nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Dash cam thread 2 (car videos only, no commenting on videos)

biko

Follow on from the first one

Kicking off with a classic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_Vvh9exNqs

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

riemann

It's sad so many users do not know the rules of the road.

Explains why our insurance premiums are so high.

Everyone so arrogant and self important.

dickwod1

tedpan wrote: »

A lot of hilarious clips, Sgt castle loves to drive fast

Yeah very fast!!!

mac.in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZqssK7KUa4

endacl

fritzelly wrote: »

Ohh ffs!!!
Its a dash cam thread!

Is that a roundabout way of asking for more dashcam vids?

:pac:

Hammer Archer

riemann wrote: »

It's sad so many users do not know the rules of the road.

Explains why our insurance premiums are so high.

Everyone so arrogant and self important.

Coming from you :pac:
Where are your dahscam videos?

Carpentry

This is what happened to me couple weeks ago.

Carpentry wrote: »

Now its my turn.

Its actually me being late and stupid. After few sets of waiting I decided to brake the light. 80e fine and 3 points. My question is, was it that/too late ?
of course Guard on the bike had to be there for me.

Now... unleash the beast

This is what NOT HAPPENED to others yesterday.

inforfun

https://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7577769/c1cb727c/stuursukkel_doet_remtest_bij_truck.html

Truckdriver got assaulted and had to call the police after van driver found out the story was on dashcam.

josip

It looked like the trucker moved left at 0:24 ?

iwillhtfu

josip wrote: »

It looked like the trucker moved left at 0:24 ?

He did but the lane was clearly going to close before anyone could pass unfortunately some idiots need reminding of this. Delighted the van got a slap and hopefully driver is found liable

ewj1978

My first upload!
be gentle

Can't figure out how to embed it..nvm.. sorted it!

AndyBoBandy

ewj1978 wrote: »

My first upload!
be gentle

Can't figure out how to embed it..nvm.. sorted it!

What happened! The overtake? Looked perfectly timed & executed legally.

uncommon_name

AndyBoBandy wrote: »

What happened! The overtake? Looked perfectly timed & executed legally.

Glad I wasn't the only one that thought that.

ganmo

uncommon_name wrote: »

Glad I wasn't the only one that thought that.

the only thing that stood out to me is why overtake just to get stuck behind a lorry

wonski

ganmo wrote: »

the only thing that stood out to me is why overtake just to get stuck behind a lorry

To overtake the lorry at next opportunity perhaps?

seagull

AndyBoBandy wrote: »

What happened! The overtake? Looked perfectly timed & executed legally.

Except that the van wasn't back on the right side of the road before the overtaking stretch ended.

granturismo

AndyBoBandy wrote: »

What happened! The overtake? Looked perfectly timed & executed legally.

The van crossed a straight white line on the left side when it rejoined the correct lane, all passing out has to be carried out over dotted white line on the respective side. So the overtake was against the rules of the road. The upcoming corner is probably the reason for the dotted white line to finish.

Plus, only 4 seconds elapse when the van started to cross crossed the white line and the oncoming car.

sundodger5

4 seconds at a possible combined speed of 200kmh? thats a good bit distance wise.

wonski

granturismo wrote: »

The van crossed a straight white line on the left side when it rejoined the correct lane, all passing out has to be carried out over dotted white line on the respective side. So the overtake was against the rules of the road. The upcoming corner is probably the reason for the dotted white line to finish.

Plus, only 4 seconds elapse when the van started to cross crossed the white line and the oncoming car.

The upcoming bend, not a corner, had nothing to do with it, as it actually increases the visibility

It's more to do with junction ahead.

If there was no junction traffic going in the op direction would have broken line and the opposite traffic would be prohibited from overtaking.

The van was a little late returning and obviously tried to see if he can overtake the truck in time. He returned a little late, but nothing too crazy.

McCrack

Yea

Nothing to see here

OldMrBrennan83

New camera, first video, I wouldn't be too boardsy on him.

Seve OB

Looks fine to me

Just wants to show off his fancy new camera

[Deleted User]

Riderless motorbike slides in front of cam car.
https://www.facebook.com/tbrouk59/videos/10215688300614409/

fritzelly

Hard to tell but looks like he was trying to overtake on a bend in rain and lost it.

[Deleted User]

fritzelly wrote: »

Hard to tell but looks like he was trying to overtake on a bend in rain and lost it.

Some of the comments say that he crossed a white line while cornering, something any biker will tell you is a no no!

howareyakid

ewj1978 wrote: »

My first upload!
be gentle

Can't figure out how to embed it..nvm.. sorted it!

Not a perfectly legal overtake in my opinion

BnB

tedpan wrote: »

A lot of hilarious clips, Sgt castle loves to drive fast

... and is a lovely chap as well....

SuperS54

Deleted User wrote: »

Riderless motorbike slides in front of cam car.
https://www.facebook.com/tbrouk59/videos/10215688300614409/

Private group again

inforfun

I am all for not giving inches but you have to pick your battles.....

https://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7577653/f15f65a3/hoe_het_niet_moet.html

Seve OB

SuperS54 wrote: »

Private group again

Should be against the rules to post them. Post a link we can all see or not post it at all

Seve OB

inforfun wrote: »

I am all for not giving inches but you have to pick your battles.....

https://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7577653/f15f65a3/hoe_het_niet_moet.html

What would happen over there?
Guaranteed you are going to get done here for wreckless endangerment or something stupid like that.