beno619 wrote: » Surely you're complaint was in reference to the Southampton game ? McTominay has played what 4 times this season off the back of truly awful performances from established centre backs.
Mitch Connor wrote: » Oh, and by the by... i think anyone using a net transfer spend comparison and argument is a fkn' idiot. to be honest. Why the F is the money United generate via commercial income, which they work hard and excellently at to bring in, considered less usable or correct than money brought in for player sales. The club should be generating income to fund outgoings. United spend loads on wages, they also have one of (if not the lowest) ratio's of turnover to wages in europe. "But my club isn't as well run commercially... so lets just ignore that money!". Idiotic. What you spend on transfers is what you spend on transfers. Doesn't matter whether that is funded by Kohler or selling Daily Blind.
pjohnson wrote: » Net spend is right up there with one of the daftest stats that can possibly be used to prove a point. It completely unravels under any scrutiny.
Econ__ wrote: » Net spend comparisons are a better way of determining the ambitions & efficiency of a football club's transfer policy in relation to other football clubs. To suggest gross spend figures should take precedence when undertaking such analyses would be to display a profoundly juvenile attitude towards the basic principles of economics.
DM_7 wrote: » Net and gross transfers are not the thing to consider. Total funds in and out of the club are what needs to be considered.
GSPfan wrote: » He’s played so little I think it’s unfair to say that. And he has been good from what I’ve seen. Nothing special but hardly crap.
J. Marston wrote: » Our right wing consists of Lukaku shuffling out there now and again while City have Mahrez and Bernardo Silva out there one two-ing and weaving around players. Depressing isn't the word.
Rayne Wooney wrote: » Just one more Huddersfield goal and we go back up to 7th
bangkok wrote: » 8th now and brighton only a point off us.
Quandary wrote: » Our manager has clearly lost the plot, thrown the toys out of the pram and has decided to sulk since he didn't get a defender he wanted. With a disgruntled Mourinho at the helm our season was over before a ball was kicked. Why he wasn't sacked in the summer is a mystery. Woodward and co. presiding over a third failed managerial appointment, dithering, failing to act, too cowardly to make the right decision at the right time etc... Sacking Mourinho now is even too late really. The team is on its knees. Certain players have exacerbated the problem and played their part in what can only be seen as a spectacular failure by almost everyone at Man Utd. Once again, Woodward and co. should be hung out to dry for allowing this embarrassment to continue. The fault is no longer with Mourinho, it is abundently clear that he is done and is just waiting for the axe to fall at this stage. We are exactly where we deserve to be in the premier league table.
Cotts72 wrote: » If he fails to get a result tomorrow night against Arsenal he shouldn't even see Christmas with United. Last Saturday for me was the final straw,that lineup at the back was a disgraceful selection and was clearly mourinho sending a f**k to Woodward
magma69 wrote: » If ye lose tomorrow do you think Mourinho will be sacked?
Business Cat wrote: » Unless it's an absolute drubbing then it's unlikely.
