GSPfan wrote: » I just read his comments today about all the other top 6 sides improving. He is normally quite smart with his spin tactics but to say Spurs improved because they didn’t sign anyone but kept hold of their players is blatantly stupid. He is losing it if he thinks that makes any sense.
J. Marston wrote: » All the ingredients are there for our own 8-2 or something similar.
xtal191 wrote: » Doubt it, can see him being sacked in March or April
damowill wrote: » Ya Jose is safe until the time comes that we are out of Europe and Top4 is beyond us.
bangkok wrote: » No chance. If they get beat tonight and lose to fulham he is gone. He is barely hanging on as it is. Only a matter of time imo
damowill wrote: » We are pretty poor there is no denying. But the odds of losing to both Arsenal and Fulham at home, are quite slim. Paddy Power will gladly take your bet.
FitzShane wrote: » What will the United team actually be tonight? I for one am not buying all these 'injuries'. Yes, there will be some players missing like Lindelof but all this 8 defenders injured I do not believe. Jose has being playing CMs at CB all season, instead of actual CBs. That has to p1ss a few of them off.
Rossi IRL wrote: » I reckon it will be Darmian, McTominay, Smalling, Rojo, Shaw Fellaini, Matic Lingard Rashford, Martial Surely after calling Pogba a virus he cant pick him?
bangkok wrote: » How about De gea Dalot......smalling.......bailly........shaw .....herrera......fred......pogba......... ......................mata.................. .........rashford........martial Would love to see that line up but matic and prob lukaku will def start
Mourinho: "Before Palace, I said my target would be end of December in top four. Now the target has changed. Now we have to try to be very close to these positions. We need not to be so unlucky with problems that we have. We need some players to perform."
Your Airbag wrote: » Unlucky? This guy just can't see his own faults. Its not luck Jose, we are constantly playing poor football, that leads to defeat not bad luck. Rigid outdated tactics, in-fighting, lack of motivational skills and poor purchases and he th can't see it. He thinks he's been unlucky.
StringerBell wrote: » Yeah, that's not actually what he means at all but sure carry on. Jose bad, everything good when he gone.
Pheonix10 wrote: » Jose is bad. He has been ****. There's more to it but yes, "Jose Bad"
Drumpot wrote: » The pejorative “bad Jose” statement is made because some fans are unwilling (or unable) to discuss the club problems outside of the manager. If you aren’t saying “sack Jose, he’s the problem” they think you absolving him of all responsibility for the way things have gone. They actually think you are “shifting goalposts” if you try to go deeper into things. It’s kind of funny and annoying in equal measure cause it doesn’t lend itself to discussion and forces an echo chamber type community. Every fan knows and accepts the teams results and performances this year are not acceptable. Every fan knows that Jose is not doing well with this squad. Things surely can’t go on the way it’s going, I don’t know anybody saying what Jose is getting out of this team this season is good on any level. But taking a broader perspective on the club issues is not denying this or letting Jose off the hook. I think some People find focusing only on José find it Cathartic on several levels. They know that he can be sacked (we can’t get the board or glazers sacked). They know sacking Jose brings change and with that comes hope. It might not necessarily be good change but change of where We are at. Also to really explore the glazers/Woodward effect on the club could lead to the reality of our situation and destroy any hope that things might improve. In fairness , The short term bounce of a new coach is exciting for us all, but it doesn’t make the other club problems go away or answer any of the questions about the owners/Woodward that many fans don’t want to consider.