of disillusionment and anger that fuels these attacks. Leaving the EU won't make them stop, nor make them less likely in future.
seamus wrote: » Plus the fact that this guy is clearly a psychopath rather than a devoted soldier of ISIS is always a factor.
emptyhouse2222 wrote: » languagenerd wrote: » This man, it seems, wasn't an immigrant - he was born in Strasbourg in 1989. Most of the Paris attackers were born in Belgium, to settled immigrant families who arrived 30+ years ago. One was French and not even from an Islamic background - he converted in 2002. Absolutely, there needs to be more resources put into the screening of immigrants, especially from ISIS-related countries, but that alone won't solve the problem. Most of these attackers tend to be disillusioned young-ish men, radicalised within the country they were born in. There needs to be an equal effort in tackling the reasons they become radicalised, catching those doing the radicalising and providing better opportunities in areas that are at risk of becoming ghettoised (France, in particular, has a decades-long problem with ghettos and disenfranchisement. Tackling that would reduce the pool of people susceptible to being radicalised on the first place.) tell that to the victims
languagenerd wrote: » What's that supposed to mean?