giveitholly wrote: » Did that fella from Russia score 4 goals for them that day,about the only thing he did in england
niallo27 wrote: » 11 draws that season.
~Rebel~ wrote: » Absolutely no way could he have held it - he'd only just gotten his hands down onto it, when yer man smashed his foot full force through the ball. Nobody could have held that. Honestly though it should have been a free out, since technically he had control of it... can see why it wasn't given though as it all happened so fast and there's no way a ref could really see clearly that he had both hands firmly on it.
Turtyturd wrote: » If i was going to criticize him for anything some of his long passes went straight out for throw ins, definitely not the goal. He’s showing his worth on a weekly basis no matter how much some try to push the agenda of him being a calamity waiting to happen.
rob316 wrote: » And ya know what I'm most impressed about? He cocked up against Leicester but he's not thought about it for a second, cut out the risky passing and pushed on. He's a strong character who doesn't need to be babysit by his cb either.
MD1990 wrote: » Important the front 3 are rested for Bournemouth. They are a good side & were very unlucky to lose at home to Arsenal & Man Utd.
niallo27 wrote: » Was it not 2 games. Was the draws that killed us.
dogbert27 wrote: » The Arsenal invincibles though had 12 draws but 26 wins.
rob316 wrote: » Alisson was on the other side of the goal he did exceptionally well to get a tip to the initial shot. Looking the best goalkeeper in the league right now, he's doing exactly what the club paid for.
Harry Palmr wrote: » The fact that you could win the league with 12 draws tells me the game is now at a much higher level even though people will swear blind it's not as good as it used to be. They also scored just 73 goals and let in 26 which is pretty dismal for title winners by 11 points
KaiserGunner wrote: » I’ll counter that argument. Man Utd treble winners won the league with 79 points, beating Arsenal to the title by a mere point. So football back then wasn’t as high a level back then either? That Man Utd team was special, yet wouldn’t compete now based on your statement?
Always when Naby had the ball, at least something changed a little bit. We wanted to have positions to involve the players. To be honest, I don’t blame anybody or criticise – I would if there would be something to criticise. But we all know Shaq can play much better – turn in situations, get the ball and be a bit more decisive. The only ones who really tried to do something was Millie with runs in behind and Naby with the ball. Hendo shouldn't be involved in that – he had to protect all the runners. So Naby made all the difference in a lot of moments. I think his blocked shot was the biggest chance we had in the first half, I’m not 100 per cent sure but at least it looked like a proper chance; Burnley blocked it. In the second half, the one-two with Mo [Salah] was a good finish and a bit lucky in that moment for Burnley. In the beginning it was really good and at the end. In the middle, we didn’t use him – I was shouting, ‘We have to use Naby!’ because he was not involved, we played long ball and big switch
Harry Palmr wrote: Liverpools last 38 games = 88 points
shamrock55 wrote: » First time in 8 yrs that all the teams in the fixtures scored Wonder what the odds were
Charlie19 wrote: » Lazy decipher but does that mean there hasn't been a 0-0 draw yet?
eigrod wrote: » Can anyone explain the difference between Mikytarian’s disallowed goal and theLovren/Kane non-offside that lead to the pen last season? The experts claimed that once Lovren played the ball, Kane was then not offside. So De Gea plays the ball but Mikytarian is deemed offside? I genuinely think nobody knows how to apply what is a stupid law.
