Gravelly wrote: » You got one, you just weren't clever enough to recognise it.
Yer Da sells Avon wrote: » I'll refrain from commenting on your intelligence, but you don't appear to understand the difference between a direct answer and a slippery, evasive one.
Deleted User wrote: » The smugness just emanates from your response, why don't you become an automatic arbiter of justice Ray.
Yer Da sells Avon wrote: » No offence, but I don't know who you are (I suspect you're not even a horse, to be brutally honest), so I'd kind of appreciate it if you didn't refer to me by my first name. Seems unnecessarily over-familiar and a bit creepy. Feel free to continue, btw. I'm simply asking you not to.
Deleted User wrote: » RayM was your previous moniker. Which you don't deny. Therefore I will refer to you as 'Ray' as opposed to an unfunny alternative.
Omackeral wrote: » And look who thanked it of course...
Yer Da sells Avon wrote: » Well, I've politely asked you not to, but do as you please.
Graces7 wrote: » all that you are objecting to is that they do not conform to YOUR ideas, and why should they? They are a different ethnic minority. So yes, wilfully misunderstood.
SusieBlue wrote: » For anyone defending these people, please have a look at the attached screenshots. I read these under a FB article about a traveler woman who was convicted of stealing, a few of the woman’s relatives commented underneath defending her actions. It’s actually hilarious that the apologists are here denying their criminality, their lack of respect for the law, and the fact that they take advantage of the tax payer. Yet here, under this article, we have a few traveller folk not only openly admitting to all of those things, but actually laughing about it. Couldn’t make it up if I tried. How anyone can defend them knowing they openly take the p*ss out of us for going to work every day boils my blood. (I blurred out any identifying info before anyone reports me)
AllForIt wrote: » It really is utterly infuriating what has been allowed to happen and the worse part of it is is it's not solely the travelers to blame but the do-gooders that support and defend them as if to show how virtuous they are in doing so.
tuxy wrote: » Some more culture on display outside the Rotunda maternity hospitalhttps://www.reddit.com/r/ireland/comments/a1hwyi/fight_outside_the_rotunda_maternity_hospital/
Ruraldweller56 wrote: » Do you fit the profile, Avon? Or am I grossly mistaken? Just asking. As I say. Don't want to take the thread off on a tangent into something else.
AllForIt wrote: » Working Class to me describes ones social demographic background, not literally that one works. In any case I used the term lower-working-class, the class below Working Class, which is to me the social demographic at the near bottom of the social scale and I'd say that describes ppl who either don't work, have no intention of working, have no prospects for work, etc.
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » Perfectly put. Making excuses for them, recognizing their "ethnic minority status" and "unique culture," and blaming the settled community for inflicting racism, discrimination, and social exclusion on them only turns Travellers into entitled victims and removes any responsibility on them to change. Instead, settled people are told that they are we are the ones who have to change. Dysfunctional Traveller patterns such as taking girls out of school at 12 and marrying them off to their cousins at 16 are now seen as part of a valuable culture that needs to be preserved. Anyone who points out that this "culture" of disregard for education and early consanguineous marriage only leads to women becoming illiterate welfare-dependent mothers of 5+ kids by their 20s is met with "It's their ethnic minority culture. Are you a racist?" If do-gooders actually wanted to do any good, they would be telling Travellers to keep their children in school, delay marriage and children at least until they finish their education, get jobs, have smaller families they can support, and address the serious problems with feuding, drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, criminality, fraud, and tax evasion in their communities. I'm sure there are some people who are trying to do these things -- but they are drowned out by the spin machine in Áras an Uachtaráin, Dáil Éireann, RTÉ, and Pavee Point who just want to make excuses for Travellers and blame settled people for all that is wrong in their communities. The whole thing is insane.
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » #settledpeopleguilt
Gravelly wrote: » Why do traveller fights always seem to end up with someone’s arse on show, and no clear winner?
Mad_maxx wrote: » The do gooders are not concerned with the traveller's, they're aim is to smugly lecture middle Ireland who they despise.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » I hate the word "settled" so much, it's ridiculous. We're people. If they want to call themselves something different, have at it - you can call yourself an aubergine for all I care. Just don't expect the rest of us to fall in line or find it.
CrankyHaus wrote: » It's more cynical than that. What we're seeing is a wholesale importation of the US victimhood industry. This involves various well-connected parties coming together as a network of self-interest to advocate on behalf of "victims" of the wider society: Researchers and academics get paid to conduct "studies" that prove disadvantage while carefully remaining blinkered to any of its causes that do not match the desired end of "discrimination"; Non-profit "community and advocacy" quangos obtain public funding to address the inequalities presented by these studies; Lawyers get business and profile representing these "victims" when they seek to shake down the public purse; Politicians gain publicity and some votes by standing up for "the most disadvantaged in our society"; Media gets a soft emotional story that requires minimal journalistic graft (typically they're presented with the interviewee by their Quango handlers and know to ask no hard questions, exactly as happened in the first two weeks of the Margaret Cash story when her dishonest gambit was pushed for all it was worth by the papers, radio and TV). This creates a significant amount of important people with a vested interest in the status quo. This is why Peter Casey aroused such vitriol, he threatened to take food from their plates. Actually solving the social and economic problems in the travelling community is not the aim of this system, in fact it would kill the Goose that lays the golden eggs.
Deleted User wrote: » In order to be a member of the working class, one needs to work.
holliehobbie wrote: » I travel on the Luas red line to work everyday and there are people on the Luas from all over the world. One evening I witnessed a teenaged traveller girl reach over across the aisle and deliberately knock a milkshake out of an Asian girls hand. Then she and her pals or siblings? laughed manically at the poor girl. Another day an African guy put his backpack in tge space in between the row of seats and a young traveller girl started roaring and yelling at him that he couldn't put his bag there. And that he should go back to the jungle. The guy ending up having to move away from her. Presume that's part of their culture too?