Deebles McBeebles wrote: » Hahaha back in the days when you could find porno mags "growing" in random hedges.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » No harm in that either my father was part of a large family that type of thing was done. Strong family unit etc. As I said things are more manufactured these days with outside help brought in.
alias no.9 wrote: » No harm for say a 9 year old to be responsible for 5 younger siblings with no or minimal adult supervision?
gormdubhgorm wrote: » That is the implication on this thread on many occasions.
gormdubhgorm wrote: I am not trolling by the way.
Paulzx wrote: » I'm sorry but that's complete nonsense. Children don't have to be in a creche on order to interact and develop. None of my kids have ever set foot in a creche yet they are well rounded and developed kids. They are no different to kids that have attended creches. Some peoples lives are suited to the the use of creches etc. Others don't need them due to their lifestyle and/or work choices. Neither is right or wrong.
cloudy90210 wrote: » nah
gormdubhgorm wrote: » In fairness there are a few things the settled community could learn from the traveller community. 1) The family unit comes first - and is it is even stronger bond as it is not 'manufactured' 2) The large family unit looks after its own - through thick and thin 3) The older people in the traveller community are treated with respect. All old values which I feel are slowly dying for the sake of 'modern Ireland' and so called 'progress'. People seem to forget the positive points in the rest of the noise.
Deleted User wrote: Regarding points 1 & 2. Margaret has no support from her or her husbands families. She was raised by an aunt. No mention of her father.
cloudy90210 wrote: » Kids that aren't in crèche are statistically more likely to be traveller.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » I do not commend travellers who never work. I commend the travellers for thier family ethos that is a different thing entirely. I am not trolling by the way. It just bugs me that because of a few unsavory people. Then the logic is: All Travleler culture = bad All settled culture = good That is far from true as far as I see it.
Deleted User wrote: » Regarding points 1 & 2. Margaret has no support from her or her husbands families. She was raised by an aunt. No mention of her father.
dense wrote: » They can stay in their ghettos and keep integrating with themselves.
dense wrote: They can stay in their ghettos and keep integrating with themselves.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » Broken homes are another issue. They can happen at any level of society, death, divorce, etc. etc. My point was that Travellers view the family unit as important. The settled community where both parents work have definitely lost that aspect leaving it to others to look after thier off-spring.
Spanish Eyes wrote: A lot of Travellers seem to be fostered out. What's the payment from the taxpayer to the foster parent/guardian for this again? Just wondered.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » My point was that Travellers view the family unit as important.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » About 310 slightly higher payment for a teenager. Having said that my wife and I fostered on several occasions anyone that thinks there's money in it needs to find a different occupation.
Deleted User wrote: » Not all working couples depend on others to look after their offspring. Many retired grandparents help out.
gormdubhgorm wrote: So, from what I can see reforming the traveller culture for many on her does not just mean education, and marrying later etc. It means the break up on thier reliance on the family unit - as people would not just like settled culture imposed on travellers. They would like them to do as settled people do - work like dogs, rarely see thier kids, pay extortionate creche prices. Leading to the wonderfully stressful rat race that all that entails. Then the family unit gets forgotten or pushed aside. But family is core in traveller culture one of the positives of its demographic. It would shatter it if it lost that.
Squatter wrote: » Quite true. In their culture it appears to be very important to have baptisms, communions, weddings and funerals to fight at. I'm not sure about confirmations, but I'm confident that you'll be able to put me right!
gormdubhgorm wrote: » As I posted earlier that is playing to the stereotype. Not all travellers are looking for fights at church occasions, it is just a baseless statement. Is each traveller a spokeperson for all-travelllers? Is each non-traveller a spokesperson for all non-travellers? Is each person from one group indicative how another will act? They are not cats/dogs they are people like anyone else.
Church on Tuesday wrote: » If you can support them and bring them up in a half decent manner, as I'm sure this posters parents did, then it's actually pretty responsible.