MFPM wrote: » Nonsense. Most of the Irish media is owned by Denis O'Brien who is above any suspicion of being on the left. Newstalk for example is overwhelmingly right wing in it's presentation - Shane Coleman, Paul Williams (now gone) George Hook (just gone) Kierna Cuddihy, Johnathan Healy, Pat Kenny, Ivan Yates - not one of them could be described as remotely left. The SINDO rag is overwhelmingly written by right of centre journos with the one exception of Gene Kerrigan. You think Sean O'Rourke, Marian Finucane, Ryan Tubridy and Miriam O'Callagan - the latter three with impeccible FF connections, are on the left?
BeerWolf wrote: » Zero repercussions for this behaviour, thanks to the over the top pussification we've headed in. And they grow bolder by the day. I would honestly have zero qualms should a mob give vigilante justice on these delinquents, beating the daylights out of the lot of them. I don't give a damn if they're under 18s.
Stab*City wrote: » That's about as racist as its gets right there.
Stab*City wrote: » Haha you got jokes. :mad::( Well you dont hear us whinging about gangs of youths down this way now do you?
Potatoeman wrote: » No description of the gang or their number. If they are a large Nigerian gang then surely the paper have a duty to report their description and number for the safety of locals.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » Well all of the above is a complete lie. George hook and Ivan yeates I’d describe as mildly right wing. The rest not a chance and if they are they are afraid to express it which proves the point.
Well all of the above is a complete lie.
George hook and Ivan yeates I’d describe as mildly right wing.
scopper wrote: » This gang are a black youth gang, I think everyone in the area knows who is meant. I say this as someone who knows growing up that gangs come in all colours, just this one is adopting imo a sort of London gang vibe that is new (the knives for one). I think it's a mix of just what we always had plus this new type of gang in 2018 where everything is up to 11.
canonball5 wrote: » Is that what I said?? No it actually isn't my little snowflake. I said this group of black youths robbing innocent people of their belongings have no business in Clontarf or any other part of our society.
thegreengoblin wrote: » I'm no 'PC snowflake' or whatever the poxy term is now but you are lying through your back teeth because that's not what you said and you know it.
MFPM wrote: » Why? A gang is a gang, what has the colour of their skin got to do with it?
canonball5 wrote: » Well why don't you show me exactly what I did post then?
thegreengoblin wrote: » This...'If a large group of black youths are walking around an area like Clontarf they are clearly up to no good.' is not the same as this...'I said this group of black youths robbing innocent people of their belongings have no business in Clontarf or any other part of our society.'
Grayson wrote: » You'd have to make sure that you can tell yourselves from the bad guys so some kind of uniform might be good. Something snappy. maybe made by a designer like Hugo Boss. And maybe something in black. A shirt that's black for example. Blood shows up less on it.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » Everything as a white person who do you think would they target? For the love of Jesus it was a black gang as in they were all of African decent which means they all had dark skin which means they were black as in a black gang. How many times do you think I would have to use the term black gang to even come near to the amount of times you and you boards buddies use the term racist? Oh yes the gang was black.
canonball5 wrote: » I am delighted that you have mastered reading to such an extent that you can see the difference in both sentences. What business would a gang of black youths have in an upper middle class area? Perhaps they are helping old grannies cross the road, perhaps they are sweeping the streets. Perhaps this gang in question, which whom this thread was created are complete scum and who are up to no good!! I know which option my money would be on. I'm not her to change your mind, I'm sure you don't agree with me and to be honest, I don't care!
dav3 wrote: » Aw poor fella, break out the violins. We can't have racists upset over being called racists. How do you know "the gang was black"?
thegreengoblin wrote: » Aww poor diddums, are you upset now?
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » That’s all you have nothing you can call me a racist but if I called you a Libtard you would be hitting that report post icon. The tactic of the left is to bully name call troll shut down all discussion as leftist ideas can not stand up to scrutiny and everybody knows it. I am not emotional you brought that in as you have nothing else.
dav3 wrote: » And the far-right wonder why they're a laughing stock in this country. You are highly emotional and it's not just on here is it? Keep playing your little violin. The blacks are coming to get us.
canonball5 wrote: » My love, I could not express to you in words how little your opinion matters to me and how little it affects my life. I'm glad you have the opinions and views you have and I'm not trying to change them. I just ask that you accept perhaps that there are people out there who have a different opinion as you on certain topics. I am entitled to my views as you are entitled to yours, even if I feel you're being naive about this issue. The fact is that there are a large group of black teens running riot in an area of our city, I for one, will not allow my lovely country so be overrun by vermin like this!
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » I have jumped into this thread clearly stated what I wanted to say called out the nonsense and I have not let myself be baited. As for people using the term fat right I will hazard a guess they have no idea what they are talking about. I have read the rules here and I say what I like without fear while sticking to those rules. If more people did that in real life it would be a positive thing. All the people complaining about this gang want is for the law to be properly enforced. Edit there are probably a few ring leaders if they felt the full force of the law I would say the change would dramatic. You have to ask why are the left so opposed to this?
John Sacrimoni wrote: » Same people think our media are right wing, i dont know why you bother.
Everything as a white person who do you think would they target?
For the love of Jesus it was a black gang as in they were all of African decent which means they all had dark skin which means they were black as in a black gang.
How many times do you think I would have to use the term black gang to even come near to the amount of times you and you boards buddies use the term racist?
MFPM wrote: » You're suggesting the 'black' gang are going around solely targeting 'white' people - seriously? Well, we're all of African descent but that said why is the 'colour' of people who allegedly make up a gang important? I'm not accountable for the actions of others, if there is any evidence back your scurrilous allegataion that I've called you a racist, do provide it, please.
All Seeing Eye wrote: » What odds would Paddy Power give on this gang in Clontarf being black. None I’d say because the probability is too high that they are black. MFPM come down to Balbriggan train station any weekday night and you can see the gang for yourself. Explain how you stuck up for them on an Internet forum. PS. Make sure you aren’t wearing any branded clothes or runners because they could be taken from you. Also dont bring a mobile phone or that could be gone too.
Explain how you stuck up for them on an Internet forum.
PS. Make sure you aren’t wearing any branded clothes or runners because they could be taken from you. Also dont bring a mobile phone or that could be gone too.
