Shedite27 wrote: » Cork has a commuter train line, with lots of reasonably priced housing available at most stops on the line. It hasn't been embraced, we're wedded to our cars. HEnce Dunkettle interchange, North Ring Road, Ringaskiddy motorway are better supported infrastructures than any sort of public transport.
munstermagic11 wrote: » Again, I'm not saying otherwise. I did actually mention that it needs to be planned for with the future developments in the piece you quoted.
no.8 wrote: » No, it's about future-proofing capacity. Nothing shiny or glitzy about it. It's about installing systems in place to transport people and goods efficiently and economically. This city won't cope down the line. Look at the N40 today sure.
munstermagic11 wrote: » I didn't say otherwise. I don't think Cork requires a Luas yet, but they should plan for it with the developments that are forecoming. I'm just referencing those that see shiny stuff in other cities, and fell no matter what, that Cork must have it.
cgcsb wrote: » Why are cork folks arguing about luas vs better buses. Clearly both are required. As you see in Dublin, despite a 2 line luas system, 1 dart line a planned metro and several planned additions to dart and luas, yet still hundreds of millions is being spent widening streets for new bus lanes, new busses and stops. It's not an either/or.
questionmark? wrote: » Very poor use of space but it's what we have come to expect from the rubbish planning in this country.
marno21 wrote: » 46 units on 14 acres sounds shocking when you consider how close to Apple it is.
shnaek wrote: » There will be self driving buses too, they could run 24/7. Combined with self driving cars they would be ultra efficient and ultra safe. I know Ireland will never be early adapters, and if we do get light rail let it be like Danish light rail, driver-less and operating 24/7
whisky_galore wrote: » Unless they are flying cars they are fcuk all use and only serve to clog up the roads anyway.
cgcsb wrote: » Blah blah blah. Self driving or no self driving. Single occupancy vehicles are the most energy inefficient model for city commuting. There will 100% not be self driving cars in cork in 5 years. Silicon valley is selling you something that's a long way from being practical.
munstermagic11 wrote: » For a number of people (obviously not all) they see it in Dublin, so it should be in Cork. You can't argue with them; it's in their head and that's all there is to it.
shnaek wrote: » All of the arguments about light rail will be redundant in 5 years or so when self driving cars start taking over and people just use them on demand. I'm not being facetious here either, self driving cars and trucks are a lot closer than everybody thinks. In the US they say 9000 self driving cars will eliminate the entire New York taxi service. They will also practically eliminate road deaths, city centre car parks etc. So probably not a great idea to invest in light rail at this stage.
Apogee wrote: » 14 acre site with existing planning (part ghost estate) at Milestream, Shanakiel, Blarney Road up for sale on BidX1.https://bidx1.com/en-ie/auction/property/30474?lotnumber=&keyword=cork&countyid=0&minprice=0&maxprice=0&AuctionIds=&sortId=0&_v=1
whisky_galore wrote: » Looking around Europe, even smallish cities have got public transport that leaves Dublin and Cork for dust, integrated ticketing so you can hop on bus, tram, metro, light rail or whatever. Here we have a so-called transport minister whom I note gets all excited by a handful of greenways getting funding, while cities are in gridlock morning and evening. Even worse the public are content to sit in traffic crawling along with nice thoughts about taking de kids to cycle the greenway at the weekend.
Deub wrote: » I am just comparing Cork and Orléans. 2 similar size cities.
thomil wrote: » I just don't get this Light Rail fetish down here in Cork.
snotboogie wrote: » I'm not sure that Cork has the density for on demand self driving cars. The Irish taxi lobby is still disproportionately strong, do not underestimate them. They have been expert in crafting the narrative around Uber and have managed to garner public support (against their own interest) to render the service completely subservient to taxi drivers.
thomil wrote: » Well, to help the easily perplexed, let me enlighten you a bit. Here’s the full definition of a white elephant from Merriam-Webster: Definition of white elephant 1 : an Asian elephant of a pale color that is sometimes venerated in India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Myanmar 2a : a property requiring much care and expense and yielding little profit b : an object no longer of value to its owner but of value to others c : something of little or no value Leaving aside the literal pachyderm in paragraph 1, You’all see that an object doesn’t need to be completely useless to qualify as a white elephant. It just needs to yield little return in relation to the necessary investment. Going by that standard, all of my examples easily qualify, including Coke Zero Bikes. Regardless of the useless semantics that you brought up, so far NO ONE has been able to answer one simple question: What benefit does a light rail line bring that a properly organised and laid out bus network doesn’t? To be more precise, what use is such a system on its own, without being part of an integrated public transport system? Care to answer that instead of arguing over the definition of every single phrase that I use?