Kimber Nice Stint wrote: » Are they still charging more if you pay by card
Heat_Wave wrote: » Yeh they charge €5 extra if you want to pay by card. How the fcuk are you meant to drive to an ATM with a clamped car? Assh*les
mcmoustache wrote: » That's the Isuzu, right? Something like this? If you send me her pps number and IBAN, I should be able to get it sorted.
questionmark? wrote: » I would suggest buying your mother a bolt cutters for Christmas.
fryup wrote: » and glasses
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » I run a building supplies business, and had a serious issue with people using the car parking spaces outside while not being a customer of my business. I must say I find clamping to be an extremely satisfying solution to this problem. I get a large amount of pleasure from actually applying and removing the clamp. I also recently upped the release fee from €75 to €150, which should give me a nice bit of spare cash to play with at my annual trip to the Cheltenham festival. It’s an extremely effective way of teaching inconsiderate drivers a valuable lesson.
Kimber Nice Stint wrote: » Ncps clamped me twice in 4 years when it was their fault. First time there was a paper ticket in my window, second time they must have not scanned my reg as I paid for parking on my app weekly and had actual physical proof. I’ve also been clamped by them when it was my own fault. I have paid when it was my fault, but on the two occasions they made the mistake the lady on the phone was insisting that I would have to pay and then appeal. I had read and done my research and it’s a known thing with ncps that they do not issue refunds after appeal. So they essentially immobilized my car and demanded payment when I had complied with parking regulations. So, the first time, it was removed with a consaw. The second time, the lock was popped, and the clamp was then clamped to the clamping sign in the carpark, using the same popped lock. Appeal that, fückers
Alexia Prehistoric Theorist wrote: » I haven't worked in a clamping place but I have worked in customer service and laugh all you want but what I said is the actual reality. And you actually inadvertently acknowledged the exact problem - yes, someone higher up make the rules/might be able to accelerate things but they're not around. It's the person at the bottom of the heap who takes the calls and they are extremely limited in what they can do. They don't make the rules and can't bend them. Believe me, if they could sort things out there and then, they would. As it would stop abuse or people getting upset on the phones. Despite popular opinion, they don't actually enjoy that. They are just regular folk like you and me, in a sh1t job until they find something better.
Graces7 wrote: » Way to go! Wish there was a post of the week award! Wonderful!
McGrath5 wrote: » Yet in another thread you have no problem with people sponging free parking of the backs of others?
Alexia Prehistoric Theorist wrote: » Ok with criminal activity when it suits I see.
mistersifter wrote: » Results in...........she got 50 of the 80 euro fine back. More than I was expecting so that's good. They're still c*nts though.
Omackeral wrote: » There is! You won it last week when you compared Travellers to the Amish!
rafatoni wrote: » Has won that award a few times alright. Another classic was irish folk moving to the US and Oz ro claim social welfare. Im still laughing at the stupidity of that post.
CrankyHaus wrote: » There's now a clamping regulator you can appeal to. It's independent rather than the charade appeals process the Clamping companies run. Your mother should use it.
mistersifter wrote: » Thanks, I didn't realize that. There are complaints and appeals forms along with information on each procedure. For anyone else who needs these, you can find them on the national transport authority websitehttps://www.nationaltransport.ie/vehicle-clamping/
suicide_circus wrote: » can't do the time don't do the crime